linux-next/Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt

What is Linux Memory Policy?

In the Linux kernel, "memory policy" determines from which node the kernel will
allocate memory in a NUMA system or in an emulated NUMA system.  Linux has
supported platforms with Non-Uniform Memory Access architectures since 2.4.?.
The current memory policy support was added to Linux 2.6 around May 2004.  This
document attempts to describe the concepts and APIs of the 2.6 memory policy
support.

Memory policies should not be confused with cpusets (Documentation/cpusets.txt)
which is an administrative mechanism for restricting the nodes from which
memory may be allocated by a set of processes. Memory policies are a
programming interface that a NUMA-aware application can take advantage of.  When
both cpusets and policies are applied to a task, the restrictions of the cpuset
takes priority.  See "MEMORY POLICIES AND CPUSETS" below for more details.

MEMORY POLICY CONCEPTS

Scope of Memory Policies

The Linux kernel supports _scopes_ of memory policy, described here from
most general to most specific:

    System Default Policy:  this policy is "hard coded" into the kernel.  It
    is the policy that governs all page allocations that aren't controlled
    by one of the more specific policy scopes discussed below.  When the
    system is "up and running", the system default policy will use "local
    allocation" described below.  However, during boot up, the system
    default policy will be set to interleave allocations across all nodes
    with "sufficient" memory, so as not to overload the initial boot node
    with boot-time allocations.

    Task/Process Policy:  this is an optional, per-task policy.  When defined
    for a specific task, this policy controls all page allocations made by or
    on behalf of the task that aren't controlled by a more specific scope.
    If a task does not define a task policy, then all page allocations that
    would have been controlled by the task policy "fall back" to the System
    Default Policy.

	The task policy applies to the entire address space of a task. Thus,
	it is inheritable, and indeed is inherited, across both fork()
	[clone() w/o the CLONE_VM flag] and exec*().  This allows a parent task
	to establish the task policy for a child task exec()'d from an
	executable image that has no awareness of memory policy.  See the
	MEMORY POLICY APIS section, below, for an overview of the system call
	that a task may use to set/change it's task/process policy.

	In a multi-threaded task, task policies apply only to the thread
	[Linux kernel task] that installs the policy and any threads
	subsequently created by that thread.  Any sibling threads existing
	at the time a new task policy is installed retain their current
	policy.

	A task policy applies only to pages allocated after the policy is
	installed.  Any pages already faulted in by the task when the task
	changes its task policy remain where they were allocated based on
	the policy at the time they were allocated.

    VMA Policy:  A "VMA" or "Virtual Memory Area" refers to a range of a task's
    virtual adddress space.  A task may define a specific policy for a range
    of its virtual address space.   See the MEMORY POLICIES APIS section,
    below, for an overview of the mbind() system call used to set a VMA
    policy.

    A VMA policy will govern the allocation of pages that back this region of
    the address space.  Any regions of the task's address space that don't
    have an explicit VMA policy will fall back to the task policy, which may
    itself fall back to the System Default Policy.

    VMA policies have a few complicating details:

	VMA policy applies ONLY to anonymous pages.  These include pages
	allocated for anonymous segments, such as the task stack and heap, and
	any regions of the address space mmap()ed with the MAP_ANONYMOUS flag.
	If a VMA policy is applied to a file mapping, it will be ignored if
	the mapping used the MAP_SHARED flag.  If the file mapping used the
	MAP_PRIVATE flag, the VMA policy will only be applied when an
	anonymous page is allocated on an attempt to write to the mapping--
	i.e., at Copy-On-Write.

	VMA policies are shared between all tasks that share a virtual address
	space--a.k.a. threads--independent of when the policy is installed; and
	they are inherited across fork().  However, because VMA policies refer
	to a specific region of a task's address space, and because the address
	space is discarded and recreated on exec*(), VMA policies are NOT
	inheritable across exec().  Thus, only NUMA-aware applications may
	use VMA policies.

	A task may install a new VMA policy on a sub-range of a previously
	mmap()ed region.  When this happens, Linux splits the existing virtual
	memory area into 2 or 3 VMAs, each with it's own policy.

	By default, VMA policy applies only to pages allocated after the policy
	is installed.  Any pages already faulted into the VMA range remain
	where they were allocated based on the policy at the time they were
	allocated.  However, since 2.6.16, Linux supports page migration via
	the mbind() system call, so that page contents can be moved to match
	a newly installed policy.

    Shared Policy:  Conceptually, shared policies apply to "memory objects"
    mapped shared into one or more tasks' distinct address spaces.  An
    application installs a shared policies the same way as VMA policies--using
    the mbind() system call specifying a range of virtual addresses that map
    the shared object.  However, unlike VMA policies, which can be considered
    to be an attribute of a range of a task's address space, shared policies
    apply directly to the shared object.  Thus, all tasks that attach to the
    object share the policy, and all pages allocated for the shared object,
    by any task, will obey the shared policy.

	As of 2.6.22, only shared memory segments, created by shmget() or
	mmap(MAP_ANONYMOUS|MAP_SHARED), support shared policy.  When shared
	policy support was added to Linux, the associated data structures were
	added to hugetlbfs shmem segments.  At the time, hugetlbfs did not
	support allocation at fault time--a.k.a lazy allocation--so hugetlbfs
	shmem segments were never "hooked up" to the shared policy support.
	Although hugetlbfs segments now support lazy allocation, their support
	for shared policy has not been completed.

	As mentioned above [re: VMA policies], allocations of page cache
	pages for regular files mmap()ed with MAP_SHARED ignore any VMA
	policy installed on the virtual address range backed by the shared
	file mapping.  Rather, shared page cache pages, including pages backing
	private mappings that have not yet been written by the task, follow
	task policy, if any, else System Default Policy.

	The shared policy infrastructure supports different policies on subset
	ranges of the shared object.  However, Linux still splits the VMA of
	the task that installs the policy for each range of distinct policy.
	Thus, different tasks that attach to a shared memory segment can have
	different VMA configurations mapping that one shared object.  This
	can be seen by examining the /proc/<pid>/numa_maps of tasks sharing
	a shared memory region, when one task has installed shared policy on
	one or more ranges of the region.

Components of Memory Policies

    A Linux memory policy is a tuple consisting of a "mode" and an optional set
    of nodes.  The mode determine the behavior of the policy, while the
    optional set of nodes can be viewed as the arguments to the behavior.

   Internally, memory policies are implemented by a reference counted
   structure, struct mempolicy.  Details of this structure will be discussed
   in context, below, as required to explain the behavior.

	Note:  in some functions AND in the struct mempolicy itself, the mode
	is called "policy".  However, to avoid confusion with the policy tuple,
	this document will continue to use the term "mode".

   Linux memory policy supports the following 4 behavioral modes:

	Default Mode--MPOL_DEFAULT:  The behavior specified by this mode is
	context or scope dependent.

	    As mentioned in the Policy Scope section above, during normal
	    system operation, the System Default Policy is hard coded to
	    contain the Default mode.

	    In this context, default mode means "local" allocation--that is
	    attempt to allocate the page from the node associated with the cpu
	    where the fault occurs.  If the "local" node has no memory, or the
	    node's memory can be exhausted [no free pages available], local
	    allocation will "fallback to"--attempt to allocate pages from--
	    "nearby" nodes, in order of increasing "distance".

		Implementation detail -- subject to change:  "Fallback" uses
		a per node list of sibling nodes--called zonelists--built at
		boot time, or when nodes or memory are added or removed from
		the system [memory hotplug].  These per node zonelist are
		constructed with nodes in order of increasing distance based
		on information provided by the platform firmware.

	    When a task/process policy or a shared policy contains the Default
	    mode, this also means "local allocation", as described above.

	    In the context of a VMA, Default mode means "fall back to task
	    policy"--which may or may not specify Default mode.  Thus, Default
	    mode can not be counted on to mean local allocation when used
	    on a non-shared region of the address space.  However, see
	    MPOL_PREFERRED below.

	    The Default mode does not use the optional set of nodes.

	MPOL_BIND:  This mode specifies that memory must come from the
	set of nodes specified by the policy.

	    The memory policy APIs do not specify an order in which the nodes
	    will be searched.  However, unlike "local allocation", the Bind
	    policy does not consider the distance between the nodes.  Rather,
	    allocations will fallback to the nodes specified by the policy in
	    order of numeric node id.  Like everything in Linux, this is subject
	    to change.

	MPOL_PREFERRED:  This mode specifies that the allocation should be
	attempted from the single node specified in the policy.  If that
	allocation fails, the kernel will search other nodes, exactly as
	it would for a local allocation that started at the preferred node
	in increasing distance from the preferred node.  "Local" allocation
	policy can be viewed as a Preferred policy that starts at the node
	containing the cpu where the allocation takes place.

	    Internally, the Preferred policy uses a single node--the
	    preferred_node member of struct mempolicy.  A "distinguished
	    value of this preferred_node, currently '-1', is interpreted
	    as "the node containing the cpu where the allocation takes
	    place"--local allocation.  This is the way to specify
	    local allocation for a specific range of addresses--i.e. for
	    VMA policies.

	MPOL_INTERLEAVED:  This mode specifies that page allocations be
	interleaved, on a page granularity, across the nodes specified in
	the policy.  This mode also behaves slightly differently, based on
	the context where it is used:

	    For allocation of anonymous pages and shared memory pages,
	    Interleave mode indexes the set of nodes specified by the policy
	    using the page offset of the faulting address into the segment
	    [VMA] containing the address modulo the number of nodes specified
	    by the policy.  It then attempts to allocate a page, starting at
	    the selected node, as if the node had been specified by a Preferred
	    policy or had been selected by a local allocation.  That is,
	    allocation will follow the per node zonelist.

	    For allocation of page cache pages, Interleave mode indexes the set
	    of nodes specified by the policy using a node counter maintained
	    per task.  This counter wraps around to the lowest specified node
	    after it reaches the highest specified node.  This will tend to
	    spread the pages out over the nodes specified by the policy based
	    on the order in which they are allocated, rather than based on any
	    page offset into an address range or file.  During system boot up,
	    the temporary interleaved system default policy works in this
	    mode.

MEMORY POLICY APIs

Linux supports 3 system calls for controlling memory policy.  These APIS
always affect only the calling task, the calling task's address space, or
some shared object mapped into the calling task's address space.

	Note:  the headers that define these APIs and the parameter data types
	for user space applications reside in a package that is not part of
	the Linux kernel.  The kernel system call interfaces, with the 'sys_'
	prefix, are defined in <linux/syscalls.h>; the mode and flag
	definitions are defined in <linux/mempolicy.h>.

Set [Task] Memory Policy:

	long set_mempolicy(int mode, const unsigned long *nmask,
					unsigned long maxnode);

	Set's the calling task's "task/process memory policy" to mode
	specified by the 'mode' argument and the set of nodes defined
	by 'nmask'.  'nmask' points to a bit mask of node ids containing
	at least 'maxnode' ids.

	See the set_mempolicy(2) man page for more details


Get [Task] Memory Policy or Related Information

	long get_mempolicy(int *mode,
			   const unsigned long *nmask, unsigned long maxnode,
			   void *addr, int flags);

	Queries the "task/process memory policy" of the calling task, or
	the policy or location of a specified virtual address, depending
	on the 'flags' argument.

	See the get_mempolicy(2) man page for more details


Install VMA/Shared Policy for a Range of Task's Address Space

	long mbind(void *start, unsigned long len, int mode,
		   const unsigned long *nmask, unsigned long maxnode,
		   unsigned flags);

	mbind() installs the policy specified by (mode, nmask, maxnodes) as
	a VMA policy for the range of the calling task's address space
	specified by the 'start' and 'len' arguments.  Additional actions
	may be requested via the 'flags' argument.

	See the mbind(2) man page for more details.

MEMORY POLICY COMMAND LINE INTERFACE

Although not strictly part of the Linux implementation of memory policy,
a command line tool, numactl(8), exists that allows one to:

+ set the task policy for a specified program via set_mempolicy(2), fork(2) and
  exec(2)

+ set the shared policy for a shared memory segment via mbind(2)

The numactl(8) tool is packages with the run-time version of the library
containing the memory policy system call wrappers.  Some distributions
package the headers and compile-time libraries in a separate development
package.


MEMORY POLICIES AND CPUSETS

Memory policies work within cpusets as described above.  For memory policies
that require a node or set of nodes, the nodes are restricted to the set of
nodes whose memories are allowed by the cpuset constraints.  If the
intersection of the set of nodes specified for the policy and the set of nodes
allowed by the cpuset is the empty set, the policy is considered invalid and
cannot be installed.

The interaction of memory policies and cpusets can be problematic for a
couple of reasons:

1) the memory policy APIs take physical node id's as arguments.  However, the
   memory policy APIs do not provide a way to determine what nodes are valid
   in the context where the application is running.  An application MAY consult
   the cpuset file system [directly or via an out of tree, and not generally
   available, libcpuset API] to obtain this information, but then the
   application must be aware that it is running in a cpuset and use what are
   intended primarily as administrative APIs.

   However, as long as the policy specifies at least one node that is valid
   in the controlling cpuset, the policy can be used.

2) when tasks in two cpusets share access to a memory region, such as shared
   memory segments created by shmget() of mmap() with the MAP_ANONYMOUS and
   MAP_SHARED flags, and any of the tasks install shared policy on the region,
   only nodes whose memories are allowed in both cpusets may be used in the
   policies.  Again, obtaining this information requires "stepping outside"
   the memory policy APIs, as well as knowing in what cpusets other task might
   be attaching to the shared region, to use the cpuset information.
   Furthermore, if the cpusets' allowed memory sets are disjoint, "local"
   allocation is the only valid policy.