For some platforms, it is inappropriate to register all PXA UARTs.
In some cases, the UARTs may not be used, and in others we may want
to avoid registering the UARTs to allow other drivers (eg, FICP) to
make use of the UART.
In addition, a while back there was a request to be able to pass
platform data to the UART driver.
This patch enables all of this by providing functions platforms can
call to register each individual UART.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il>
Acked-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@gmail.com>
Considering the header mess ATM, it is not always possible to include
the correct header files within board code. Let's keep this simple:
<mach/pxa25x.h> - for pxa25x based platforms
<mach/pxa27x.h> - for pxa27x based platforms
<mach/pxa300.h> - for pxa300 based platforms
<mach/pxa320.h> - for pxa320 based platforms
<mach/pxa930.h> - for pxa930 based platforms
NOTE:
1. one header one board file, they are not compatible (i.e. they have
conflicting definitions which won't compile if included together).
2. Unless strictly necessary, the following header files are considered
to be SoC files use _only_, and is not recommended to be included in
board code:
<mach/hardware.h>
<mach/pxa-regs.h>
<mach/pxa2xx-regs.h>
<mach/pxa3xx-regs.h>
<mach/mfp.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa2xx.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa25x.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa27x.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa3xx.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa300.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa320.h>
<mach/mfp-pxa930.h>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.miao@marvell.com>
Remove includes of asm/hardware.h in addition to asm/arch/hardware.h.
Then, since asm/hardware.h only exists to include asm/arch/hardware.h,
update everything to directly include asm/arch/hardware.h and remove
asm/hardware.h.
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
