mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-27 06:34:11 +08:00
3a09b8d45b
I feel that the example given in the document to show the possibility of task starvation of configurable period is wrong. The example says group A and B both have 50% bandwidth, and a while (1) loop in A will run for the full period of B and can starve B's tasks. So I think the runtime of group A should be 50000us, then the period and runtime of group B should be 50000us and 25000us. Signed-off-by: Zhou Chengming <zhouchengming1@huawei.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: corbet@lwn.net Cc: iamyooon@gmail.com Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Cc: lizefan@huawei.com Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1485069755-44287-1-git-send-email-zhouchengming1@huawei.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| 00-INDEX | ||
| completion.txt | ||
| sched-arch.txt | ||
| sched-bwc.txt | ||
| sched-deadline.txt | ||
| sched-design-CFS.txt | ||
| sched-domains.txt | ||
| sched-nice-design.txt | ||
| sched-rt-group.txt | ||
| sched-stats.txt | ||