mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-29 15:43:59 +08:00
114653c759
I'm quite sure that those coefficients are real close, because while testing the biggest error compared to nvidia was around -1.5% (biggest error with right coefficients is 12.5mV / 600mV = 2%). These coefficients were REed by modifing the voltage map entries and by calculating the set voltage back until I was able to forecast which voltage nvidia sets for a given voltage map entry. With these formulars I am able to precisely predict at which exact temperature Nvidia down- or upvolts due to a changed therm reading. That's why I am quite sure these are right, or at least really really close. v4: Use better coefficients and speedo. v5: Add error message when speedo is missing. Signed-off-by: Karol Herbst <karolherbst@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Peres <martin.peres@free.fr> Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
bar | ||
bios | ||
bus | ||
clk | ||
devinit | ||
fb | ||
fuse | ||
gpio | ||
i2c | ||
ibus | ||
iccsense | ||
instmem | ||
ltc | ||
mc | ||
mmu | ||
mxm | ||
pci | ||
pmu | ||
secboot | ||
therm | ||
timer | ||
top | ||
volt | ||
Kbuild |