mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-22 20:23:57 +08:00
f61c42a7d9
Tejun has correctly pointed out that tasks/children test in mem_cgroup_force_empty is not correct because there is no other locking which preserves this state throughout the rest of the function so both new tasks can join the group or new children groups can be added while somebody is writing to memory.force_empty. A new task would break mem_cgroup_reparent_charges expectation that all failures as described by mem_cgroup_force_empty_list are temporal and there is no way out. The main use case for the knob as described by Documentation/cgroups/memory.txt is to: " The typical use case for this interface is before calling rmdir(). Because rmdir() moves all pages to parent, some out-of-use page caches can be moved to the parent. If you want to avoid that, force_empty will be useful. " This means that reparenting is not really required as rmdir will reparent pages implicitly from the safe context. If we remove it from mem_cgroup_force_empty then we are safe even with existing tasks because the number of reclaim attempts is bounded. Moreover the knob still does what the documentation claims (modulo reparenting which doesn't make any difference) and users might expect. Longterm we want to deprecate the whole knob and put the reparented pages to the tail of parent LRU during cgroup removal. tj: Removed unused variable @cgrp from mem_cgroup_force_empty() Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Acked-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| 00-INDEX | ||
| blkio-controller.txt | ||
| cgroups.txt | ||
| cpuacct.txt | ||
| cpusets.txt | ||
| devices.txt | ||
| freezer-subsystem.txt | ||
| hugetlb.txt | ||
| memcg_test.txt | ||
| memory.txt | ||
| net_cls.txt | ||
| net_prio.txt | ||
| resource_counter.txt | ||
| unified-hierarchy.txt | ||