x86/decoder: Add TEST opcode to Group3-2
Add TEST opcode to Group3-2 reg=001b as same as Group3-1 does.
Commit
12a78d43de
("x86/decoder: Add new TEST instruction pattern")
added a TEST opcode assignment to f6 XX/001/XXX (Group 3-1), but did
not add f7 XX/001/XXX (Group 3-2).
Actually, this TEST opcode variant (ModRM.reg /1) is not described in
the Intel SDM Vol2 but in AMD64 Architecture Programmer's Manual Vol.3,
Appendix A.2 Table A-6. ModRM.reg Extensions for the Primary Opcode Map.
Without this fix, Randy found a warning by insn_decoder_test related
to this issue as below.
HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test
HOSTCC arch/x86/tools/insn_sanity
TEST posttest
arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: Found an x86 instruction decoder bug, please report this.
arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: ffffffff81000bf1: f7 0b 00 01 08 00 testl $0x80100,(%rbx)
arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: objdump says 6 bytes, but insn_get_length() says 2
arch/x86/tools/insn_decoder_test: warning: Decoded and checked 11913894 instructions with 1 failures
TEST posttest
arch/x86/tools/insn_sanity: Success: decoded and checked 1000000 random instructions with 0 errors (seed:0x871ce29c)
To fix this error, add the TEST opcode according to AMD64 APM Vol.3.
[ bp: Massage commit message. ]
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/157966631413.9580.10311036595431878351.stgit@devnote2
This commit is contained in:
parent
def9d27807
commit
8b7e20a7ba
@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ EndTable
|
||||
|
||||
GrpTable: Grp3_2
|
||||
0: TEST Ev,Iz
|
||||
1:
|
||||
1: TEST Ev,Iz
|
||||
2: NOT Ev
|
||||
3: NEG Ev
|
||||
4: MUL rAX,Ev
|
||||
|
@ -929,7 +929,7 @@ EndTable
|
||||
|
||||
GrpTable: Grp3_2
|
||||
0: TEST Ev,Iz
|
||||
1:
|
||||
1: TEST Ev,Iz
|
||||
2: NOT Ev
|
||||
3: NEG Ev
|
||||
4: MUL rAX,Ev
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user