mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-29 07:34:06 +08:00
f8b427772a
Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: He Ying <heying24@huawei.com> Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210326100853.173586-1-heying24@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
111 lines
5.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
111 lines
5.5 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
|
|
|
DeviceTree Booting
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
During the development of the Linux/ppc64 kernel, and more specifically, the
|
|
addition of new platform types outside of the old IBM pSeries/iSeries pair, it
|
|
was decided to enforce some strict rules regarding the kernel entry and
|
|
bootloader <-> kernel interfaces, in order to avoid the degeneration that had
|
|
become the ppc32 kernel entry point and the way a new platform should be added
|
|
to the kernel. The legacy iSeries platform breaks those rules as it predates
|
|
this scheme, but no new board support will be accepted in the main tree that
|
|
doesn't follow them properly. In addition, since the advent of the arch/powerpc
|
|
merged architecture for ppc32 and ppc64, new 32-bit platforms and 32-bit
|
|
platforms which move into arch/powerpc will be required to use these rules as
|
|
well.
|
|
|
|
The main requirement that will be defined in more detail below is the presence
|
|
of a device-tree whose format is defined after Open Firmware specification.
|
|
However, in order to make life easier to embedded board vendors, the kernel
|
|
doesn't require the device-tree to represent every device in the system and only
|
|
requires some nodes and properties to be present. For example, the kernel does
|
|
not require you to create a node for every PCI device in the system. It is a
|
|
requirement to have a node for PCI host bridges in order to provide interrupt
|
|
routing information and memory/IO ranges, among others. It is also recommended
|
|
to define nodes for on chip devices and other buses that don't specifically fit
|
|
in an existing OF specification. This creates a great flexibility in the way the
|
|
kernel can then probe those and match drivers to device, without having to hard
|
|
code all sorts of tables. It also makes it more flexible for board vendors to do
|
|
minor hardware upgrades without significantly impacting the kernel code or
|
|
cluttering it with special cases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entry point
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
There is one single entry point to the kernel, at the start
|
|
of the kernel image. That entry point supports two calling
|
|
conventions:
|
|
|
|
a) Boot from Open Firmware. If your firmware is compatible
|
|
with Open Firmware (IEEE 1275) or provides an OF compatible
|
|
client interface API (support for "interpret" callback of
|
|
forth words isn't required), you can enter the kernel with:
|
|
|
|
r5 : OF callback pointer as defined by IEEE 1275
|
|
bindings to powerpc. Only the 32-bit client interface
|
|
is currently supported
|
|
|
|
r3, r4 : address & length of an initrd if any or 0
|
|
|
|
The MMU is either on or off; the kernel will run the
|
|
trampoline located in arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c to
|
|
extract the device-tree and other information from open
|
|
firmware and build a flattened device-tree as described
|
|
in b). prom_init() will then re-enter the kernel using
|
|
the second method. This trampoline code runs in the
|
|
context of the firmware, which is supposed to handle all
|
|
exceptions during that time.
|
|
|
|
b) Direct entry with a flattened device-tree block. This entry
|
|
point is called by a) after the OF trampoline and can also be
|
|
called directly by a bootloader that does not support the Open
|
|
Firmware client interface. It is also used by "kexec" to
|
|
implement "hot" booting of a new kernel from a previous
|
|
running one. This method is what I will describe in more
|
|
details in this document, as method a) is simply standard Open
|
|
Firmware, and thus should be implemented according to the
|
|
various standard documents defining it and its binding to the
|
|
PowerPC platform. The entry point definition then becomes:
|
|
|
|
r3 : physical pointer to the device-tree block
|
|
(defined in chapter II) in RAM
|
|
|
|
r4 : physical pointer to the kernel itself. This is
|
|
used by the assembly code to properly disable the MMU
|
|
in case you are entering the kernel with MMU enabled
|
|
and a non-1:1 mapping.
|
|
|
|
r5 : NULL (as to differentiate with method a)
|
|
|
|
Note about SMP entry: Either your firmware puts your other
|
|
CPUs in some sleep loop or spin loop in ROM where you can get
|
|
them out via a soft reset or some other means, in which case
|
|
you don't need to care, or you'll have to enter the kernel
|
|
with all CPUs. The way to do that with method b) will be
|
|
described in a later revision of this document.
|
|
|
|
Board supports (platforms) are not exclusive config options. An
|
|
arbitrary set of board supports can be built in a single kernel
|
|
image. The kernel will "know" what set of functions to use for a
|
|
given platform based on the content of the device-tree. Thus, you
|
|
should:
|
|
|
|
a) add your platform support as a _boolean_ option in
|
|
arch/powerpc/Kconfig, following the example of PPC_PSERIES,
|
|
PPC_PMAC and PPC_MAPLE. The latter is probably a good
|
|
example of a board support to start from.
|
|
|
|
b) create your main platform file as
|
|
"arch/powerpc/platforms/myplatform/myboard_setup.c" and add it
|
|
to the Makefile under the condition of your ``CONFIG_``
|
|
option. This file will define a structure of type "ppc_md"
|
|
containing the various callbacks that the generic code will
|
|
use to get to your platform specific code
|
|
|
|
A kernel image may support multiple platforms, but only if the
|
|
platforms feature the same core architecture. A single kernel build
|
|
cannot support both configurations with Book E and configurations
|
|
with classic Powerpc architectures.
|