Make acpi_sleep_prepare() static and cause it to print a message
specifying the ACPI system sleep state to be entered (helpful for
debugging the suspend/hibernation code).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current
hibernation code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which may cause some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during hibernation (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).
Make the hibernation code execute _PTS before putting devices into
low power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) with the
possibility to override that using the 'acpi_new_pts_ordering' kernel
command line option.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Introduce global hibernation callback .end() and rename global
hibernation callback .start() to .begin(), in analogy with the
recent modifications of the global suspend callbacks.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order. The current
suspend code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which causes some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during suspend (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).
Make the suspend code execute _PTS before putting devices into low
power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) and provide a command
line option to override the default if need be.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The preparation to enter an ACPI system sleep state is now tied to
the disabling of GPEs, but the GPEs should not be disabled before
suspending devices. Since on ACPI 1.0x systems the _PTS global
control method should be executed before suspending devices, we
need to disable GPEs separately.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
The execution of ACPI global control methods _GTS and _BFS is
currently tied to the preparation to enter a sleep state and to the
leaving of the sleep state, respectively. However, these functions
are called before disabling the nonboot CPUs and after enabling
them, respectively (in fact, on ACPI 1.0x systems the first of them
ought to be called before suspending devices), while according to the
ACPI specification, _GTS is to be executed right prior to entering
the system sleep state and _BFS is to be executed right after the
platfor firmware has returned control to the OS on wake up.
Move the execution of _GTS and _BFS to the right places.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
On ACPI systems the target state set by acpi_pm_set_target() is
reset by acpi_pm_finish(), but that need not be called if the
suspend fails. All platforms that use the .set_target() global
suspend callback are affected by analogous issues.
For this reason, we need an additional global suspend callback that
will reset the target state regardless of whether or not the suspend
is successful. Also, it is reasonable to rename the .set_target()
callback, since it will be used for a different purpose on ACPI
systems (due to ACPI 1.0x code ordering requirements).
Introduce the global suspend callback .end() to be executed at the
end of the suspend sequence and rename the .set_target() global
suspend callback to .begin().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Wakeup GPE hasn't a handler. If system is waked up by such GPE like a
USB hotplug, I saw a lot of error reporting the GPE hasn't handler.
acpi_leave_sleep_state will clear the GPE but it's too late, we should
do it before interrupt is re-enabled.
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Some code in acpi_hibernation_finish() was moved to acpi_hibernation_leave(),
but the old copy had been left (it's harmless, but also useless). Remove it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() to return the value returned
by _SxD if the device is supposed to wake up the system from
given sleep state and the evaluation of _SxW fails (e.g. _SxW
is not present).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
/proc/acpi/alarm can't be set correctly, here is a sample:
[root@localhost /]# echo "2006 09" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-09 09:09:09
[root@localhost /]# echo "2006 04" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-04 04:04:04
[root@localhost /]#
Obviously, it is wrong, it should consider it as an invalid input.
after this patch:
[root@localhost /]# echo "2008 09" > /proc/acpi/alarm
-bash: echo: write error: Invalid argument
[root@localhost /]#
Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
In function acpi_system_write_alarm in file drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c,
big sec, min, hr, mo, day and yr are counted twice to get reasonable
values, that is very superfluous, we can do that only once.
In additon, /proc/acpi/alarm can set a related value which can be
specified as YYYY years MM months DD days HH hours MM minutes SS
senconds, it isn't a date, so you can specify as +0000-00-00 96:00:00
, that means 3 days later, current code can't handle such a case.
This patch removes unnecessary code and does with the aforementioned
situation.
Before applying this patch:
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-00 00:00:00
[root@localhost /]# echo "0000-00-00 96:180:180" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost /]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
0007-12-02 **:**:**
[root@localhost /]#
After applying this patch:
[root@localhost ~]# echo "2007-12-00 00:00:00" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
2007-12-00 00:00:00
[root@localhost ~]# echo "0000-00-00 96:180:180" > /proc/acpi/alarm
[root@localhost ~]# cat /proc/acpi/alarm
0007-12-04 03:03:00
[root@localhost ~]#
Signed-off-by: Yi Yang <yi.y.yang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This fixes some totally illogical and wrong code that converts things to
and from BCD mode essentially randomly, does math on values in BCD mode
etc etc. Introduce a few helper functions to make it a bit more obvious
what is going on, and make sure that we always do all the arithmetic
(and anythign else, for that matter) in binary, not BCD.
Tested by Mark Lord, who found the problem originally, and also pushed
the patch back and reminded me about it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <mlord@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
acpi_leave_sleep_state() should have correct list of wake and
runtime GPEs, which is available only after disable_wakeup_device()
is called.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Commit 9b03933080 removed
acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare(), the only function used at S5 transition
Add call to generic acpi_enable_wake_device().
Reference: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299882
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
* 'release' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6: (41 commits)
ACPICA: hw: Don't carry spinlock over suspend
ACPICA: hw: remove use_lock flag from acpi_hw_register_{read, write}
ACPI: cpuidle: port idle timer suspend/resume workaround to cpuidle
ACPI: clean up acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep
Hibernation: Make sure that ACPI is enabled in acpi_hibernation_finish
ACPI: suppress uninitialized var warning
cpuidle: consolidate 2.6.22 cpuidle branch into one patch
ACPI: thinkpad-acpi: skip blanks before the data when parsing sysfs
ACPI: AC: Add sysfs interface
ACPI: SBS: Add sysfs alarm
ACPI: SBS: Add ACPI_PROCFS around procfs handling code.
ACPI: SBS: Add support for power_supply class (and sysfs)
ACPI: SBS: Make SBS reads table-driven.
ACPI: SBS: Simplify data structures in SBS
ACPI: SBS: Split host controller (ACPI0001) from SBS driver (ACPI0002)
ACPI: EC: Add new query handler to list head.
ACPI: Add acpi_bus_generate_event4() function
ACPI: Battery: add sysfs alarm
ACPI: Battery: Add sysfs support
ACPI: Battery: Misc clean-ups, no functional changes
...
Fix up conflicts in drivers/misc/thinkpad_acpi.[ch] manually
The following scenario leads to total confusion of the platform firmware on
some boxes (eg. HPC nx6325):
* Hibernate with ACPI enabled
* Resume passing "acpi=off" to the boot kernel
To prevent this from happening it's necessary to check if ACPI is enabled (and
enable it if that's not the case) _right_ _after_ control has been transfered
from the boot kernel to the image kernel, before device_power_up() is called
(ie. with interrupts disabled). Enabling ACPI after calling
device_power_up() turns out to be insufficient.
For this reason, introduce new hibernation callback ->leave() that will be
executed before device_power_up() by the restored image kernel. To make it
work, it also is necessary to move swsusp_suspend() from swsusp.c to disk.c
(it's name is changed to "create_image", which is more up to the point).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Rename 'struct hibernation_ops' to 'struct platform_hibernation_ops' in
analogy with 'struct platform_suspend_ops'.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
During hibernation we also need to tell the ACPI core that we're going to put
the system into the S4 sleep state. For this reason, an additional method in
'struct hibernation_ops' is needed, playing the role of set_target() in
'struct platform_suspend_operations'. Moreover, the role of the .prepare()
method is now different, so it's better to introduce another method, that in
general may be different from .prepare(), that will be used to prepare the
platform for creating the hibernation image (.prepare() is used anyway to
notify the platform that we're going to enter the low power state after the
image has been saved).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
There is no reason why the .prepare() and .finish() methods in 'struct
platform_suspend_ops' should take any arguments, since architectures don't use
these methods' argument in any practically meaningful way (ie. either the
target system sleep state is conveyed to the platform by .set_target(), or
there is only one suspend state supported and it is indicated to the PM core
by .valid(), or .prepare() and .finish() aren't defined at all). There also
is no reason why .finish() should return any result.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
The name of 'struct pm_ops' suggests that it is related to the power
management in general, but in fact it is only related to suspend. Moreover,
its name should indicate what this structure is used for, so it seems
reasonable to change it to 'struct platform_suspend_ops'. In that case, the
name of the global variable of this type used by the PM core and the names of
related functions should be changed accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If the BIOS does not enable ACPI and the "acpi=off" command line parameter
is passed to the boot kernel, ACPI may be disabled when the (restored)
image kernel attempts to execute acpi_hibernation_finish(). To prevent
this from happening we can call acpi_enable() from
acpi_hibernation_finish() (if ACPI is already enabled, this will have no
effect).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Three main sets of changes:
1) dmi_get_system_info() return value should have been marked const,
since callers should not be changing that data.
2) const-ify DMI internals, since DMI firmware tables should,
whenever possible, be marked const to ensure we never ever write to
that data area.
3) const-ify DMI API, to enable marking tables const where possible
in low-level drivers.
And if we're really lucky, this might enable some additional
optimizations on the part of the compiler.
The bulk of the changes are #2 and #3, which are interrelated. #1 could
have been a separate patch, but it was so small compared to the others,
it was easier to roll it into this changeset.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
S4 suspend to disk will disable GPE's permanently
because acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() does not have
a counterpart at resume time. Thus, those devices
became unavailable for wakeup from subsequent
S3 suspend-to-ram.
Here acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare() is removed, and upon suspend
acpi_enable_wakeup_device() gets its functionality.
Upon resume, acpi_disable_wakeup_device() restores the state.
https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=292300
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This fixes compilation with CONFIG_SUSPEND unset and CONFIG_HIBERNATION set
(raf. http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=119055289723895&w=4).
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Make the S0 state be always reported as supported
Signed-off: Frans Pop <elendil@planet.nl>
Acked-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Recent changes to sleep initialization in ACPI dropped reporting of supported Sx
states above S3. Fix that and also move S5 init into same file as other Sx.
The only functional change is adding printk() for S4 and S5 cases.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Commit 2bcf9dddeb8e79a4ba55bf191533f70f39ce
('ACPI: delete CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS_SLEEP (again)')
was incomplete.
Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Restore the 2.6.22 CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP build option, but now shadowing the
new CONFIG_PM_SLEEP option.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
[ Modified to work with the PM config setup changes. ]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Introduce CONFIG_SUSPEND representing the ability to enter system sleep
states, such as the ACPI S3 state, and allow the user to choose SUSPEND
and HIBERNATION independently of each other.
Make HOTPLUG_CPU be selected automatically if SUSPEND or HIBERNATION has
been chosen and the kernel is intended for SMP systems.
Also, introduce CONFIG_PM_SLEEP which is automatically selected if
CONFIG_SUSPEND or CONFIG_HIBERNATION is set and use it to select the
code needed for both suspend and hibernation.
The top-level power management headers and the ACPI code related to
suspend and hibernation are modified to use the new definitions (the
changes in drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c are, mostly, moving code to reduce
the number of ifdefs).
There are many other files in which CONFIG_PM can be replaced with
CONFIG_PM_SLEEP or even with CONFIG_SUSPEND, but they can be updated in
the future.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Replace CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND with CONFIG_HIBERNATION to avoid
confusion (among other things, with CONFIG_SUSPEND introduced in the
next patch).
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
As it was a synonym for (CONFIG_ACPI && CONFIG_X86),
the ifdefs for it were more clutter than they were worth.
For ia64, just add a few stubs in anticipation of future
S3 or S4 support.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Remove references to ACPI_STATE_S2, introduced by
acpi-implement-the-set_target-callback-from-pm_ops.patch, from acpi_pm_enter().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
/proc/acpi/sleep has had its own "default n" option,
ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP, for many months.
Time to delete ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_SLEEP.
Users that still need /proc/acpi/sleep can still get it
along with the other deprecated /proc/acpi files
by enabling CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS.
Also delete ACPI_SLEEP_PROC_FS, which was an umbrella
for /proc/acpi/sleep, wakeup, alarm, because it was
effectively just a synonym for ACPI_SLEEP.
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Based on the David Brownell's patch at
http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=117873972806360&w=2
updated by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Add a helper routine returning the lowest power (highest number) ACPI device
power state that given device can be in while the system is in the sleep state
indicated by acpi_target_sleep_state .
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
In the future some drivers may need to use ACPI to determine the low power
states in which to place their devices, but to provide the drivers with this
information the ACPI core needs to know what sleep state the system is going to
enter. Namely, the device's state should not be too high power for given system
sleep state and, if the device is supposed to be able to wake up the system, its
state should not be too low power for the wake up to be possible). For this
purpose, the ACPI core needs to implement the set_target() method in 'struct
pm_ops' and store the target system sleep state passed by the PM core in a
variable.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Acked-by: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Introduce the pm_power_off_prepare() callback that can be registered by the
interested platforms in analogy with pm_idle() and pm_power_off(), used for
preparing the system to power off (needed by ACPI).
This allows us to drop acpi_sysclass and device_acpi that are only defined in
order to register the ACPI power off preparation callback, which is needed by
pm_power_off() registered in a much different way.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Since we are now explicitly calling hibernation_ops->prepare() before
hibernation_ops->enter() in hibernation_platform_enter() (defined in
kernel/power/disk.c), ACPI should not call acpi_sleep_prepare(ACPI_STATE_S4)
from acpi_shutdown().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
At least on some machines it is necessary to prepare the ACPI firmware for the
restoration of the system memory state from the hibernation image if the
"platform" mode of hibernation has been used. Namely, in that cases we need
to disable the GPEs before replacing the "boot" kernel with the "frozen"
kernel (cf. http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7887). After the
restore they will be re-enabled by hibernation_ops->finish(), but if the
restore fails, they have to be re-enabled by the restore code explicitly.
For this purpose we can introduce two additional hibernation operations,
called pre_restore() and restore_cleanup() and call them from the restore code
path. Still, they should be called if the "platform" mode of hibernation has
been used, so we need to pass the information about the hibernation mode from
the "frozen" kernel to the "boot" kernel in the image header.
Apparently, we can't drop the disabling of GPEs before the restore because of
Bug #7887 . We also can't do it unconditionally, because the GPEs wouldn't
have been enabled after a successful restore if the suspend had been done in
the 'shutdown' or 'reboot' mode.
In principle we could (and probably should) unconditionally disable the GPEs
before each snapshot creation *and* before the restore, but then we'd have to
unconditionally enable them after the snapshot creation as well as after the
restore (or restore failure) Still, for this purpose we'd need to modify
acpi_enter_sleep_state_prep() and acpi_leave_sleep_state() and we'd have to
introduce some mechanism synchronizing the disablind/enabling of the GPEs with
the device drivers' .suspend()/.resume() routines and with
disable_/enable_nonboot_cpus(). However, this would have affected the
suspend (ie. s2ram) code as well as the hibernation, which I'd like to avoid
in this patch series.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Nigel Cunningham <nigel@nigel.suspend2.net>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
If we have quirk "init... after standby", we should not be calling it while
resuming from hibernation. And... that quirk is only ever needed on toshiba
4030cdt... and... noone should be using standby these days, anyway.
That quirk was certainly _not_ meant to be ran after hibernation.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
