mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-23 12:43:55 +08:00
99aef427e2
Based on questions people have asked me. Repeatedly. Signed-off-by: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
266 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
266 lines
12 KiB
Plaintext
ramfs, rootfs and initramfs
|
|
October 17, 2005
|
|
Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
|
|
=============================
|
|
|
|
What is ramfs?
|
|
--------------
|
|
|
|
Ramfs is a very simple filesystem that exports Linux's disk caching
|
|
mechanisms (the page cache and dentry cache) as a dynamically resizable
|
|
ram-based filesystem.
|
|
|
|
Normally all files are cached in memory by Linux. Pages of data read from
|
|
backing store (usually the block device the filesystem is mounted on) are kept
|
|
around in case it's needed again, but marked as clean (freeable) in case the
|
|
Virtual Memory system needs the memory for something else. Similarly, data
|
|
written to files is marked clean as soon as it has been written to backing
|
|
store, but kept around for caching purposes until the VM reallocates the
|
|
memory. A similar mechanism (the dentry cache) greatly speeds up access to
|
|
directories.
|
|
|
|
With ramfs, there is no backing store. Files written into ramfs allocate
|
|
dentries and page cache as usual, but there's nowhere to write them to.
|
|
This means the pages are never marked clean, so they can't be freed by the
|
|
VM when it's looking to recycle memory.
|
|
|
|
The amount of code required to implement ramfs is tiny, because all the
|
|
work is done by the existing Linux caching infrastructure. Basically,
|
|
you're mounting the disk cache as a filesystem. Because of this, ramfs is not
|
|
an optional component removable via menuconfig, since there would be negligible
|
|
space savings.
|
|
|
|
ramfs and ramdisk:
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
The older "ram disk" mechanism created a synthetic block device out of
|
|
an area of ram and used it as backing store for a filesystem. This block
|
|
device was of fixed size, so the filesystem mounted on it was of fixed
|
|
size. Using a ram disk also required unnecessarily copying memory from the
|
|
fake block device into the page cache (and copying changes back out), as well
|
|
as creating and destroying dentries. Plus it needed a filesystem driver
|
|
(such as ext2) to format and interpret this data.
|
|
|
|
Compared to ramfs, this wastes memory (and memory bus bandwidth), creates
|
|
unnecessary work for the CPU, and pollutes the CPU caches. (There are tricks
|
|
to avoid this copying by playing with the page tables, but they're unpleasantly
|
|
complicated and turn out to be about as expensive as the copying anyway.)
|
|
More to the point, all the work ramfs is doing has to happen _anyway_,
|
|
since all file access goes through the page and dentry caches. The ram
|
|
disk is simply unnecessary, ramfs is internally much simpler.
|
|
|
|
Another reason ramdisks are semi-obsolete is that the introduction of
|
|
loopback devices offered a more flexible and convenient way to create
|
|
synthetic block devices, now from files instead of from chunks of memory.
|
|
See losetup (8) for details.
|
|
|
|
ramfs and tmpfs:
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
One downside of ramfs is you can keep writing data into it until you fill
|
|
up all memory, and the VM can't free it because the VM thinks that files
|
|
should get written to backing store (rather than swap space), but ramfs hasn't
|
|
got any backing store. Because of this, only root (or a trusted user) should
|
|
be allowed write access to a ramfs mount.
|
|
|
|
A ramfs derivative called tmpfs was created to add size limits, and the ability
|
|
to write the data to swap space. Normal users can be allowed write access to
|
|
tmpfs mounts. See Documentation/filesystems/tmpfs.txt for more information.
|
|
|
|
What is rootfs?
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
Rootfs is a special instance of ramfs, which is always present in 2.6 systems.
|
|
(It's used internally as the starting and stopping point for searches of the
|
|
kernel's doubly-linked list of mount points.)
|
|
|
|
Most systems just mount another filesystem over it and ignore it. The
|
|
amount of space an empty instance of ramfs takes up is tiny.
|
|
|
|
What is initramfs?
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
All 2.6 Linux kernels contain a gzipped "cpio" format archive, which is
|
|
extracted into rootfs when the kernel boots up. After extracting, the kernel
|
|
checks to see if rootfs contains a file "init", and if so it executes it as PID
|
|
1. If found, this init process is responsible for bringing the system the
|
|
rest of the way up, including locating and mounting the real root device (if
|
|
any). If rootfs does not contain an init program after the embedded cpio
|
|
archive is extracted into it, the kernel will fall through to the older code
|
|
to locate and mount a root partition, then exec some variant of /sbin/init
|
|
out of that.
|
|
|
|
All this differs from the old initrd in several ways:
|
|
|
|
- The old initrd was a separate file, while the initramfs archive is linked
|
|
into the linux kernel image. (The directory linux-*/usr is devoted to
|
|
generating this archive during the build.)
|
|
|
|
- The old initrd file was a gzipped filesystem image (in some file format,
|
|
such as ext2, that had to be built into the kernel), while the new
|
|
initramfs archive is a gzipped cpio archive (like tar only simpler,
|
|
see cpio(1) and Documentation/early-userspace/buffer-format.txt).
|
|
|
|
- The program run by the old initrd (which was called /initrd, not /init) did
|
|
some setup and then returned to the kernel, while the init program from
|
|
initramfs is not expected to return to the kernel. (If /init needs to hand
|
|
off control it can overmount / with a new root device and exec another init
|
|
program. See the switch_root utility, below.)
|
|
|
|
- When switching another root device, initrd would pivot_root and then
|
|
umount the ramdisk. But initramfs is rootfs: you can neither pivot_root
|
|
rootfs, nor unmount it. Instead delete everything out of rootfs to
|
|
free up the space (find -xdev / -exec rm '{}' ';'), overmount rootfs
|
|
with the new root (cd /newmount; mount --move . /; chroot .), attach
|
|
stdin/stdout/stderr to the new /dev/console, and exec the new init.
|
|
|
|
Since this is a remarkably persnickity process (and involves deleting
|
|
commands before you can run them), the klibc package introduced a helper
|
|
program (utils/run_init.c) to do all this for you. Most other packages
|
|
(such as busybox) have named this command "switch_root".
|
|
|
|
Populating initramfs:
|
|
---------------------
|
|
|
|
The 2.6 kernel build process always creates a gzipped cpio format initramfs
|
|
archive and links it into the resulting kernel binary. By default, this
|
|
archive is empty (consuming 134 bytes on x86). The config option
|
|
CONFIG_INITRAMFS_SOURCE (for some reason buried under devices->block devices
|
|
in menuconfig, and living in usr/Kconfig) can be used to specify a source for
|
|
the initramfs archive, which will automatically be incorporated into the
|
|
resulting binary. This option can point to an existing gzipped cpio archive, a
|
|
directory containing files to be archived, or a text file specification such
|
|
as the following example:
|
|
|
|
dir /dev 755 0 0
|
|
nod /dev/console 644 0 0 c 5 1
|
|
nod /dev/loop0 644 0 0 b 7 0
|
|
dir /bin 755 1000 1000
|
|
slink /bin/sh busybox 777 0 0
|
|
file /bin/busybox initramfs/busybox 755 0 0
|
|
dir /proc 755 0 0
|
|
dir /sys 755 0 0
|
|
dir /mnt 755 0 0
|
|
file /init initramfs/init.sh 755 0 0
|
|
|
|
Run "usr/gen_init_cpio" (after the kernel build) to get a usage message
|
|
documenting the above file format.
|
|
|
|
One advantage of the text file is that root access is not required to
|
|
set permissions or create device nodes in the new archive. (Note that those
|
|
two example "file" entries expect to find files named "init.sh" and "busybox" in
|
|
a directory called "initramfs", under the linux-2.6.* directory. See
|
|
Documentation/early-userspace/README for more details.)
|
|
|
|
The kernel does not depend on external cpio tools, gen_init_cpio is created
|
|
from usr/gen_init_cpio.c which is entirely self-contained, and the kernel's
|
|
boot-time extractor is also (obviously) self-contained. However, if you _do_
|
|
happen to have cpio installed, the following command line can extract the
|
|
generated cpio image back into its component files:
|
|
|
|
cpio -i -d -H newc -F initramfs_data.cpio --no-absolute-filenames
|
|
|
|
Contents of initramfs:
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
If you don't already understand what shared libraries, devices, and paths
|
|
you need to get a minimal root filesystem up and running, here are some
|
|
references:
|
|
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Bootdisk-HOWTO/
|
|
http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/From-PowerUp-To-Bash-Prompt-HOWTO.html
|
|
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/view/stable/
|
|
|
|
The "klibc" package (http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/klibc) is
|
|
designed to be a tiny C library to statically link early userspace
|
|
code against, along with some related utilities. It is BSD licensed.
|
|
|
|
I use uClibc (http://www.uclibc.org) and busybox (http://www.busybox.net)
|
|
myself. These are LGPL and GPL, respectively. (A self-contained initramfs
|
|
package is planned for the busybox 1.2 release.)
|
|
|
|
In theory you could use glibc, but that's not well suited for small embedded
|
|
uses like this. (A "hello world" program statically linked against glibc is
|
|
over 400k. With uClibc it's 7k. Also note that glibc dlopens libnss to do
|
|
name lookups, even when otherwise statically linked.)
|
|
|
|
Why cpio rather than tar?
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
This decision was made back in December, 2001. The discussion started here:
|
|
|
|
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.2/1538.html
|
|
|
|
And spawned a second thread (specifically on tar vs cpio), starting here:
|
|
|
|
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.2/1587.html
|
|
|
|
The quick and dirty summary version (which is no substitute for reading
|
|
the above threads) is:
|
|
|
|
1) cpio is a standard. It's decades old (from the AT&T days), and already
|
|
widely used on Linux (inside RPM, Red Hat's device driver disks). Here's
|
|
a Linux Journal article about it from 1996:
|
|
|
|
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/1213
|
|
|
|
It's not as popular as tar because the traditional cpio command line tools
|
|
require _truly_hideous_ command line arguments. But that says nothing
|
|
either way about the archive format, and there are alternative tools,
|
|
such as:
|
|
|
|
http://freshmeat.net/projects/afio/
|
|
|
|
2) The cpio archive format chosen by the kernel is simpler and cleaner (and
|
|
thus easier to create and parse) than any of the (literally dozens of)
|
|
various tar archive formats. The complete initramfs archive format is
|
|
explained in buffer-format.txt, created in usr/gen_init_cpio.c, and
|
|
extracted in init/initramfs.c. All three together come to less than 26k
|
|
total of human-readable text.
|
|
|
|
3) The GNU project standardizing on tar is approximately as relevant as
|
|
Windows standardizing on zip. Linux is not part of either, and is free
|
|
to make its own technical decisions.
|
|
|
|
4) Since this is a kernel internal format, it could easily have been
|
|
something brand new. The kernel provides its own tools to create and
|
|
extract this format anyway. Using an existing standard was preferable,
|
|
but not essential.
|
|
|
|
5) Al Viro made the decision (quote: "tar is ugly as hell and not going to be
|
|
supported on the kernel side"):
|
|
|
|
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.2/1540.html
|
|
|
|
explained his reasoning:
|
|
|
|
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.2/1550.html
|
|
http://www.uwsg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0112.2/1638.html
|
|
|
|
and, most importantly, designed and implemented the initramfs code.
|
|
|
|
Future directions:
|
|
------------------
|
|
|
|
Today (2.6.14), initramfs is always compiled in, but not always used. The
|
|
kernel falls back to legacy boot code that is reached only if initramfs does
|
|
not contain an /init program. The fallback is legacy code, there to ensure a
|
|
smooth transition and allowing early boot functionality to gradually move to
|
|
"early userspace" (I.E. initramfs).
|
|
|
|
The move to early userspace is necessary because finding and mounting the real
|
|
root device is complex. Root partitions can span multiple devices (raid or
|
|
separate journal). They can be out on the network (requiring dhcp, setting a
|
|
specific mac address, logging into a server, etc). They can live on removable
|
|
media, with dynamically allocated major/minor numbers and persistent naming
|
|
issues requiring a full udev implementation to sort out. They can be
|
|
compressed, encrypted, copy-on-write, loopback mounted, strangely partitioned,
|
|
and so on.
|
|
|
|
This kind of complexity (which inevitably includes policy) is rightly handled
|
|
in userspace. Both klibc and busybox/uClibc are working on simple initramfs
|
|
packages to drop into a kernel build, and when standard solutions are ready
|
|
and widely deployed, the kernel's legacy early boot code will become obsolete
|
|
and a candidate for the feature removal schedule.
|
|
|
|
But that's a while off yet.
|