mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-20 11:13:58 +08:00
6c33eb3997
When ACPI && NUMA, pxm_to_node is used and it exists in drivers/acpi/numa.c Tony said: The patch makes sense ... if you pick both of "ACPI" and "NUMA", then you need (and should automatically be given) ACPI_NUMA too. The only open question is whether there is a better way of getting there. Perhaps with less configuration options in the first place? We are heading towards a future where so many systems will be NUMA that there would seem to be little benefit in keeping ACPI_NUMA separate from ACPI ... but perhaps we aren't quite there yet. Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujtisu.com> Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> Acked-by: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| alpha | ||
| arm | ||
| arm26 | ||
| avr32 | ||
| cris | ||
| frv | ||
| h8300 | ||
| i386 | ||
| ia64 | ||
| m32r | ||
| m68k | ||
| m68knommu | ||
| mips | ||
| parisc | ||
| powerpc | ||
| ppc | ||
| s390 | ||
| sh | ||
| sh64 | ||
| sparc | ||
| sparc64 | ||
| um | ||
| v850 | ||
| x86_64 | ||
| xtensa | ||