2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-25 05:34:00 +08:00
Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gustavo A. R. Silva
ffe7428e6d perf branch: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array
member[1][2], introduced in C99:

struct foo {
        int stuff;
        struct boo array[];
};

By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning in
case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which will
help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.

Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by this
change:

"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]

sizeof(flexible-array-member) triggers a warning because flexible array
members have incomplete type[1]. There are some instances of code in
which the sizeof operator is being incorrectly/erroneously applied to
zero-length arrays and the result is zero. Such instances may be hiding
some bugs. So, this work (flexible-array member conversions) will also
help to get completely rid of those sorts of issues.

This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle and audited _manually_.

[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200520191613.GA26869@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-05-28 10:03:27 -03:00
Kan Liang
ff165628d7 perf callchain: Stitch LBR call stack
In LBR call stack mode, the depth of reconstructed LBR call stack limits
to the number of LBR registers.

  For example, on skylake, the depth of reconstructed LBR call stack is
  always <= 32.

  # To display the perf.data header info, please use
  # --header/--header-only options.
  #
  #
  # Total Lost Samples: 0
  #
  # Samples: 6K of event 'cycles'
  # Event count (approx.): 6487119731
  #
  # Children      Self  Command          Shared Object       Symbol
  # ........  ........  ...............  ..................
  # ................................

    99.97%    99.97%  tchain_edit      tchain_edit        [.] f43
            |
             --99.64%--f11
                       f12
                       f13
                       f14
                       f15
                       f16
                       f17
                       f18
                       f19
                       f20
                       f21
                       f22
                       f23
                       f24
                       f25
                       f26
                       f27
                       f28
                       f29
                       f30
                       f31
                       f32
                       f33
                       f34
                       f35
                       f36
                       f37
                       f38
                       f39
                       f40
                       f41
                       f42
                       f43

For a call stack which is deeper than LBR limit, HW will overwrite the
LBR register with oldest branch. Only partial call stacks can be
reconstructed.

However, the overwritten LBRs may still be retrieved from previous
sample. At that moment, HW hasn't overwritten the LBR registers yet.
Perf tools can stitch those overwritten LBRs on current call stacks to
get a more complete call stack.

To determine if LBRs can be stitched, perf tools need to compare current
sample with previous sample.

- They should have identical LBR records (Same from, to and flags
  values, and the same physical index of LBR registers).

- The searching starts from the base-of-stack of current sample.

Once perf determines to stitch the previous LBRs, the corresponding LBR
cursor nodes will be copied to 'lists'.  The 'lists' is to track the LBR
cursor nodes which are going to be stitched.

When the stitching is over, the nodes will not be freed immediately.
They will be moved to 'free_lists'. Next stitching may reuse the space.
Both 'lists' and 'free_lists' will be freed when all samples are
processed.

Committer notes:

Fix the intel-pt.c initialization of the union with 'struct
branch_flags', that breaks the build with its unnamed union on older gcc
versions.

Uninline thread__free_stitch_list(), as it grew big and started dragging
includes to thread.h, so move it to thread.c where what it needs in
terms of headers are already there.

This fixes the build in several systems such as debian:experimental when
cross building to the MIPS32 architecture, i.e. in the other cases what
was needed was being included by sheer luck.

  In file included from builtin-sched.c:11:
  util/thread.h: In function 'thread__free_stitch_list':
  util/thread.h:169:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'free' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    169 |   free(pos);
        |   ^~~~
  util/thread.h:169:3: error: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'free' [-Werror]
  util/thread.h:19:1: note: include '<stdlib.h>' or provide a declaration of 'free'
     18 | #include "callchain.h"
    +++ |+#include <stdlib.h>
     19 |
  util/thread.h:174:3: error: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'free' [-Werror]
    174 |   free(pos);
        |   ^~~~
  util/thread.h:174:3: note: include '<stdlib.h>' or provide a declaration of 'free'

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200319202517.23423-13-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-04-18 09:05:01 -03:00
Kan Liang
42bbabed09 perf tools: Add hw_idx in struct branch_stack
The low level index of raw branch records for the most recent branch can
be recorded in a sample with PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX
branch_sample_type. Extend struct branch_stack to support it.

However, if the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is not applied, only nr and
entries[] will be output by kernel. The pointer of entries[] could be
wrong, since the output format is different with new struct
branch_stack.  Add a variable no_hw_idx in struct perf_sample to
indicate whether the hw_idx is output.  Add get_branch_entry() to return
corresponding pointer of entries[0].

To make dummy branch sample consistent as new branch sample, add hw_idx
in struct dummy_branch_stack for cs-etm and intel-pt.

Apply the new struct branch_stack for synthetic events as well.

Extend test case sample-parsing to support new struct branch_stack.

Committer notes:

Renamed get_branch_entries() to perf_sample__branch_entries() to have
proper namespacing and pave the way for this to be moved to libperf,
eventually.

Add 'static' to that inline as it is in a header.

Add 'hw_idx' to 'struct dummy_branch_stack' in cs-etm.c to fix the build
on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Pavel Gerasimov <pavel.gerasimov@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Slobodskoy <vitaly.slobodskoy@intel.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200228163011.19358-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2020-03-09 21:42:53 -03:00
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
fb71c86cc8 perf tools: Remove util.h from where it is not needed
Check that it is not needed and remove, fixing up some fallout for
places where it was only serving to get something else.

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-9h6dg6lsqe2usyqjh5rrues4@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-09-20 09:19:20 -03:00
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
d3300a3c4e perf symbols: Move mem_info and branch_info out of symbol.h
The mem_info struct goes to mem-events.h and branch_info goes to
branch.h, where they belong, this way we can remove several headers from
symbols.h and trim the include dependency tree more.

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-aupw71xnravcsu2xoabfmhpc@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-08-31 22:27:48 -03:00
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
f1a397f337 perf tools: Move branch structs to branch.h
We already have it, move those there from events.h so that we untangle
the header dependencies a bit more.

Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-pnbkqo8jxbi49d4f3yd3b5w3@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2019-01-25 15:12:08 +01:00
Jin Yao
a1a8bed32d perf report: Tag branch type/flag on "to" and tag cycles on "from"
Current --branch-history LBR annotation displays confused data. For
example, each cycles report is duplicated on both "from" and "to"
entries.

For example:

  perf report --branch-history --no-children --stdio

  --2.32%--main div.c:39 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M predicted:49.7% cycles:1)
            main div.c:44 (predicted:49.7% cycles:1)
            main div.c:42 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:2)
            compute_flag div.c:28 (cycles:2)
            compute_flag div.c:27 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:1)
            rand rand.c:28 (cycles:1)
            rand rand.c:28 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:1)
            __random random.c:298 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:297 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (RET CROSS_2M cycles:9)

The cycles should be tagged only on the "from". It's for the code block
that ends with "from", not for "to".

Another issue is the "predicted:49.7%" is duplicated too (tag on both
"from" and "to").

This patch tags the branch type/flag on "to" and tag the cycles on
"from".

For example:

  --2.32%--main div.c:39 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M predicted:49.7%)
            main div.c:44 (cycles:1)
            main div.c:42 (RET CROSS_2M)
            compute_flag div.c:28 (cycles:2)
            compute_flag div.c:27 (RET CROSS_2M)
            rand rand.c:28 (cycles:1)
            rand rand.c:28 (RET CROSS_2M)
            __random random.c:298 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:297 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M)
            __random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M)
            __random random.c:295 (cycles:1)
            __random random.c:295 (RET CROSS_2M)
            |
             --2.23%--__random_r random_r.c:392 (cycles:9)

In this example, The "main div.c:39 (COND_BWD CROSS_2M predicted:49.7%)"
is "to" of branch and "main div.c:44 (cycles:1)" is "from" of branch.
It should be easier for understanding than before.

Signed-off-by: Yao Jin <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1500894547-18411-1-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-07-25 22:46:35 -03:00
Jin Yao
992c7e9267 perf util: Create branch.c/.h for common branch functions
Create new util/branch.c and util/branch.h to contain the common branch
functions. Such as:

branch_type_count(): Count the numbers of branch types
branch_type_name() : Return the name of branch type
branch_type_stat_display(): Display branch type statistics info
branch_type_str(): Construct the branch type string.

The branch type is saved in branch_flags.

Change log:

v8: Change PERF_BR_NONE to PERF_BR_UNKNOWN.

v7: Since the common branch type name is changed (e.g. JCC->COND),
    this patch is performed the modification accordingly.

v6: Move that multiline conditional code inside {} brackets.
    Move branch_type_stat_display() from builtin-report.c to
      branch.c.
    Move branch_type_str() from callchain.c to branch.c.

v5: It's a new patch in v5 patch series.

Signed-off-by: Yao Jin <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1500379995-6449-6-git-send-email-yao.jin@linux.intel.com
[ Don't use 'index' and 'stat' as names for variables, it shadows global decls in older distros ]
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
2017-07-18 23:14:40 -03:00