mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-21 19:53:59 +08:00
7a865277fb
The core pin controller bindings define: * The fact that pin controllers expose pin configurations as nodes in device tree. * That the bindings for those pin configuration nodes is defined by the individual pin controller drivers. * A standardized set of properties for client devices to define numbered or named pin configuration states, each referring to some number of the afore-mentioned pin configuration nodes. * That the bindings for the client devices determines the set of numbered or named states that must exist. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
129 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
129 lines
4.9 KiB
Plaintext
== Introduction ==
|
|
|
|
Hardware modules that control pin multiplexing or configuration parameters
|
|
such as pull-up/down, tri-state, drive-strength etc are designated as pin
|
|
controllers. Each pin controller must be represented as a node in device tree,
|
|
just like any other hardware module.
|
|
|
|
Hardware modules whose signals are affected by pin configuration are
|
|
designated client devices. Again, each client device must be represented as a
|
|
node in device tree, just like any other hardware module.
|
|
|
|
For a client device to operate correctly, certain pin controllers must
|
|
set up certain specific pin configurations. Some client devices need a
|
|
single static pin configuration, e.g. set up during initialization. Others
|
|
need to reconfigure pins at run-time, for example to tri-state pins when the
|
|
device is inactive. Hence, each client device can define a set of named
|
|
states. The number and names of those states is defined by the client device's
|
|
own binding.
|
|
|
|
The common pinctrl bindings defined in this file provide an infrastructure
|
|
for client device device tree nodes to map those state names to the pin
|
|
configuration used by those states.
|
|
|
|
Note that pin controllers themselves may also be client devices of themselves.
|
|
For example, a pin controller may set up its own "active" state when the
|
|
driver loads. This would allow representing a board's static pin configuration
|
|
in a single place, rather than splitting it across multiple client device
|
|
nodes. The decision to do this or not somewhat rests with the author of
|
|
individual board device tree files, and any requirements imposed by the
|
|
bindings for the individual client devices in use by that board, i.e. whether
|
|
they require certain specific named states for dynamic pin configuration.
|
|
|
|
== Pinctrl client devices ==
|
|
|
|
For each client device individually, every pin state is assigned an integer
|
|
ID. These numbers start at 0, and are contiguous. For each state ID, a unique
|
|
property exists to define the pin configuration. Each state may also be
|
|
assigned a name. When names are used, another property exists to map from
|
|
those names to the integer IDs.
|
|
|
|
Each client device's own binding determines the set of states the must be
|
|
defined in its device tree node, and whether to define the set of state
|
|
IDs that must be provided, or whether to define the set of state names that
|
|
must be provided.
|
|
|
|
Required properties:
|
|
pinctrl-0: List of phandles, each pointing at a pin configuration
|
|
node. These referenced pin configuration nodes must be child
|
|
nodes of the pin controller that they configure. Multiple
|
|
entries may exist in this list so that multiple pin
|
|
controllers may be configured, or so that a state may be built
|
|
from multiple nodes for a single pin controller, each
|
|
contributing part of the overall configuration. See the next
|
|
section of this document for details of the format of these
|
|
pin configuration nodes.
|
|
|
|
In some cases, it may be useful to define a state, but for it
|
|
to be empty. This may be required when a common IP block is
|
|
used in an SoC either without a pin controller, or where the
|
|
pin controller does not affect the HW module in question. If
|
|
the binding for that IP block requires certain pin states to
|
|
exist, they must still be defined, but may be left empty.
|
|
|
|
Optional properties:
|
|
pinctrl-1: List of phandles, each pointing at a pin configuration
|
|
node within a pin controller.
|
|
...
|
|
pinctrl-n: List of phandles, each pointing at a pin configuration
|
|
node within a pin controller.
|
|
pinctrl-names: The list of names to assign states. List entry 0 defines the
|
|
name for integer state ID 0, list entry 1 for state ID 1, and
|
|
so on.
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
/* For a client device requiring named states */
|
|
device {
|
|
pinctrl-names = "active", "idle";
|
|
pinctrl-0 = <&state_0_node_a>;
|
|
pinctrl-1 = <&state_1_node_a &state_1_node_b>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/* For the same device if using state IDs */
|
|
device {
|
|
pinctrl-0 = <&state_0_node_a>;
|
|
pinctrl-1 = <&state_1_node_a &state_1_node_b>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* For an IP block whose binding supports pin configuration,
|
|
* but in use on an SoC that doesn't have any pin control hardware
|
|
*/
|
|
device {
|
|
pinctrl-names = "active", "idle";
|
|
pinctrl-0 = <>;
|
|
pinctrl-1 = <>;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
== Pin controller devices ==
|
|
|
|
Pin controller devices should contain the pin configuration nodes that client
|
|
devices reference.
|
|
|
|
For example:
|
|
|
|
pincontroller {
|
|
... /* Standard DT properties for the device itself elided */
|
|
|
|
state_0_node_a {
|
|
...
|
|
};
|
|
state_1_node_a {
|
|
...
|
|
};
|
|
state_1_node_b {
|
|
...
|
|
};
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
The contents of each of those pin configuration child nodes is defined
|
|
entirely by the binding for the individual pin controller device. There
|
|
exists no common standard for this content.
|
|
|
|
The pin configuration nodes need not be direct children of the pin controller
|
|
device; they may be grandchildren, for example. Whether this is legal, and
|
|
whether there is any interaction between the child and intermediate parent
|
|
nodes, is again defined entirely by the binding for the individual pin
|
|
controller device.
|