2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-19 10:44:14 +08:00
linux-next/tools/perf/util/rwsem.c
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 0a7c74eae3 perf tools: Provide mutex wrappers for pthreads rwlocks
Andi reported a performance drop in single threaded perf tools such as
'perf script' due to the growing number of locks being put in place to
allow for multithreaded tools, so wrap the POSIX threads rwlock routines
with the names used for such kinds of locks in the Linux kernel and then
allow for tools to ask for those locks to be used or not.

I.e. a tool may have a multithreaded phase and then switch to single
threaded, like the upcoming patches for the synthesizing of
PERF_RECORD_{FORK,MMAP,etc} for pre-existing processes to then switch to
single threaded mode in 'perf top'.

The init routines will not be conditional, this way starting as single
threaded to then move to multi threaded mode should be possible.

Reported-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170404161739.GH12903@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-09-21 13:28:06 -03:00

33 lines
674 B
C

#include "util.h"
#include "rwsem.h"
int init_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
return pthread_rwlock_init(&sem->lock, NULL);
}
int exit_rwsem(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
return pthread_rwlock_destroy(&sem->lock);
}
int down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
return perf_singlethreaded ? 0 : pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&sem->lock);
}
int up_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
return perf_singlethreaded ? 0 : pthread_rwlock_unlock(&sem->lock);
}
int down_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
return perf_singlethreaded ? 0 : pthread_rwlock_wrlock(&sem->lock);
}
int up_write(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
{
return perf_singlethreaded ? 0 : pthread_rwlock_unlock(&sem->lock);
}