2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-23 12:43:55 +08:00
Commit Graph

12 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Rafael J. Wysocki
1271d6d576 Merge branch 'pm-opp'
* pm-opp:
  cpufreq: OMAP: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: imx6q: Register an Energy Model
  opp: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
  cpufreq: mediatek: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: scmi: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: arm_big_little: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: scpi: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model
2019-03-04 11:19:14 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
17162a117c Merge back earlier cpufreq material for v5.1. 2019-02-24 21:18:05 +01:00
Yangtao Li
8cbd468bde cpufreq: scmi: Fix use-after-free in scmi_cpufreq_exit()
This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle. So
change the order of function calls to fix it.

Fixes: 1690d8bb91 (cpufreq: scpi/scmi: Fix freeing of dynamic OPPs)

Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: 4.20+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.20+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-02-19 11:17:37 +01:00
Rafael J. Wysocki
78317ed93a Merge branch 'opp/linux-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm into pm-opp
Pull operating performance points (OPP) framework updates for v5.1
from Viresh Kumar:

"This pull request contains following changes:

 - Introduced new OPP helper for power-estimation and used it in
   several cpufreq drivers (Quentin Perret, Matthias Kaehlcke, Dietmar
   Eggemann, and Yangtao Li).

 - OPP Debugfs cleanup (Greg KH).

 - OPP core cleanup (Viresh Kumar)."

* 'opp/linux-next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm:
  cpufreq: OMAP: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: imx6q: Register an Energy Model
  opp: no need to check return value of debugfs_create functions
  cpufreq: mediatek: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: scmi: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: arm_big_little: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: scpi: Register an Energy Model
  cpufreq: dt: Register an Energy Model
  PM / OPP: Introduce a power estimation helper
  PM / OPP: Remove unused parameter of _generic_set_opp_clk_only()
2019-02-12 12:14:33 +01:00
Quentin Perret
3c429851f9 cpufreq: scmi: Register an Energy Model
The Energy Model (EM) framework provides an API to register the active
power of CPUs. Call this API from the scmi-cpufreq driver by using the
power costs obtained from firmware. This is done to ensure interested
subsystems (the task scheduler, for example) can make use of the EM
when available.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
2019-02-07 09:55:12 +05:30
Amit Kucheria
5da7af9a94 cpufreq: scmi: Use auto-registration of thermal cooling device
Use the CPUFREQ_IS_COOLING_DEV flag to allow cpufreq core to
automatically register as a thermal cooling device.

This allows removal of boiler plate code from the driver.

Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-01-30 23:06:08 +01:00
Quentin Perret
0e141d1c65 cpufreq: scmi: Fix frequency invariance in slow path
The scmi-cpufreq driver calls the arch_set_freq_scale() callback on
frequency changes to provide scale-invariant load-tracking signals to
the scheduler. However, in the slow path, it does so while specifying
the current and max frequencies in different units, hence resulting in a
broken freq_scale factor.

Fix this by passing all frequencies in KHz, as stored in the CPUFreq
frequency table.

Fixes: 99d6bdf338 (cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol)
Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <quentin.perret@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: 4.17+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.17+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-01-09 12:10:25 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
1690d8bb91 cpufreq: scpi/scmi: Fix freeing of dynamic OPPs
Since the commit 2a4eb7358a "OPP: Don't remove dynamic OPPs from
_dev_pm_opp_remove_table()", dynamically created OPP aren't
automatically removed anymore by dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table(). This
affects the scpi and scmi cpufreq drivers which no longer free OPPs on
failures or on invocations of the policy->exit() callback.

Create a generic OPP helper dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic() which can be
called from these drivers instead of dev_pm_opp_cpumask_remove_table().

In dev_pm_opp_remove_all_dynamic(), we need to make sure that the
opp_list isn't getting accessed simultaneously from other parts of the
OPP core while the helper is freeing dynamic OPPs, i.e. we can't drop
the opp_table->lock while traversing through the OPP list. And to
accomplish that, this patch also creates _opp_kref_release_unlocked()
which can be called from this new helper with the opp_table lock already
held.

Cc: 4.20 <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.20
Reported-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Fixes: 2a4eb7358a "OPP: Don't remove dynamic OPPs from _dev_pm_opp_remove_table()"
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2019-01-04 12:19:40 +01:00
Sudeep Holla
7859e08c1b firmware: arm_scmi: rename get_transition_latency and add_opps_to_device
Most of the scmi code follows the suggestion from Greg KH on a totally
different thread[0] to have the subsystem name first, followed by the
noun and finally the verb with couple of these exceptions.

This patch fixes them so that all the functions names are aligned to
that practice.

[0] https://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg583673.html

Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2018-05-10 10:49:40 +01:00
Viresh Kumar
d983af9864 cpufreq: SCMI: Don't validate the frequency table twice
The cpufreq core is already validating the CPU frequency table after
calling the ->init() callback of the cpufreq drivers and the drivers
don't need to do the same anymore. Though they need to set the
policy->freq_table field directly from the ->init() callback now.

Stop validating the frequency table from SCMI driver.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
2018-04-10 08:39:55 +02:00
Sudeep Holla
02f208c5c6 cpufreq: scmi: add support for fast frequency switching
The cpufreq core provides option for drivers to implement fast_switch
callback which is invoked for frequency switching from interrupt context.

This patch adds support for fast_switch callback in SCMI cpufreq driver
by making use of polling based SCMI transfer. It also sets the flag
fast_switch_possible.

Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2018-02-28 16:37:57 +00:00
Sudeep Holla
99d6bdf338 cpufreq: add support for CPU DVFS based on SCMI message protocol
On some ARM based systems, a separate Cortex-M based System Control
Processor(SCP) provides the overall power, clock, reset and system
control including CPU DVFS. SCMI Message Protocol is used to
communicate with the SCP.

This patch adds a cpufreq driver for such systems using SCMI interface
to drive CPU DVFS.

Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
2018-02-28 16:37:57 +00:00