renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-11-27 03:55:37 +08:00
Code
1156e9541d
linux-next/lib/dhry.h
Geert Uytterhoeven d5528cc168 lib: add Dhrystone benchmark test 
When working on SoC bring-up, (a full) userspace may not be available,
making it hard to benchmark the CPU performance of the system under
development.  Still, one may want to have a rough idea of the (relative)
performance of one or more CPU cores, especially when working on e.g.  the
clock driver that controls the CPU core clock(s).

Hence make the classical Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark available as a Linux
kernel test module, based on[1].

When built-in, this benchmark can be run without any userspace present.

Parallel runs (run on multiple CPU cores) are supported, just kick the
"run" file multiple times.

Note that the actual figures depend on the configuration options that
control compiler optimization (e.g.  CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE vs. 
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_PERFORMANCE), and on the compiler options used when
building the kernel in general.  Hence numbers may differ from those
obtained by running similar benchmarks in userspace.

[1] https://github.com/qris/dhrystone-deb.git

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/4d07ad990740a5f1e426ce4566fb514f60ec9bdd.1670509558.git.geert+renesas@glider.be
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
[geert+renesas@glider.be: fix uninitialized use of ret]
 Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2212190857310.137329@ramsan.of.borg
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
2023-02-02 22:50:01 -08:00

359 lines
14 KiB
C
Raw Blame History

/* SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) */
/*
****************************************************************************
*
* "DHRYSTONE" Benchmark Program
* -----------------------------
*
* Version: C, Version 2.1
*
* File: dhry.h (part 1 of 3)
*
* Date: May 25, 1988
*
* Author: Reinhold P. Weicker
* Siemens AG, AUT E 51
* Postfach 3220
* 8520 Erlangen
* Germany (West)
* Phone: [+49]-9131-7-20330
* (8-17 Central European Time)
* Usenet: ..!mcsun!unido!estevax!weicker
*
* Original Version (in Ada) published in
* "Communications of the ACM" vol. 27., no. 10 (Oct. 1984),
* pp. 1013 - 1030, together with the statistics
* on which the distribution of statements etc. is based.
*
* In this C version, the following C library functions are used:
* - strcpy, strcmp (inside the measurement loop)
* - printf, scanf (outside the measurement loop)
* In addition, Berkeley UNIX system calls "times ()" or "time ()"
* are used for execution time measurement. For measurements
* on other systems, these calls have to be changed.
*
* Collection of Results:
* Reinhold Weicker (address see above) and
*
* Rick Richardson
* PC Research. Inc.
* 94 Apple Orchard Drive
* Tinton Falls, NJ 07724
* Phone: (201) 389-8963 (9-17 EST)
* Usenet: ...!uunet!pcrat!rick
*
* Please send results to Rick Richardson and/or Reinhold Weicker.
* Complete information should be given on hardware and software used.
* Hardware information includes: Machine type, CPU, type and size
* of caches; for microprocessors: clock frequency, memory speed
* (number of wait states).
* Software information includes: Compiler (and runtime library)
* manufacturer and version, compilation switches, OS version.
* The Operating System version may give an indication about the
* compiler; Dhrystone itself performs no OS calls in the measurement loop.
*
* The complete output generated by the program should be mailed
* such that at least some checks for correctness can be made.
*
***************************************************************************
*
* History: This version C/2.1 has been made for two reasons:
*
* 1) There is an obvious need for a common C version of
* Dhrystone, since C is at present the most popular system
* programming language for the class of processors
* (microcomputers, minicomputers) where Dhrystone is used most.
* There should be, as far as possible, only one C version of
* Dhrystone such that results can be compared without
* restrictions. In the past, the C versions distributed
* by Rick Richardson (Version 1.1) and by Reinhold Weicker
* had small (though not significant) differences.
*
* 2) As far as it is possible without changes to the Dhrystone
* statistics, optimizing compilers should be prevented from
* removing significant statements.
*
* This C version has been developed in cooperation with
* Rick Richardson (Tinton Falls, NJ), it incorporates many
* ideas from the "Version 1.1" distributed previously by
* him over the UNIX network Usenet.
* I also thank Chaim Benedelac (National Semiconductor),
* David Ditzel (SUN), Earl Killian and John Mashey (MIPS),
* Alan Smith and Rafael Saavedra-Barrera (UC at Berkeley)
* for their help with comments on earlier versions of the
* benchmark.
*
* Changes: In the initialization part, this version follows mostly
* Rick Richardson's version distributed via Usenet, not the
* version distributed earlier via floppy disk by Reinhold Weicker.
* As a concession to older compilers, names have been made
* unique within the first 8 characters.
* Inside the measurement loop, this version follows the
* version previously distributed by Reinhold Weicker.
*
* At several places in the benchmark, code has been added,
* but within the measurement loop only in branches that
* are not executed. The intention is that optimizing compilers
* should be prevented from moving code out of the measurement
* loop, or from removing code altogether. Since the statements
* that are executed within the measurement loop have NOT been
* changed, the numbers defining the "Dhrystone distribution"
* (distribution of statements, operand types and locality)
* still hold. Except for sophisticated optimizing compilers,
* execution times for this version should be the same as
* for previous versions.
*
* Since it has proven difficult to subtract the time for the
* measurement loop overhead in a correct way, the loop check
* has been made a part of the benchmark. This does have
* an impact - though a very minor one - on the distribution
* statistics which have been updated for this version.
*
* All changes within the measurement loop are described
* and discussed in the companion paper "Rationale for
* Dhrystone version 2".
*
* Because of the self-imposed limitation that the order and
* distribution of the executed statements should not be
* changed, there are still cases where optimizing compilers
* may not generate code for some statements. To a certain
* degree, this is unavoidable for small synthetic benchmarks.
* Users of the benchmark are advised to check code listings
* whether code is generated for all statements of Dhrystone.
*
* Version 2.1 is identical to version 2.0 distributed via
* the UNIX network Usenet in March 1988 except that it corrects
* some minor deficiencies that were found by users of version 2.0.
* The only change within the measurement loop is that a
* non-executed "else" part was added to the "if" statement in
* Func_3, and a non-executed "else" part removed from Proc_3.
*
***************************************************************************
*
* Compilation model and measurement (IMPORTANT):
*
* This C version of Dhrystone consists of three files:
* - dhry.h (this file, containing global definitions and comments)
* - dhry_1.c (containing the code corresponding to Ada package Pack_1)
* - dhry_2.c (containing the code corresponding to Ada package Pack_2)
*
* The following "ground rules" apply for measurements:
* - Separate compilation
* - No procedure merging
* - Otherwise, compiler optimizations are allowed but should be indicated
* - Default results are those without register declarations
* See the companion paper "Rationale for Dhrystone Version 2" for a more
* detailed discussion of these ground rules.
*
* For 16-Bit processors (e.g. 80186, 80286), times for all compilation
* models ("small", "medium", "large" etc.) should be given if possible,
* together with a definition of these models for the compiler system used.
*
**************************************************************************
*
* Dhrystone (C version) statistics:
*
* [Comment from the first distribution, updated for version 2.
* Note that because of language differences, the numbers are slightly
* different from the Ada version.]
*
* The following program contains statements of a high level programming
* language (here: C) in a distribution considered representative:
*
* assignments 52 (51.0 %)
* control statements 33 (32.4 %)
* procedure, function calls 17 (16.7 %)
*
* 103 statements are dynamically executed. The program is balanced with
* respect to the three aspects:
*
* - statement type
* - operand type
* - operand locality
* operand global, local, parameter, or constant.
*
* The combination of these three aspects is balanced only approximately.
*
* 1. Statement Type:
* ----------------- number
*
* V1 = V2 9
* (incl. V1 = F(..)
* V = Constant 12
* Assignment, 7
* with array element
* Assignment, 6
* with record component
* --
* 34 34
*
* X = Y +|-|"&&"|"|" Z 5
* X = Y +|-|"==" Constant 6
* X = X +|- 1 3
* X = Y *|/ Z 2
* X = Expression, 1
* two operators
* X = Expression, 1
* three operators
* --
* 18 18
*
* if .... 14
* with "else" 7
* without "else" 7
* executed 3
* not executed 4
* for ... 7 | counted every time
* while ... 4 | the loop condition
* do ... while 1 | is evaluated
* switch ... 1
* break 1
* declaration with 1
* initialization
* --
* 34 34
*
* P (...) procedure call 11
* user procedure 10
* library procedure 1
* X = F (...)
* function call 6
* user function 5
* library function 1
* --
* 17 17
* ---
* 103
*
* The average number of parameters in procedure or function calls
* is 1.82 (not counting the function values as implicit parameters).
*
*
* 2. Operators
* ------------
* number approximate
* percentage
*
* Arithmetic 32 50.8
*
* + 21 33.3
* - 7 11.1
* * 3 4.8
* / (int div) 1 1.6
*
* Comparison 27 42.8
*
* == 9 14.3
* /= 4 6.3
* > 1 1.6
* < 3 4.8
* >= 1 1.6
* <= 9 14.3
*
* Logic 4 6.3
*
* && (AND-THEN) 1 1.6
* | (OR) 1 1.6
* ! (NOT) 2 3.2
*
* -- -----
* 63 100.1
*
*
* 3. Operand Type (counted once per operand reference):
* ---------------
* number approximate
* percentage
*
* Integer 175 72.3 %
* Character 45 18.6 %
* Pointer 12 5.0 %
* String30 6 2.5 %
* Array 2 0.8 %
* Record 2 0.8 %
* --- -------
* 242 100.0 %
*
* When there is an access path leading to the final operand (e.g. a record
* component), only the final data type on the access path is counted.
*
*
* 4. Operand Locality:
* -------------------
* number approximate
* percentage
*
* local variable 114 47.1 %
* global variable 22 9.1 %
* parameter 45 18.6 %
* value 23 9.5 %
* reference 22 9.1 %
* function result 6 2.5 %
* constant 55 22.7 %
* --- -------
* 242 100.0 %
*
*
* The program does not compute anything meaningful, but it is syntactically
* and semantically correct. All variables have a value assigned to them
* before they are used as a source operand.
*
* There has been no explicit effort to account for the effects of a
* cache, or to balance the use of long or short displacements for code or
* data.
*
***************************************************************************
*/
typedef enum {
Ident_1,
Ident_2,
Ident_3,
Ident_4,
Ident_5
} Enumeration; /* for boolean and enumeration types in Ada, Pascal */
/* General definitions: */
typedef int One_Thirty;
typedef int One_Fifty;
typedef char Capital_Letter;
typedef int Boolean;
typedef char Str_30[31];
typedef int Arr_1_Dim[50];
typedef int Arr_2_Dim[50][50];
typedef struct record {
struct record *Ptr_Comp;
Enumeration Discr;
union {
struct {
Enumeration Enum_Comp;
int Int_Comp;
char Str_Comp[31];
} var_1;
struct {
Enumeration E_Comp_2;
char Str_2_Comp[31];
} var_2;
struct {
char Ch_1_Comp;
char Ch_2_Comp;
} var_3;
} variant;
} Rec_Type, *Rec_Pointer;
extern int Int_Glob;
extern char Ch_1_Glob;
void Proc_6(Enumeration Enum_Val_Par, Enumeration *Enum_Ref_Par);
void Proc_7(One_Fifty Int_1_Par_Val, One_Fifty Int_2_Par_Val,
One_Fifty *Int_Par_Ref);
void Proc_8(Arr_1_Dim Arr_1_Par_Ref, Arr_2_Dim Arr_2_Par_Ref,
int Int_1_Par_Val, int Int_2_Par_Val);
Enumeration Func_1(Capital_Letter Ch_1_Par_Val, Capital_Letter Ch_2_Par_Val);
Boolean Func_2(Str_30 Str_1_Par_Ref, Str_30 Str_2_Par_Ref);
int dhry(int n);
View Git Blame Copy Permalink