It always returns 0 (success) and its return type should really be void.
Over that, many drivers have added error handling code based on its
return value, which is not required at all.
Change its return type to void and update all the callers.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This implements QoS requests to manage userspace configuration of min
and max frequency.
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: syzbot <syzbot+de771ae9390dffed7266@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The implementation of intel_pstate_update_max_freq() is quite similar to
refresh_frequency_limits(), lets reuse it.
Finding minimum of policy->user_policy.max and policy->cpuinfo.max_freq
in intel_pstate_update_max_freq() is redundant as cpufreq_set_policy()
will call the ->verify() callback of intel-pstate driver, which will do
this comparison anyway and so dropping it from
intel_pstate_update_max_freq() doesn't harm.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Register notifiers for min/max frequency constraints with the PM QoS
framework. The constraints are also taken into consideration in
cpufreq_set_policy().
This also relocates cpufreq_policy_put_kobj() as it is required to be
called from cpufreq_policy_alloc() now.
refresh_frequency_limits() is updated to avoid calling
cpufreq_set_policy() for inactive policies and handle_update() is
updated to have proper locking in place.
No constraints are added until now though.
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
On some occasions cpufreq_verify_current_freq() schedules a work whose
callback is handle_update(), which further calls cpufreq_update_policy()
which may end up calling cpufreq_verify_current_freq() again.
On the other hand, when cpufreq_update_policy() is called from
handle_update(), the pointer to the cpufreq policy is already
available, but cpufreq_cpu_acquire() is still called to get it in
cpufreq_update_policy(), which should be avoided as well.
To fix these issues, create a new helper, refresh_frequency_limits(),
and make both handle_update() call it cpufreq_update_policy().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Rename reeval_frequency_limits() as refresh_frequency_limits() ]
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Their implementations are quite similar, so modify
cpufreq_update_current_freq() somewhat and call it from
__cpufreq_get().
Also rename cpufreq_update_current_freq() to
cpufreq_verify_current_freq(), as that's what it is doing.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS was introduced in a very old commit from pre-2.6
kernel release by commit 6a4a93f9c0d5 ("[CPUFREQ] Fix 'out of sync'
issue").
Basically, that commit does two things:
- It adds the frequency verification code (which is quite similar to
what we have today as well).
- And it sets the CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS flag only for setpolicy drivers,
rightly so based on the code we had then. The idea was to avoid
frequency validation for setpolicy drivers as the cpufreq core doesn't
know what frequency the hardware is running at and so no point in
doing frequency verification.
The problem happened when we started to use the same CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS
flag for constant loops-per-jiffy thing as well and many has_target()
drivers started using the same flag and unknowingly skipped the
verification of frequency. There is no logical reason behind skipping
frequency validation because of the presence of CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS
flag otherwise.
Fix this issue by skipping frequency validation only for setpolicy
drivers and always doing it for has_target() drivers irrespective of
the presence or absence of CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS flag.
cpufreq_notify_transition() is only called for has_target() type driver
and not for set_policy type, and the check is simply redundant. Remove
it as well.
Also remove () around freq comparison statement as they aren't required
and checkpatch also warns for them.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
For code consistency, use has_target() instead of !setpolicy everywhere,
as it is already done at several places. Maybe we should also use
"!has_target()" instead of "cpufreq_driver->setpolicy" where we need to
check if the driver supports setpolicy, so to use only one expression
for this kind of differentiation.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpufreq_start_governor() is only called for !setpolicy case, checking it
again is not required.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpufreq_online() and cpufreq_offline() [un]register the driver as
a cooling device. This is done if the driver is flagged as a cooling
device in addition with an IS_ENABLED() check to compile out the branching
code.
Group this test in a stub function added in the cpufreq header instead
of having the IS_ENABLED() in the code.
Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
- Fix recent regression causing kernels built with CONFIG_PM
unset to crash on systems that support the Performance and
Energy Bias Hint (EPB) by avoiding to compile the EPB-related
code depending on CONFIG_PM when it is unset (Rafael Wysocki).
- Clean up the transition notifier invocation code in the cpufreq
core and change some users of cpufreq transition notifiers
accordingly (Viresh Kumar).
- Change MAINTAINERS to cover the schedutil governor as part of
cpufreq (Viresh Kumar).
- Simplify cpufreq_init_policy() to avoid redundant computations
(Yue Hu).
- Add explanatory comment to the cpufreq core (Rafael Wysocki).
- Introduce a new flag, GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON, to the generic
power domains (genpd) framework along with the first user of it
(Leonard Crestez).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=LqTN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'pm-5.2-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
Pull more power management updates from Rafael Wysocki:
"These fix a recent regression causing kernels built with CONFIG_PM
unset to crash on systems that support the Performance and Energy Bias
Hint (EPB), clean up the cpufreq core and some users of transition
notifiers and introduce a new power domain flag into the generic power
domains framework (genpd).
Specifics:
- Fix recent regression causing kernels built with CONFIG_PM unset to
crash on systems that support the Performance and Energy Bias Hint
(EPB) by avoiding to compile the EPB-related code depending on
CONFIG_PM when it is unset (Rafael Wysocki).
- Clean up the transition notifier invocation code in the cpufreq
core and change some users of cpufreq transition notifiers
accordingly (Viresh Kumar).
- Change MAINTAINERS to cover the schedutil governor as part of
cpufreq (Viresh Kumar).
- Simplify cpufreq_init_policy() to avoid redundant computations (Yue
Hu).
- Add explanatory comment to the cpufreq core (Rafael Wysocki).
- Introduce a new flag, GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON, to the generic
power domains (genpd) framework along with the first user of it
(Leonard Crestez)"
* tag 'pm-5.2-rc1-2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
soc: imx: gpc: Use GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON for ERR009619
PM / Domains: Add GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON flag
cpufreq: Update MAINTAINERS to include schedutil governor
cpufreq: Don't find governor for setpolicy drivers in cpufreq_init_policy()
cpufreq: Explain the kobject_put() in cpufreq_policy_alloc()
cpufreq: Call transition notifier only once for each policy
x86: intel_epb: Take CONFIG_PM into account
In cpufreq_init_policy() we will check if there's last_governor for target
and setpolicy type. However last_governor is set only if has_target() is
true in cpufreq_offline(). That means find last_governor for setpolicy
type is pointless. Also new_policy.governor will not be used if ->setpolicy
callback is set in cpufreq_set_policy().
Moreover, there's duplicate ->setpolicy check in using default policy path.
Let's add a new helper function to avoid it. Also update comments.
Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
It may not be particularly clear why the kobject_put() after
failing kobject_init_and_add() in cpufreq_policy_alloc() is not
redundant, so add a comment to explain that.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Currently, the notifiers are called once for each CPU of the policy->cpus
cpumask. It would be more optimal if the notifier can be called only
once and all the relevant information be provided to it. Out of the 23
drivers that register for the transition notifiers today, only 4 of them
do per-cpu updates and the callback for the rest can be called only once
for the policy without any impact.
This would also avoid multiple function calls to the notifier callbacks
and reduce multiple iterations of notifier core's code (which does
locking as well).
This patch adds pointer to the cpufreq policy to the struct
cpufreq_freqs, so the notifier callback has all the information
available to it with a single call. The five drivers which perform
per-cpu updates are updated to use the cpufreq policy. The freqs->cpu
field is redundant now and is removed.
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> (sparc)
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=WZfC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'printk-for-5.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pmladek/printk
Pull printk updates from Petr Mladek:
- Allow state reset of printk_once() calls.
- Prevent crashes when dereferencing invalid pointers in vsprintf().
Only the first byte is checked for simplicity.
- Make vsprintf warnings consistent and inlined.
- Treewide conversion of obsolete %pf, %pF to %ps, %pF printf
modifiers.
- Some clean up of vsprintf and test_printf code.
* tag 'printk-for-5.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pmladek/printk:
lib/vsprintf: Make function pointer_string static
vsprintf: Limit the length of inlined error messages
vsprintf: Avoid confusion between invalid address and value
vsprintf: Prevent crash when dereferencing invalid pointers
vsprintf: Consolidate handling of unknown pointer specifiers
vsprintf: Factor out %pO handler as kobject_string()
vsprintf: Factor out %pV handler as va_format()
vsprintf: Factor out %p[iI] handler as ip_addr_string()
vsprintf: Do not check address of well-known strings
vsprintf: Consistent %pK handling for kptr_restrict == 0
vsprintf: Shuffle restricted_pointer()
printk: Tie printk_once / printk_deferred_once into .data.once for reset
treewide: Switch printk users from %pf and %pF to %ps and %pS, respectively
lib/test_printf: Switch to bitmap_zalloc()
Currently the error return path from kobject_init_and_add() is not
followed by a call to kobject_put() - which means we are leaking the
kobject.
Fix it by adding a call to kobject_put() in the error path of
kobject_init_and_add().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobin C. Harding <tobin@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currenly, __cpufreq_get() called by show_cpuinfo_cur_freq() will check
->get callback. That is needless since cpuinfo_cur_freq attribute will
not be created if ->get is not set. So let's drop it in __cpufreq_get().
Also keep this check in cpufreq_get().
Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Initially, bios_limit attribute will be created if driver->bios_limit
is set in cpufreq_add_dev_interface(). So remove the redundant check
for latter show operation.
Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently there are three calling paths for cpufreq_boost_supported() in
all as below, we can see the cpufreq_driver null check is needless since
it is already checked before.
<path1>
cpufreq_enable_boost_support()
|-> if (!cpufreq_driver)
|-> cpufreq_boost_supported()
<path2>
cpufreq_register_driver()
|-> if (!driver_data ...
|-> cpufreq_driver = driver_data
|-> cpufreq_boost_supported()
|-> remove_boost_sysfs_file()
|-> cpufreq_boost_supported()
<path3>
cpufreq_unregister_driver()
|-> if (!cpufreq_driver ...
|-> remove_boost_sysfs_file()
|-> cpufreq_boost_supported()
Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@yulong.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
While the cpuinfo.max_freq value doesn't really matter for
intel_pstate in the active mode, in the passive mode it is used by
governors as the maximum physical frequency of the CPU and the
results of governor computations generally depend on it. Also it
is made available to user space via sysfs and it should match the
current HW configuration.
For this reason, make intel_pstate update cpuinfo.max_freq for all
CPUs if it detects a global change of turbo frequency settings from
"disable" to "enable" or the other way associated with a _PPC change
notification from the platform firmware.
Note that policy_is_inactive(), cpufreq_cpu_acquire(),
cpufreq_cpu_release(), and cpufreq_set_policy() need to be made
available to it for this purpose.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200759
Reported-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
It sometimes is necessary to find a cpufreq policy for a given CPU
and acquire its rwsem (for writing) immediately after that, so
introduce cpufreq_cpu_acquire() as a helper for that and the
complementary cpufreq_cpu_release().
Make cpufreq_update_policy() use the new functions.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In some cases, the platform firmware disables or enables turbo
frequencies for all CPUs globally before triggering a _PPC change
notification for one of them. Obviously, that global change affects
all CPUs, not just the notified one, and it needs to be acted upon by
cpufreq.
The intel_pstate driver is able to detect such global changes of
the settings, but it also needs to update policy limits for all
CPUs if that happens, in particular if turbo frequencies are
enabled globally - to allow them to be used.
For this reason, introduce a new cpufreq driver callback to be
invoked on _PPC notifications, if present, instead of simply
calling cpufreq_update_policy() for the notified CPU and make
intel_pstate use it to trigger policy updates for all CPUs
in the system if global settings change.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=200759
Reported-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Gabriele Mazzotta <gabriele.mzt@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Fix the formatting of the cpufreq_cpu_get() and cpufreq_cpu_put()
kerneldoc comments and rework them to be somewhat easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The invocation of the ->setpolicy() cpufreq driver callback should
be equivalent to calling cpufreq_governor_limits(policy) for drivers
with internal governors, but in fact it isn't so, because the
temporary new_policy object is passed to it instead of the updated
policy.
That is a bit confusing, so make cpufreq_set_policy() pass the
updated policy to the driver ->setpolicy() callback.
No intentional changes of behavior.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Remove the redundant "cpufreq:" prefix from two debug messages in
cpufreq_set_policy().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
In cpufreq_update_policy(), instead of updating new_policy.cur
separately, which is kind of confusing, because cpufreq_set_policy()
doesn't take that value into account directly anyway, make the copy
of the existing policy after calling cpufreq_update_current_freq().
No intentional changes of behavior.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Add kerneldoc comments describing cpufreq_set_policy() and
cpufreq_update_policy() as they have not been properly documented
so far and they really need to be documented.
While at it, fix white space around the cpufreq_set_policy() header.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Double NOT (!!) operation is normally done to convert a non-zero value
to 1 and keep zero as is, but that isn't the requirement in this case.
All we wanted was to make sure that only one of the two routines isn't
set, i.e. either both function pointers are set or both are unset.
This can be done with a single NOT (!) operation as well.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq core doesn't remove the cpufreq policy anymore on CPU
offline operation, rather that happens when the CPU device gets
unregistered from the kernel. This allows faster recovery when the CPU
comes back online. This is also very useful during system wide
suspend/resume where we offline all non-boot CPUs during suspend and
then bring them back on resume.
This commit takes the same idea a step ahead to allow drivers to do
light weight tear-down and bring-up during CPU offline and online
operations.
A new set of callbacks is introduced, online/offline(). online() gets
called when the first CPU of an inactive policy is brought up and
offline() gets called when all the CPUs of a policy are offlined.
The existing init/exit() callback get called on policy
creation/destruction. They also get called instead of online/offline()
callbacks if the online/offline() callbacks aren't provided.
This also moves around some code to get executed only for the new-policy
case going forward.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
All cpufreq drivers do similar things to register as a cooling device.
Provide a cpufreq driver flag so drivers can just ask the cpufreq core
to register the cooling device on their behalf. This allows us to get
rid of duplicated code in the drivers.
In order to allow this, we add a struct thermal_cooling_device pointer
to struct cpufreq_policy so that drivers don't need to store it in a
private data structure.
Suggested-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>
Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq_global_kobject is created using kobject_create_and_add()
helper, which assigns the kobj_type as dynamic_kobj_ktype and show/store
routines are set to kobj_attr_show() and kobj_attr_store().
These routines pass struct kobj_attribute as an argument to the
show/store callbacks. But all the cpufreq files created using the
cpufreq_global_kobject expect the argument to be of type struct
attribute. Things work fine currently as no one accesses the "attr"
argument. We may not see issues even if the argument is used, as struct
kobj_attribute has struct attribute as its first element and so they
will both get same address.
But this is logically incorrect and we should rather use struct
kobj_attribute instead of struct global_attr in the cpufreq core and
drivers and the show/store callbacks should take struct kobj_attribute
as argument instead.
This bug is caught using CFI CLANG builds in android kernel which
catches mismatch in function prototypes for such callbacks.
Reported-by: Donghee Han <dh.han@samsung.com>
Reported-by: Sangkyu Kim <skwith.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The local variable "new_policy" hasn't been used in the error path of
cpufreq_online() since commit f9f41e3ef9 (cpufreq: Remove policy
create/remove notifiers). Don't update it in that error path.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpuinfo_cur_freq gets current CPU frequency as detected by hardware
while scaling_cur_freq last known CPU frequency. Some platforms may not
allow checking the CPU frequency of an offline CPU or the associated
resources may have been released via cpufreq_exit when the CPU gets
offlined, in which case the policy would have been invalidated already.
If we attempt to get current frequency from the hardware, it may result
in hang or crash.
For example on Juno, I see:
Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000000000188
[0000000000000188] pgd=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Modules linked in:
CPU: 5 PID: 4202 Comm: cat Not tainted 4.20.0-08251-ga0f2c0318a15-dirty #87
Hardware name: ARM LTD ARM Juno Development Platform/ARM Juno Development Platform
pstate: 40000005 (nZcv daif -PAN -UAO)
pc : scmi_cpufreq_get_rate+0x34/0xb0
lr : scmi_cpufreq_get_rate+0x34/0xb0
Call trace:
scmi_cpufreq_get_rate+0x34/0xb0
__cpufreq_get+0x34/0xc0
show_cpuinfo_cur_freq+0x24/0x78
show+0x40/0x60
sysfs_kf_seq_show+0xc0/0x148
kernfs_seq_show+0x44/0x50
seq_read+0xd4/0x480
kernfs_fop_read+0x15c/0x208
__vfs_read+0x60/0x188
vfs_read+0x94/0x150
ksys_read+0x6c/0xd8
__arm64_sys_read+0x24/0x30
el0_svc_common+0x78/0x100
el0_svc_handler+0x38/0x78
el0_svc+0x8/0xc
---[ end trace 3d1024e58f77f6b2 ]---
So fix the issue by checking if the policy is invalid early in
__cpufreq_get before attempting to get the current frequency.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
WARN_ON() already contains an unlikely(), so it's not necessary to wrap it
into another.
Signed-off-by: Igor Stoppa <igor.stoppa@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
With lockdep turned on, the following circular lock dependency problem
was reported:
[ 57.470040] ======================================================
[ 57.502900] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
[ 57.535208] 4.18.0-0.rc3.1.el8+7.x86_64+debug #1 Tainted: G
[ 57.577761] ------------------------------------------------------
[ 57.609714] tuned/1505 is trying to acquire lock:
[ 57.633808] 00000000559deec5 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: store+0x27/0x120
[ 57.672880]
[ 57.672880] but task is already holding lock:
[ 57.702184] 000000002136ca64 (kn->count#118){++++}, at: kernfs_fop_write+0x1d0/0x410
[ 57.742176]
[ 57.742176] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[ 57.742176]
[ 57.785220]
[ 57.785220] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
:
[ 58.932512] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 58.932512]
[ 58.973344] Chain exists of:
[ 58.973344] cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> subsys mutex#5 --> kn->count#118
[ 58.973344]
[ 59.030795] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[ 59.030795]
[ 59.061248] CPU0 CPU1
[ 59.085377] ---- ----
[ 59.108160] lock(kn->count#118);
[ 59.124935] lock(subsys mutex#5);
[ 59.156330] lock(kn->count#118);
[ 59.186088] lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem);
[ 59.208541]
[ 59.208541] *** DEADLOCK ***
In the cpufreq_register_driver() function, the lock sequence is:
cpus_read_lock --> kn->count
For the cpufreq sysfs store method, the lock sequence is:
kn->count --> cpus_read_lock
These sequences are actually safe as they are taking a share lock on
cpu_hotplug_lock. However, the current lockdep code doesn't check for
share locking when detecting circular lock dependency. Fixing that
could be a substantial effort.
Instead, we can work around this problem by using cpus_read_trylock()
in the store method which is much simpler. The chance of not getting
the read lock is very small. If that happens, the userspace application
that writes the sysfs file will get an error.
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
systrace used for tracing for Android systems has carried a patch for
many years in the Android tree that traces when the cpufreq limits
change. With the help of this information, systrace can know when the
policy limits change and can visually display the data. Lets add
upstream support for the same.
Signed-off-by: Ruchi Kandoi <kandoiruchi@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Use the static SRCU initializer for `cpufreq_transition_notifier_list'.
This avoids the init_cpufreq_transition_notifier_list() initcall. Its
only purpose is to initialize the SRCU notifier once during boot and set
another variable which is used as an indicator whether the init was
perfromed before cpufreq_register_notifier() was used.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If the policy limits are updated via cpufreq_update_policy() and
subsequently via sysfs, the limits stored in user_policy may be
set incorrectly.
For example, if both min and max are set via sysfs to the maximum
available frequency, user_policy.min and user_policy.max will also
be the maximum. If a policy notifier triggered by
cpufreq_update_policy() lowers both the min and the max at this
point, that change is not reflected by the user_policy limits, so
if the max is updated again via sysfs to the same lower value,
then user_policy.max will be lower than user_policy.min which
shouldn't happen. In particular, if one of the policy CPUs is
then taken offline and back online, cpufreq_set_policy() will
fail for it due to a failing limits check.
To prevent that from happening, initialize the min and max fields
of the new_policy object to the ones stored in user_policy that
were previously set via sysfs.
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wangtao <kevin.wangtao@hisilicon.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog ]
Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpufreq_notify_transition() calls __cpufreq_notify_transition() for each
CPU of a policy. There is a lot of code in __cpufreq_notify_transition()
though which isn't required to be executed for each CPU, like checking
about disabled cpufreq or irqs, adjusting jiffies, updating cpufreq
stats and some debug print messages.
This commit merges __cpufreq_notify_transition() into
cpufreq_notify_transition() and modifies cpufreq_notify_transition() to
execute minimum amount of code for each CPU.
Also fix the kerneldoc for cpufreq_notify_transition() while at it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The cpufreq table is already validated by the cpufreq core and none of
the users of cpufreq_generic_init() have any dependency on it to
validate the table as well.
Don't validate the cpufreq table anymore from cpufreq_generic_init().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
By design, cpufreq drivers are responsible for calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() from their ->init()
callbacks to validate the frequency table.
However, if a cpufreq driver is buggy and fails to do so properly, it
lead to unexpected behavior of the driver or the cpufreq core at a
later point in time. It would be better if the core could
validate the frequency table during driver initialization.
To that end, introduce cpufreq_table_validate_and_sort() and make
the cpufreq core call it right after invoking the ->init() callback
of the driver and destroy the cpufreq policy if the table is invalid.
For the time being the validation of the table happens twice, once
from the driver and then from the core. The individual drivers will
be updated separately to drop table validation if they don't need it
for other reasons.
The frequency table is marked "sorted" or "unsorted" by the new helper
now instead of in cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(), as it should only
be done after validating the table (which the drivers won't do going
forward).
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject/changelog ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Ideally the de-allocation of resources should happen in the exact
opposite order in which they were allocated. It helps maintain the code
in long term, even if nothing really breaks with incorrect ordering.
That wasn't followed in cpufreq_online() and it has some
inconsistencies. For example, the symlinks were created from within
the locked region while they are removed only after putting the locks.
Also ->exit() should have been called only after the symlinks are
removed and the lock is dropped, as that was the case when ->init()
was first called.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Subject ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
cpufreq_resume can be called even without preceding cpufreq_suspend.
This can happen in following scenario:
suspend_devices_and_enter
--> dpm_suspend_start
--> dpm_prepare
--> device_prepare : this function errors out
--> dpm_suspend: this is skipped due to dpm_prepare failure
this means cpufreq_suspend is skipped over
--> goto Recover_platform, due to previous error
--> goto Resume_devices
--> dpm_resume_end
--> dpm_resume
--> cpufreq_resume
In case schedutil is used as frequency governor, cpufreq_resume will
eventually call sugov_start, which does following:
memset(sg_cpu, 0, sizeof(*sg_cpu));
....
This effectively erases function pointer for frequency update, causing
crash later on. The function pointer would have been set correctly if
subsequent cpufreq_add_update_util_hook runs successfully, but that
function returns earlier because cpufreq_suspend was not called:
if (WARN_ON(per_cpu(cpufreq_update_util_data, cpu)))
return;
The fix is to check cpufreq_suspended first, if it's false, that means
cpufreq_suspend was not called in the first place, so do not resume
cpufreq.
Signed-off-by: Bo Yan <byan@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ rjw: Dropped printing a message ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
It is possible to remove a cpufreq governor module after
cpufreq_parse_governor() has returned success in
store_scaling_governor() and before cpufreq_set_policy()
acquires a reference to it, because the governor list is
not protected during that period and nothing prevents the
governor from being unregistered then.
Prevent that from happening by acquiring an extra reference
to the governor module temporarily in cpufreq_parse_governor(),
under cpufreq_governor_mutex, and dropping it in
store_scaling_governor(), when cpufreq_set_policy() returns.
Note that the second cpufreq_parse_governor() call site is fine,
because it only cares about the policy member of new_policy.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Drop a pointless return statement from cpufreq_unregister_governor().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Pass policy pointer to cpufreq_parse_governor() instead of passing
pointers to two members of it so as to make the code slightly more
straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Drop an unnecessary local variable from cpufreq_parse_governor()
and rearrange the code in there to make it easier to follow.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
