mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-26 22:24:09 +08:00
7fc986d8a9
Aaron reported that a 32-bit x86 kernel with Physical Address Extension
(PAE) support complains about bridge prefetchable memory windows above 4GB:
pci_bus 0000:00: root bus resource [mem 0x380000000000-0x383fffffffff]
...
pci 0000:03:00.0: reg 0x10: [mem 0x383fffc00000-0x383fffdfffff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:03:00.0: reg 0x20: [mem 0x383fffe04000-0x383fffe07fff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:03:00.1: reg 0x10: [mem 0x383fffa00000-0x383fffbfffff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:03:00.1: reg 0x20: [mem 0x383fffe00000-0x383fffe03fff 64bit pref]
pci 0000:00:02.2: PCI bridge to [bus 03-04]
pci 0000:00:02.2: bridge window [io 0x1000-0x1fff]
pci 0000:00:02.2: bridge window [mem 0x91900000-0x91cfffff]
pci 0000:00:02.2: can't handle 64-bit address space for bridge
In this kernel, unsigned long is 32 bits and dma_addr_t is 64 bits.
Previously we used "unsigned long" to hold the bridge window address. But
this is a bus address, so we should use dma_addr_t instead.
Use dma_addr_t to hold the bridge window base and limit.
The question of whether the CPU can actually *address* the window is
separate and depends on what the physical address space of the CPU is and
whether the host bridge does any address translation.
[bhelgaas: fix "shift count > width of type", changelog, stable tag]
Fixes:
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| host | ||
| hotplug | ||
| pcie | ||
| access.c | ||
| ats.c | ||
| bus.c | ||
| host-bridge.c | ||
| hotplug-pci.c | ||
| htirq.c | ||
| ioapic.c | ||
| iov.c | ||
| irq.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| msi.c | ||
| of.c | ||
| pci-acpi.c | ||
| pci-driver.c | ||
| pci-label.c | ||
| pci-stub.c | ||
| pci-sysfs.c | ||
| pci.c | ||
| pci.h | ||
| probe.c | ||
| proc.c | ||
| quirks.c | ||
| remove.c | ||
| rom.c | ||
| search.c | ||
| setup-bus.c | ||
| setup-irq.c | ||
| setup-res.c | ||
| slot.c | ||
| syscall.c | ||
| vc.c | ||
| vpd.c | ||
| xen-pcifront.c | ||