mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-23 04:34:11 +08:00
13863a66c9
In kernel/irq/manage.c::irq_set_irq_wake() we call irq_get_desc_buslock() which may return NULL, but the code dereferences the result unconditionally. irq_set_irq_wake() has lots of callers - I checked a few and I couldn't find anything that guarantees that they won't call it with some input that will cause irq_get_desc_buslock() to return NULL, so I think it's a good thing to test and -EINVAL was the most sane error code in this situation that I could think of. Not all callers test the return value of irq_set_irq_wake(), but those that do take != 0 to mean error as far as I can see, so they should be fine. I guess those that don't test actually should, but that's a different issue. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LNX.2.00.1106092300360.17868@swampdragon.chaosbits.net Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| autoprobe.c | ||
| chip.c | ||
| debug.h | ||
| devres.c | ||
| dummychip.c | ||
| generic-chip.c | ||
| handle.c | ||
| internals.h | ||
| irqdesc.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| manage.c | ||
| migration.c | ||
| pm.c | ||
| proc.c | ||
| resend.c | ||
| settings.h | ||
| spurious.c | ||