mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-18 02:04:05 +08:00
dedc58e067
The peer may be expecting a reply having sent a request and then done a shutdown(SHUT_WR), so tearing down the whole socket at this point seems wrong and breaks for me with a client which does a SHUT_WR. Looking at other socket family's stream_recvmsg callbacks doing a shutdown here does not seem to be the norm and removing it does not seem to have had any adverse effects that I can see. I'm using Stefan's RFC virtio transport patches, I'm unsure of the impact on the vmci transport. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@docker.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: Andy King <acking@vmware.com> Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com> Cc: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com> Cc: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| af_vsock.c | ||
| Kconfig | ||
| Makefile | ||
| vmci_transport_notify_qstate.c | ||
| vmci_transport_notify.c | ||
| vmci_transport_notify.h | ||
| vmci_transport.c | ||
| vmci_transport.h | ||
| vsock_addr.c | ||