mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-15 00:34:10 +08:00
99b7623380
Setting ->owner as done currently (pde->owner = THIS_MODULE) is racy as correctly noted at bug #12454. Someone can lookup entry with NULL ->owner, thus not pinning enything, and release it later resulting in module refcount underflow. We can keep ->owner and supply it at registration time like ->proc_fops and ->data. But this leaves ->owner as easy-manipulative field (just one C assignment) and somebody will forget to unpin previous/pin current module when switching ->owner. ->proc_fops is declared as "const" which should give some thoughts. ->read_proc/->write_proc were just fixed to not require ->owner for protection. rmmod'ed directories will be empty and return "." and ".." -- no harm. And directories with tricky enough readdir and lookup shouldn't be modular. We definitely don't want such modular code. Removing ->owner will also make PDE smaller. So, let's nuke it. Kudos to Jeff Layton for reminding about this, let's say, oversight. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12454 Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
dasd_3990_erp.c | ||
dasd_alias.c | ||
dasd_devmap.c | ||
dasd_diag.c | ||
dasd_diag.h | ||
dasd_eckd.c | ||
dasd_eckd.h | ||
dasd_eer.c | ||
dasd_erp.c | ||
dasd_fba.c | ||
dasd_fba.h | ||
dasd_genhd.c | ||
dasd_int.h | ||
dasd_ioctl.c | ||
dasd_proc.c | ||
dasd.c | ||
dcssblk.c | ||
Kconfig | ||
Makefile | ||
xpram.c |