2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-22 12:14:01 +08:00
linux-next/fs/fuse
Miklos Szeredi 875d95ec9e [PATCH] fuse: fix compile without CONFIG_BLOCK
Randy Dunlap wote:
> Should FUSE depend on BLOCK?  Without that and with BLOCK=n, I get:
>
> inode.c:(.text+0x3acc5): undefined reference to `sb_set_blocksize'
> inode.c:(.text+0x3a393): undefined reference to `get_sb_bdev'
> fs/built-in.o:(.data+0xd718): undefined reference to `kill_block_super

Most fuse filesystems work fine without block device support, so I
think a better solution is to disable the 'fuseblk' filesystem type if
BLOCK=n.

Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-12-07 08:39:32 -08:00
..
control.c [PATCH] r/o bind mount prepwork: inc_nlink() helper 2006-10-01 00:39:30 -07:00
dev.c [PATCH] slab: remove kmem_cache_t 2006-12-07 08:39:25 -08:00
dir.c [PATCH] fuse: add bmap support 2006-12-07 08:39:32 -08:00
file.c [PATCH] fuse: add bmap support 2006-12-07 08:39:32 -08:00
fuse_i.h [PATCH] fuse: add DESTROY operation 2006-12-07 08:39:32 -08:00
inode.c [PATCH] fuse: fix compile without CONFIG_BLOCK 2006-12-07 08:39:32 -08:00
Makefile [PATCH] fuse: add control filesystem 2006-06-25 10:01:19 -07:00