mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-21 11:44:01 +08:00
4ea7772f82
Lockdep is complaining about UDF: ============================================= [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ] 3.12.0+ #16 Not tainted --------------------------------------------- ln/7386 is trying to acquire lock: (&ei->i_data_sem){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff8142f06d>] udf_get_block+0x8d/0x130 but task is already holding lock: (&ei->i_data_sem){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81431a8d>] udf_symlink+0x8d/0x690 other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 ---- lock(&ei->i_data_sem); lock(&ei->i_data_sem); *** DEADLOCK *** This is because we hold i_data_sem of the symlink inode while calling udf_add_entry() for the directory. I don't think this can ever lead to deadlocks since we never hold i_data_sem for two inodes in any other place. The fix is simple - move unlock of i_data_sem for symlink inode up. We don't need it for anything when linking symlink inode to directory. Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| balloc.c | ||
| dir.c | ||
| directory.c | ||
| ecma_167.h | ||
| file.c | ||
| ialloc.c | ||
| inode.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| lowlevel.c | ||
| Makefile | ||
| misc.c | ||
| namei.c | ||
| osta_udf.h | ||
| partition.c | ||
| super.c | ||
| symlink.c | ||
| truncate.c | ||
| udf_i.h | ||
| udf_sb.h | ||
| udfdecl.h | ||
| udfend.h | ||
| udftime.c | ||
| unicode.c | ||