mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-27 14:43:58 +08:00
5f97f7f940
This adds support for the Atmel AVR32 architecture as well as the AT32AP7000 CPU and the AT32STK1000 development board. AVR32 is a new high-performance 32-bit RISC microprocessor core, designed for cost-sensitive embedded applications, with particular emphasis on low power consumption and high code density. The AVR32 architecture is not binary compatible with earlier 8-bit AVR architectures. The AVR32 architecture, including the instruction set, is described by the AVR32 Architecture Manual, available from http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc32000.pdf The Atmel AT32AP7000 is the first CPU implementing the AVR32 architecture. It features a 7-stage pipeline, 16KB instruction and data caches and a full Memory Management Unit. It also comes with a large set of integrated peripherals, many of which are shared with the AT91 ARM-based controllers from Atmel. Full data sheet is available from http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc32003.pdf while the CPU core implementation including caches and MMU is documented by the AVR32 AP Technical Reference, available from http://www.atmel.com/dyn/resources/prod_documents/doc32001.pdf Information about the AT32STK1000 development board can be found at http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/tools_card.asp?tool_id=3918 including a BSP CD image with an earlier version of this patch, development tools (binaries and source/patches) and a root filesystem image suitable for booting from SD card. Alternatively, there's a preliminary "getting started" guide available at http://avr32linux.org/twiki/bin/view/Main/GettingStarted which provides links to the sources and patches you will need in order to set up a cross-compiling environment for avr32-linux. This patch, as well as the other patches included with the BSP and the toolchain patches, is actively supported by Atmel Corporation. [dmccr@us.ibm.com: Fix more pxx_page macro locations] [bunk@stusta.de: fix `make defconfig'] Signed-off-by: Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@atmel.com> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Signed-off-by: Dave McCracken <dmccr@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
149 lines
4.6 KiB
C
149 lines
4.6 KiB
C
/*
|
|
* AVR32 sempahore implementation.
|
|
*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2004-2006 Atmel Corporation
|
|
*
|
|
* Based on linux/arch/i386/kernel/semaphore.c
|
|
* Copyright (C) 1999 Linus Torvalds
|
|
*
|
|
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
|
|
* it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
|
|
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
#include <linux/errno.h>
|
|
#include <linux/module.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <asm/semaphore.h>
|
|
#include <asm/atomic.h>
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Semaphores are implemented using a two-way counter:
|
|
* The "count" variable is decremented for each process
|
|
* that tries to acquire the semaphore, while the "sleeping"
|
|
* variable is a count of such acquires.
|
|
*
|
|
* Notably, the inline "up()" and "down()" functions can
|
|
* efficiently test if they need to do any extra work (up
|
|
* needs to do something only if count was negative before
|
|
* the increment operation.
|
|
*
|
|
* "sleeping" and the contention routine ordering is protected
|
|
* by the spinlock in the semaphore's waitqueue head.
|
|
*
|
|
* Note that these functions are only called when there is
|
|
* contention on the lock, and as such all this is the
|
|
* "non-critical" part of the whole semaphore business. The
|
|
* critical part is the inline stuff in <asm/semaphore.h>
|
|
* where we want to avoid any extra jumps and calls.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Logic:
|
|
* - only on a boundary condition do we need to care. When we go
|
|
* from a negative count to a non-negative, we wake people up.
|
|
* - when we go from a non-negative count to a negative do we
|
|
* (a) synchronize with the "sleeper" count and (b) make sure
|
|
* that we're on the wakeup list before we synchronize so that
|
|
* we cannot lose wakeup events.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
void __up(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
wake_up(&sem->wait);
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__up);
|
|
|
|
void __sched __down(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
|
|
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
|
|
add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
|
|
|
|
sem->sleepers++;
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
|
|
* playing, because we own the spinlock in
|
|
* the wait_queue_head.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (atomic_add_return(sleepers - 1, &sem->count) >= 0) {
|
|
sem->sleepers = 0;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
schedule();
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
|
|
tsk->state = TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE;
|
|
}
|
|
remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
|
|
wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
|
|
tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down);
|
|
|
|
int __sched __down_interruptible(struct semaphore *sem)
|
|
{
|
|
int retval = 0;
|
|
struct task_struct *tsk = current;
|
|
DECLARE_WAITQUEUE(wait, tsk);
|
|
unsigned long flags;
|
|
|
|
tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
|
|
add_wait_queue_exclusive_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
|
|
|
|
sem->sleepers++;
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
int sleepers = sem->sleepers;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* With signals pending, this turns into the trylock
|
|
* failure case - we won't be sleeping, and we can't
|
|
* get the lock as it has contention. Just correct the
|
|
* count and exit.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (signal_pending(current)) {
|
|
retval = -EINTR;
|
|
sem->sleepers = 0;
|
|
atomic_add(sleepers, &sem->count);
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Add "everybody else" into it. They aren't
|
|
* playing, because we own the spinlock in
|
|
* the wait_queue_head.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (atomic_add_return(sleepers - 1, &sem->count) >= 0) {
|
|
sem->sleepers = 0;
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
sem->sleepers = 1; /* us - see -1 above */
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
schedule();
|
|
|
|
spin_lock_irqsave(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
|
|
tsk->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
|
|
}
|
|
remove_wait_queue_locked(&sem->wait, &wait);
|
|
wake_up_locked(&sem->wait);
|
|
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sem->wait.lock, flags);
|
|
|
|
tsk->state = TASK_RUNNING;
|
|
return retval;
|
|
}
|
|
EXPORT_SYMBOL(__down_interruptible);
|