While documentation suggests atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() will perform better
than atomic_inc_not_zero(), this is unlikely to be the case. No architectures
implement atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() directly, and thus it either falls back to
atomic_inc_not_zero(), or a loop using atomic_cmpxchg().
Whenever the hint does not match the value in memory, the repeated use of
atomic_cmpxchg() will be more expensive than the read that
atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() attempts to avoid. For architectures with LL/SC
atomics, a read cannot be avoided, and it would always be better to use
atomic_inc_not_zero() directly. For other architectures, their own
atomic_inc_not_zero() is likely to be more optimal than an atomic_cmpxchg()
loop regardless.
Generally, atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() is liable to perform worse than
atomic_inc_not_zero(). Further, atomic_inc_not_zero_hint() only exists
for atomic_t, and not atomic64_t or atomic_long_t, and there is only one
user in the kernel tree.
Given all this, let's remove atomic_inc_not_zero_hint(), and migrate the
existing user over to atomic_inc_not_zero().
There should be no functional change as a result of this patch.
Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20180621121321.4761-4-mark.rutland@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
f74445b6dd