2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-14 16:23:51 +08:00
linux-next/include/linux/topology.h
Barry Song 778c558f49 sched: Add cluster scheduler level in core and related Kconfig for ARM64
This patch adds scheduler level for clusters and automatically enables
the load balance among clusters. It will directly benefit a lot of
workload which loves more resources such as memory bandwidth, caches.

Testing has widely been done in two different hardware configurations of
Kunpeng920:

 24 cores in one NUMA(6 clusters in each NUMA node);
 32 cores in one NUMA(8 clusters in each NUMA node)

Workload is running on either one NUMA node or four NUMA nodes, thus,
this can estimate the effect of cluster spreading w/ and w/o NUMA load
balance.

* Stream benchmark:

4threads stream (on 1NUMA * 24cores = 24cores)
                stream                 stream
                w/o patch              w/ patch
MB/sec copy     29929.64 (   0.00%)    32932.68 (  10.03%)
MB/sec scale    29861.10 (   0.00%)    32710.58 (   9.54%)
MB/sec add      27034.42 (   0.00%)    32400.68 (  19.85%)
MB/sec triad    27225.26 (   0.00%)    31965.36 (  17.41%)

6threads stream (on 1NUMA * 24cores = 24cores)
                stream                 stream
                w/o patch              w/ patch
MB/sec copy     40330.24 (   0.00%)    42377.68 (   5.08%)
MB/sec scale    40196.42 (   0.00%)    42197.90 (   4.98%)
MB/sec add      37427.00 (   0.00%)    41960.78 (  12.11%)
MB/sec triad    37841.36 (   0.00%)    42513.64 (  12.35%)

12threads stream (on 1NUMA * 24cores = 24cores)
                stream                 stream
                w/o patch              w/ patch
MB/sec copy     52639.82 (   0.00%)    53818.04 (   2.24%)
MB/sec scale    52350.30 (   0.00%)    53253.38 (   1.73%)
MB/sec add      53607.68 (   0.00%)    55198.82 (   2.97%)
MB/sec triad    54776.66 (   0.00%)    56360.40 (   2.89%)

Thus, it could help memory-bound workload especially under medium load.
Similar improvement is also seen in lkp-pbzip2:

* lkp-pbzip2 benchmark

2-96 threads (on 4NUMA * 24cores = 96cores)
                  lkp-pbzip2              lkp-pbzip2
                  w/o patch               w/ patch
Hmean     tput-2   11062841.57 (   0.00%)  11341817.51 *   2.52%*
Hmean     tput-5   26815503.70 (   0.00%)  27412872.65 *   2.23%*
Hmean     tput-8   41873782.21 (   0.00%)  43326212.92 *   3.47%*
Hmean     tput-12  61875980.48 (   0.00%)  64578337.51 *   4.37%*
Hmean     tput-21 105814963.07 (   0.00%) 111381851.01 *   5.26%*
Hmean     tput-30 150349470.98 (   0.00%) 156507070.73 *   4.10%*
Hmean     tput-48 237195937.69 (   0.00%) 242353597.17 *   2.17%*
Hmean     tput-79 360252509.37 (   0.00%) 362635169.23 *   0.66%*
Hmean     tput-96 394571737.90 (   0.00%) 400952978.48 *   1.62%*

2-24 threads (on 1NUMA * 24cores = 24cores)
                 lkp-pbzip2               lkp-pbzip2
                 w/o patch                w/ patch
Hmean     tput-2   11071705.49 (   0.00%)  11296869.10 *   2.03%*
Hmean     tput-4   20782165.19 (   0.00%)  21949232.15 *   5.62%*
Hmean     tput-6   30489565.14 (   0.00%)  33023026.96 *   8.31%*
Hmean     tput-8   40376495.80 (   0.00%)  42779286.27 *   5.95%*
Hmean     tput-12  61264033.85 (   0.00%)  62995632.78 *   2.83%*
Hmean     tput-18  86697139.39 (   0.00%)  86461545.74 (  -0.27%)
Hmean     tput-24 104854637.04 (   0.00%) 104522649.46 *  -0.32%*

In the case of 6 threads and 8 threads, we see the greatest performance
improvement.

Similar improvement can be seen on lkp-pixz though the improvement is
smaller:

* lkp-pixz benchmark

2-24 threads lkp-pixz (on 1NUMA * 24cores = 24cores)
                  lkp-pixz               lkp-pixz
                  w/o patch              w/ patch
Hmean     tput-2   6486981.16 (   0.00%)  6561515.98 *   1.15%*
Hmean     tput-4  11645766.38 (   0.00%) 11614628.43 (  -0.27%)
Hmean     tput-6  15429943.96 (   0.00%) 15957350.76 *   3.42%*
Hmean     tput-8  19974087.63 (   0.00%) 20413746.98 *   2.20%*
Hmean     tput-12 28172068.18 (   0.00%) 28751997.06 *   2.06%*
Hmean     tput-18 39413409.54 (   0.00%) 39896830.55 *   1.23%*
Hmean     tput-24 49101815.85 (   0.00%) 49418141.47 *   0.64%*

* SPECrate benchmark

4,8,16 copies mcf_r(on 1NUMA * 32cores = 32cores)
		Base     	 	Base
		Run Time   	 	Rate
		-------  	 	---------
4 Copies	w/o 580 (w/ 570)       	w/o 11.1 (w/ 11.3)
8 Copies	w/o 647 (w/ 605)       	w/o 20.0 (w/ 21.4, +7%)
16 Copies	w/o 844 (w/ 844)       	w/o 30.6 (w/ 30.6)

32 Copies(on 4NUMA * 32 cores = 128cores)
[w/o patch]
                 Base     Base        Base
Benchmarks       Copies  Run Time     Rate
--------------- -------  ---------  ---------
500.perlbench_r      32        584       87.2  *
502.gcc_r            32        503       90.2  *
505.mcf_r            32        745       69.4  *
520.omnetpp_r        32       1031       40.7  *
523.xalancbmk_r      32        597       56.6  *
525.x264_r            1         --            CE
531.deepsjeng_r      32        336      109    *
541.leela_r          32        556       95.4  *
548.exchange2_r      32        513      163    *
557.xz_r             32        530       65.2  *
 Est. SPECrate2017_int_base              80.3

[w/ patch]
                  Base     Base        Base
Benchmarks       Copies  Run Time     Rate
--------------- -------  ---------  ---------
500.perlbench_r      32        580      87.8 (+0.688%)  *
502.gcc_r            32        477      95.1 (+5.432%)  *
505.mcf_r            32        644      80.3 (+13.574%) *
520.omnetpp_r        32        942      44.6 (+9.58%)   *
523.xalancbmk_r      32        560      60.4 (+6.714%%) *
525.x264_r            1         --           CE
531.deepsjeng_r      32        337      109  (+0.000%) *
541.leela_r          32        554      95.6 (+0.210%) *
548.exchange2_r      32        515      163  (+0.000%) *
557.xz_r             32        524      66.0 (+1.227%) *
 Est. SPECrate2017_int_base              83.7 (+4.062%)

On the other hand, it is slightly helpful to CPU-bound tasks like
kernbench:

* 24-96 threads kernbench (on 4NUMA * 24cores = 96cores)
                     kernbench              kernbench
                     w/o cluster            w/ cluster
Min       user-24    12054.67 (   0.00%)    12024.19 (   0.25%)
Min       syst-24     1751.51 (   0.00%)     1731.68 (   1.13%)
Min       elsp-24      600.46 (   0.00%)      598.64 (   0.30%)
Min       user-48    12361.93 (   0.00%)    12315.32 (   0.38%)
Min       syst-48     1917.66 (   0.00%)     1892.73 (   1.30%)
Min       elsp-48      333.96 (   0.00%)      332.57 (   0.42%)
Min       user-96    12922.40 (   0.00%)    12921.17 (   0.01%)
Min       syst-96     2143.94 (   0.00%)     2110.39 (   1.56%)
Min       elsp-96      211.22 (   0.00%)      210.47 (   0.36%)
Amean     user-24    12063.99 (   0.00%)    12030.78 *   0.28%*
Amean     syst-24     1755.20 (   0.00%)     1735.53 *   1.12%*
Amean     elsp-24      601.60 (   0.00%)      600.19 (   0.23%)
Amean     user-48    12362.62 (   0.00%)    12315.56 *   0.38%*
Amean     syst-48     1921.59 (   0.00%)     1894.95 *   1.39%*
Amean     elsp-48      334.10 (   0.00%)      332.82 *   0.38%*
Amean     user-96    12925.27 (   0.00%)    12922.63 (   0.02%)
Amean     syst-96     2146.66 (   0.00%)     2122.20 *   1.14%*
Amean     elsp-96      211.96 (   0.00%)      211.79 (   0.08%)

Note this patch isn't an universal win, it might hurt those workload
which can benefit from packing. Though tasks which want to take
advantages of lower communication latency of one cluster won't
necessarily been packed in one cluster while kernel is not aware of
clusters, they have some chance to be randomly packed. But this
patch will make them more likely spread.

Signed-off-by: Barry Song <song.bao.hua@hisilicon.com>
Tested-by: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
2021-10-15 11:25:16 +02:00

229 lines
5.6 KiB
C

/*
* include/linux/topology.h
*
* Written by: Matthew Dobson, IBM Corporation
*
* Copyright (C) 2002, IBM Corp.
*
* All rights reserved.
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
* the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
* (at your option) any later version.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, GOOD TITLE or
* NON INFRINGEMENT. See the GNU General Public License for more
* details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
* Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
*
* Send feedback to <colpatch@us.ibm.com>
*/
#ifndef _LINUX_TOPOLOGY_H
#define _LINUX_TOPOLOGY_H
#include <linux/arch_topology.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
#include <linux/bitops.h>
#include <linux/mmzone.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/percpu.h>
#include <asm/topology.h>
#ifndef nr_cpus_node
#define nr_cpus_node(node) cpumask_weight(cpumask_of_node(node))
#endif
#define for_each_node_with_cpus(node) \
for_each_online_node(node) \
if (nr_cpus_node(node))
int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
/* Conform to ACPI 2.0 SLIT distance definitions */
#define LOCAL_DISTANCE 10
#define REMOTE_DISTANCE 20
#define DISTANCE_BITS 8
#ifndef node_distance
#define node_distance(from,to) ((from) == (to) ? LOCAL_DISTANCE : REMOTE_DISTANCE)
#endif
#ifndef RECLAIM_DISTANCE
/*
* If the distance between nodes in a system is larger than RECLAIM_DISTANCE
* (in whatever arch specific measurement units returned by node_distance())
* and node_reclaim_mode is enabled then the VM will only call node_reclaim()
* on nodes within this distance.
*/
#define RECLAIM_DISTANCE 30
#endif
/*
* The following tunable allows platforms to override the default node
* reclaim distance (RECLAIM_DISTANCE) if remote memory accesses are
* sufficiently fast that the default value actually hurts
* performance.
*
* AMD EPYC machines use this because even though the 2-hop distance
* is 32 (3.2x slower than a local memory access) performance actually
* *improves* if allowed to reclaim memory and load balance tasks
* between NUMA nodes 2-hops apart.
*/
extern int __read_mostly node_reclaim_distance;
#ifndef PENALTY_FOR_NODE_WITH_CPUS
#define PENALTY_FOR_NODE_WITH_CPUS (1)
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID
DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, numa_node);
#ifndef numa_node_id
/* Returns the number of the current Node. */
static inline int numa_node_id(void)
{
return raw_cpu_read(numa_node);
}
#endif
#ifndef cpu_to_node
static inline int cpu_to_node(int cpu)
{
return per_cpu(numa_node, cpu);
}
#endif
#ifndef set_numa_node
static inline void set_numa_node(int node)
{
this_cpu_write(numa_node, node);
}
#endif
#ifndef set_cpu_numa_node
static inline void set_cpu_numa_node(int cpu, int node)
{
per_cpu(numa_node, cpu) = node;
}
#endif
#else /* !CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID */
/* Returns the number of the current Node. */
#ifndef numa_node_id
static inline int numa_node_id(void)
{
return cpu_to_node(raw_smp_processor_id());
}
#endif
#endif /* [!]CONFIG_USE_PERCPU_NUMA_NODE_ID */
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES
/*
* N.B., Do NOT reference the '_numa_mem_' per cpu variable directly.
* It will not be defined when CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES is not defined.
* Use the accessor functions set_numa_mem(), numa_mem_id() and cpu_to_mem().
*/
DECLARE_PER_CPU(int, _numa_mem_);
#ifndef set_numa_mem
static inline void set_numa_mem(int node)
{
this_cpu_write(_numa_mem_, node);
}
#endif
#ifndef numa_mem_id
/* Returns the number of the nearest Node with memory */
static inline int numa_mem_id(void)
{
return raw_cpu_read(_numa_mem_);
}
#endif
#ifndef cpu_to_mem
static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
{
return per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu);
}
#endif
#ifndef set_cpu_numa_mem
static inline void set_cpu_numa_mem(int cpu, int node)
{
per_cpu(_numa_mem_, cpu) = node;
}
#endif
#else /* !CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES */
#ifndef numa_mem_id
/* Returns the number of the nearest Node with memory */
static inline int numa_mem_id(void)
{
return numa_node_id();
}
#endif
#ifndef cpu_to_mem
static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
{
return cpu_to_node(cpu);
}
#endif
#endif /* [!]CONFIG_HAVE_MEMORYLESS_NODES */
#ifndef topology_physical_package_id
#define topology_physical_package_id(cpu) ((void)(cpu), -1)
#endif
#ifndef topology_die_id
#define topology_die_id(cpu) ((void)(cpu), -1)
#endif
#ifndef topology_cluster_id
#define topology_cluster_id(cpu) ((void)(cpu), -1)
#endif
#ifndef topology_core_id
#define topology_core_id(cpu) ((void)(cpu), 0)
#endif
#ifndef topology_sibling_cpumask
#define topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu) cpumask_of(cpu)
#endif
#ifndef topology_core_cpumask
#define topology_core_cpumask(cpu) cpumask_of(cpu)
#endif
#ifndef topology_cluster_cpumask
#define topology_cluster_cpumask(cpu) cpumask_of(cpu)
#endif
#ifndef topology_die_cpumask
#define topology_die_cpumask(cpu) cpumask_of(cpu)
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) && !defined(cpu_smt_mask)
static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)
{
return topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu);
}
#endif
#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_CLUSTER) && !defined(cpu_cluster_mask)
static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_cluster_mask(int cpu)
{
return topology_cluster_cpumask(cpu);
}
#endif
static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_cpu_mask(int cpu)
{
return cpumask_of_node(cpu_to_node(cpu));
}
#endif /* _LINUX_TOPOLOGY_H */