We use print_bpf_insn in user space (bpftool and soon perf),
so it'd be nice to keep it generic and strip it off the kernel
struct bpf_verifier_env argument.
This argument can be safely removed, because its users can
use the struct bpf_insn_cbs::private_data to pass it.
By changing the argument type we can no longer have clean
'verbose' alias to 'bpf_verifier_log_write' in verifier.c.
Instead we're adding the 'verbose' cb_print callback and
removing the alias.
This way we have new cb_print callback in place, and all
the 'verbose(env, ...) calls in verifier.c will cleanly
cast to 'verbose(void *, ...)' so no other change is
needed.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This implements a BPF ULP layer to allow policy enforcement and
monitoring at the socket layer. In order to support this a new
program type BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG is used to run the policy at
the sendmsg/sendpage hook. To attach the policy to sockets a
sockmap is used with a new program attach type BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT.
Similar to previous sockmap usages when a sock is added to a
sockmap, via a map update, if the map contains a BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT
program type attached then the BPF ULP layer is created on the
socket and the attached BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG program is run for
every msg in sendmsg case and page/offset in sendpage case.
BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG Semantics/API:
BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG supports only two return codes SK_PASS and
SK_DROP. Returning SK_DROP free's the copied data in the sendmsg
case and in the sendpage case leaves the data untouched. Both cases
return -EACESS to the user. Returning SK_PASS will allow the msg to
be sent.
In the sendmsg case data is copied into kernel space buffers before
running the BPF program. The kernel space buffers are stored in a
scatterlist object where each element is a kernel memory buffer.
Some effort is made to coalesce data from the sendmsg call here.
For example a sendmsg call with many one byte iov entries will
likely be pushed into a single entry. The BPF program is run with
data pointers (start/end) pointing to the first sg element.
In the sendpage case data is not copied. We opt not to copy the
data by default here, because the BPF infrastructure does not
know what bytes will be needed nor when they will be needed. So
copying all bytes may be wasteful. Because of this the initial
start/end data pointers are (0,0). Meaning no data can be read or
written. This avoids reading data that may be modified by the
user. A new helper is added later in this series if reading and
writing the data is needed. The helper call will do a copy by
default so that the page is exclusively owned by the BPF call.
The verdict from the BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG applies to the entire msg
in the sendmsg() case and the entire page/offset in the sendpage case.
This avoids ambiguity on how to handle mixed return codes in the
sendmsg case. Again a helper is added later in the series if
a verdict needs to apply to multiple system calls and/or only
a subpart of the currently being processed message.
The helper msg_redirect_map() can be used to select the socket to
send the data on. This is used similar to existing redirect use
cases. This allows policy to redirect msgs.
Pseudo code simple example:
The basic logic to attach a program to a socket is as follows,
// load the programs
bpf_prog_load(SOCKMAP_TCP_MSG_PROG, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SK_MSG,
&obj, &msg_prog);
// lookup the sockmap
bpf_map_msg = bpf_object__find_map_by_name(obj, "my_sock_map");
// get fd for sockmap
map_fd_msg = bpf_map__fd(bpf_map_msg);
// attach program to sockmap
bpf_prog_attach(msg_prog, map_fd_msg, BPF_SK_MSG_VERDICT, 0);
Adding sockets to the map is done in the normal way,
// Add a socket 'fd' to sockmap at location 'i'
bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd_msg, &i, fd, BPF_ANY);
After the above any socket attached to "my_sock_map", in this case
'fd', will run the BPF msg verdict program (msg_prog) on every
sendmsg and sendpage system call.
For a complete example see BPF selftests or sockmap samples.
Implementation notes:
It seemed the simplest, to me at least, to use a refcnt to ensure
psock is not lost across the sendmsg copy into the sg, the bpf program
running on the data in sg_data, and the final pass to the TCP stack.
Some performance testing may show a better method to do this and avoid
the refcnt cost, but for now use the simpler method.
Another item that will come after basic support is in place is
supporting MSG_MORE flag. At the moment we call sendpages even if
the MSG_MORE flag is set. An enhancement would be to collect the
pages into a larger scatterlist and pass down the stack. Notice that
bpf_tcp_sendmsg() could support this with some additional state saved
across sendmsg calls. I built the code to support this without having
to do refactoring work. Other features TBD include ZEROCOPY and the
TCP_RECV_QUEUE/TCP_NO_QUEUE support. This will follow initial series
shortly.
Future work could improve size limits on the scatterlist rings used
here. Currently, we use MAX_SKB_FRAGS simply because this was being
used already in the TLS case. Future work could extend the kernel sk
APIs to tune this depending on workload. This is a trade-off
between memory usage and throughput performance.
Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
All of the conflicts were cases of overlapping changes.
In net/core/devlink.c, we have to make care that the
resouce size_params have become a struct member rather
than a pointer to such an object.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The requirements around atomic_add() / atomic64_add() resp. their
JIT implementations differ across architectures. E.g. while x86_64
seems just fine with BPF's xadd on unaligned memory, on arm64 it
triggers via interpreter but also JIT the following crash:
[ 830.864985] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffff8097d7ed6703
[...]
[ 830.916161] Internal error: Oops: 96000021 [#1] SMP
[ 830.984755] CPU: 37 PID: 2788 Comm: test_verifier Not tainted 4.16.0-rc2+ #8
[ 830.991790] Hardware name: Huawei TaiShan 2280 /BC11SPCD, BIOS 1.29 07/17/2017
[ 830.998998] pstate: 80400005 (Nzcv daif +PAN -UAO)
[ 831.003793] pc : __ll_sc_atomic_add+0x4/0x18
[ 831.008055] lr : ___bpf_prog_run+0x1198/0x1588
[ 831.012485] sp : ffff00001ccabc20
[ 831.015786] x29: ffff00001ccabc20 x28: ffff8017d56a0f00
[ 831.021087] x27: 0000000000000001 x26: 0000000000000000
[ 831.026387] x25: 000000c168d9db98 x24: 0000000000000000
[ 831.031686] x23: ffff000008203878 x22: ffff000009488000
[ 831.036986] x21: ffff000008b14e28 x20: ffff00001ccabcb0
[ 831.042286] x19: ffff0000097b5080 x18: 0000000000000a03
[ 831.047585] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
[ 831.052885] x15: 0000ffffaeca8000 x14: 0000000000000000
[ 831.058184] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 0000000000000000
[ 831.063484] x11: 0000000000000001 x10: 0000000000000000
[ 831.068783] x9 : 0000000000000000 x8 : 0000000000000000
[ 831.074083] x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : 000580d428000000
[ 831.079383] x5 : 0000000000000018 x4 : 0000000000000000
[ 831.084682] x3 : ffff00001ccabcb0 x2 : 0000000000000001
[ 831.089982] x1 : ffff8097d7ed6703 x0 : 0000000000000001
[ 831.095282] Process test_verifier (pid: 2788, stack limit = 0x0000000018370044)
[ 831.102577] Call trace:
[ 831.105012] __ll_sc_atomic_add+0x4/0x18
[ 831.108923] __bpf_prog_run32+0x4c/0x70
[ 831.112748] bpf_test_run+0x78/0xf8
[ 831.116224] bpf_prog_test_run_xdp+0xb4/0x120
[ 831.120567] SyS_bpf+0x77c/0x1110
[ 831.123873] el0_svc_naked+0x30/0x34
[ 831.127437] Code: 97fffe97 17ffffec 00000000 f9800031 (885f7c31)
Reason for this is because memory is required to be aligned. In
case of BPF, we always enforce alignment in terms of stack access,
but not when accessing map values or packet data when the underlying
arch (e.g. arm64) has CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS set.
xadd on packet data that is local to us anyway is just wrong, so
forbid this case entirely. The only place where xadd makes sense in
fact are map values; xadd on stack is wrong as well, but it's been
around for much longer. Specifically enforce strict alignment in case
of xadd, so that we handle this case generically and avoid such crashes
in the first place.
Fixes: 17a5267067 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
This array appears to be completely unused, remove it.
Signed-off-by: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
One of the ugly leftovers from the early eBPF days is that div/mod
operations based on registers have a hard-coded src_reg == 0 test
in the interpreter as well as in JIT code generators that would
return from the BPF program with exit code 0. This was basically
adopted from cBPF interpreter for historical reasons.
There are multiple reasons why this is very suboptimal and prone
to bugs. To name one: the return code mapping for such abnormal
program exit of 0 does not always match with a suitable program
type's exit code mapping. For example, '0' in tc means action 'ok'
where the packet gets passed further up the stack, which is just
undesirable for such cases (e.g. when implementing policy) and
also does not match with other program types.
While trying to work out an exception handling scheme, I also
noticed that programs crafted like the following will currently
pass the verifier:
0: (bf) r6 = r1
1: (85) call pc+8
caller:
R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1
callee:
frame1: R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_1
10: (b4) (u32) r2 = (u32) 0
11: (b4) (u32) r3 = (u32) 1
12: (3c) (u32) r3 /= (u32) r2
13: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +76)
14: (95) exit
returning from callee:
frame1: R0_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)
R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R2_w=inv0
R3_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=4294967295,var_off=(0x0; 0xffffffff))
R10=fp0,call_1
to caller at 2:
R0_w=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
R10=fp0,call_-1
from 14 to 2: R0=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)
R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1
2: (bf) r1 = r6
3: (61) r1 = *(u32 *)(r1 +80)
4: (bf) r2 = r0
5: (07) r2 += 8
6: (2d) if r2 > r1 goto pc+1
R0=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=8,imm=0) R1=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
R2=pkt(id=0,off=8,r=8,imm=0) R6=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0)
R10=fp0,call_-1
7: (71) r0 = *(u8 *)(r0 +0)
8: (b7) r0 = 1
9: (95) exit
from 6 to 8: safe
processed 16 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 0+0
Basically what happens is that in the subprog we make use of a
div/mod by 0 exception and in the 'normal' subprog's exit path
we just return skb->data back to the main prog. This has the
implication that the verifier thinks we always get a pkt pointer
in R0 while we still have the implicit 'return 0' from the div
as an alternative unconditional return path earlier. Thus, R0
then contains 0, meaning back in the parent prog we get the
address range of [0x0, skb->data_end] as read and writeable.
Similar can be crafted with other pointer register types.
Since i) BPF_ABS/IND is not allowed in programs that contain
BPF to BPF calls (and generally it's also disadvised to use in
native eBPF context), ii) unknown opcodes don't return zero
anymore, iii) we don't return an exception code in dead branches,
the only last missing case affected and to fix is the div/mod
handling.
What we would really need is some infrastructure to propagate
exceptions all the way to the original prog unwinding the
current stack and returning that code to the caller of the
BPF program. In user space such exception handling for similar
runtimes is typically implemented with setjmp(3) and longjmp(3)
as one possibility which is not available in the kernel,
though (kgdb used to implement it in kernel long time ago). I
implemented a PoC exception handling mechanism into the BPF
interpreter with porting setjmp()/longjmp() into x86_64 and
adding a new internal BPF_ABRT opcode that can use a program
specific exception code for all exception cases we have (e.g.
div/mod by 0, unknown opcodes, etc). While this seems to work
in the constrained BPF environment (meaning, here, we don't
need to deal with state e.g. from memory allocations that we
would need to undo before going into exception state), it still
has various drawbacks: i) we would need to implement the
setjmp()/longjmp() for every arch supported in the kernel and
for x86_64, arm64, sparc64 JITs currently supporting calls,
ii) it has unconditional additional cost on main program
entry to store CPU register state in initial setjmp() call,
and we would need some way to pass the jmp_buf down into
___bpf_prog_run() for main prog and all subprogs, but also
storing on stack is not really nice (other option would be
per-cpu storage for this, but it also has the drawback that
we need to disable preemption for every BPF program types).
All in all this approach would add a lot of complexity.
Another poor-man's solution would be to have some sort of
additional shared register or scratch buffer to hold state
for exceptions, and test that after every call return to
chain returns and pass R0 all the way down to BPF prog caller.
This is also problematic in various ways: i) an additional
register doesn't map well into JITs, and some other scratch
space could only be on per-cpu storage, which, again has the
side-effect that this only works when we disable preemption,
or somewhere in the input context which is not available
everywhere either, and ii) this adds significant runtime
overhead by putting conditionals after each and every call,
as well as implementation complexity.
Yet another option is to teach verifier that div/mod can
return an integer, which however is also complex to implement
as verifier would need to walk such fake 'mov r0,<code>; exit;'
sequeuence and there would still be no guarantee for having
propagation of this further down to the BPF caller as proper
exception code. For parent prog, it is also is not distinguishable
from a normal return of a constant scalar value.
The approach taken here is a completely different one with
little complexity and no additional overhead involved in
that we make use of the fact that a div/mod by 0 is undefined
behavior. Instead of bailing out, we adapt the same behavior
as on some major archs like ARMv8 [0] into eBPF as well:
X div 0 results in 0, and X mod 0 results in X. aarch64 and
aarch32 ISA do not generate any traps or otherwise aborts
of program execution for unsigned divides. I verified this
also with a test program compiled by gcc and clang, and the
behavior matches with the spec. Going forward we adapt the
eBPF verifier to emit such rewrites once div/mod by register
was seen. cBPF is not touched and will keep existing 'return 0'
semantics. Given the options, it seems the most suitable from
all of them, also since major archs have similar schemes in
place. Given this is all in the realm of undefined behavior,
we still have the option to adapt if deemed necessary and
this way we would also have the option of more flexibility
from LLVM code generation side (which is then fully visible
to verifier). Thus, this patch i) fixes the panic seen in
above program and ii) doesn't bypass the verifier observations.
[0] ARM Architecture Reference Manual, ARMv8 [ARM DDI 0487B.b]
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/topic/com.arm.doc.ddi0487b.b/DDI0487B_b_armv8_arm.pdf
1) aarch64 instruction set: section C3.4.7 and C6.2.279 (UDIV)
"A division by zero results in a zero being written to
the destination register, without any indication that
the division by zero occurred."
2) aarch32 instruction set: section F1.4.8 and F5.1.263 (UDIV)
"For the SDIV and UDIV instructions, division by zero
always returns a zero result."
Fixes: f4d7e40a5b ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Recent findings by syzcaller fixed in 7891a87efc ("bpf: arsh is
not supported in 32 bit alu thus reject it") triggered a warning
in the interpreter due to unknown opcode not being rejected by
the verifier. The 'return 0' for an unknown opcode is really not
optimal, since with BPF to BPF calls, this would go untracked by
the verifier.
Do two things here to improve the situation: i) perform basic insn
sanity check early on in the verification phase and reject every
non-uapi insn right there. The bpf_opcode_in_insntable() table
reuses the same mapping as the jumptable in ___bpf_prog_run() sans
the non-public mappings. And ii) in ___bpf_prog_run() we do need
to BUG in the case where the verifier would ever create an unknown
opcode due to some rewrites.
Note that JITs do not have such issues since they would punt to
interpreter in these situations. Moreover, the BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON
would also help to avoid such unknown opcodes in the first place.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Given we recently had c131187db2 ("bpf: fix branch pruning
logic") and 95a762e2c8 ("bpf: fix incorrect sign extension in
check_alu_op()") in particular where before verifier skipped
verification of the wrongly assumed dead branch, we should not
just replace the dead code parts with nops (mov r0,r0). If there
is a bug such as fixed in 95a762e2c8 in future again, where
runtime could execute those insns, then one of the potential
issues with the current setting would be that given the nops
would be at the end of the program, we could execute out of
bounds at some point.
The best in such case would be to just exit the BPF program
altogether and return an exception code. However, given this
would require two instructions, and such a dead code gap could
just be a single insn long, we would need to place 'r0 = X; ret'
snippet at the very end after the user program or at the start
before the program (where we'd skip that region on prog entry),
and then place unconditional ja's into the dead code gap.
While more complex but possible, there's still another block
in the road that currently prevents from this, namely BPF to
BPF calls. The issue here is that such exception could be
returned from a callee, but the caller would not know that
it's an exception that needs to be propagated further down.
Alternative that has little complexity is to just use a ja-1
code for now which will trap the execution here instead of
silently doing bad things if we ever get there due to bugs.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Alexei Starovoitov says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2018-01-19
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
The main changes are:
1) bpf array map HW offload, from Jakub.
2) support for bpf_get_next_key() for LPM map, from Yonghong.
3) test_verifier now runs loaded programs, from Alexei.
4) xdp cpumap monitoring, from Jesper.
5) variety of tests, cleanups and small x64 JIT optimization, from Daniel.
6) user space can now retrieve HW JITed program, from Jiong.
Note there is a minor conflict between Russell's arm32 JIT fixes
and removal of bpf_jit_enable variable by Daniel which should
be resolved by keeping Russell's comment and removing that variable.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The BPF verifier conflict was some minor contextual issue.
The TUN conflict was less trivial. Cong Wang fixed a memory leak of
tfile->tx_array in 'net'. This is an skb_array. But meanwhile in
net-next tun changed tfile->tx_arry into tfile->tx_ring which is a
ptr_ring.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Given the limit could potentially get further adjustments in the
future, add it to the log so it becomes obvious what the current
limit is w/o having to check the source first. This may also be
helpful for debugging complexity related issues on kernels that
backport from upstream.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
I've seen two patch proposals now for helper additions that used
ARG_PTR_TO_MEM or similar in reg_X but no corresponding ARG_CONST_SIZE
in reg_X+1. Verifier won't complain in such case, but it will omit
verifying the memory passed to the helper thus ending up badly.
Detect such buggy helper function signature and bail out during
verification rather than finding them through review.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
syzkaller generated a BPF proglet and triggered a warning with
the following:
0: (b7) r0 = 0
1: (d5) if r0 s<= 0x0 goto pc+0
R0=inv0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
2: (1f) r0 -= r1
R0=inv0 R1=ctx(id=0,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0
verifier internal error: known but bad sbounds
What happens is that in the first insn, r0's min/max value
are both 0 due to the immediate assignment, later in the jsle
test the bounds are updated for the min value in the false
path, meaning, they yield smin_val = 1, smax_val = 0, and when
ctx pointer is subtracted from r0, verifier bails out with the
internal error and throwing a WARN since smin_val != smax_val
for the known constant.
For min_val > max_val scenario it means that reg_set_min_max()
and reg_set_min_max_inv() (which both refine existing bounds)
demonstrated that such branch cannot be taken at runtime.
In above scenario for the case where it will be taken, the
existing [0, 0] bounds are kept intact. Meaning, the rejection
is not due to a verifier internal error, and therefore the
WARN() is not necessary either.
We could just reject such cases in adjust_{ptr,scalar}_min_max_vals()
when either known scalars have smin_val != smax_val or
umin_val != umax_val or any scalar reg with bounds
smin_val > smax_val or umin_val > umax_val. However, there
may be a small risk of breakage of buggy programs, so handle
this more gracefully and in adjust_{ptr,scalar}_min_max_vals()
just taint the dst reg as unknown scalar when we see ops with
such kind of src reg.
Reported-by: syzbot+6d362cadd45dc0a12ba4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Alexei found that verifier does not reject stores into context
via BPF_ST instead of BPF_STX. And while looking at it, we
also should not allow XADD variant of BPF_STX.
The context rewriter is only assuming either BPF_LDX_MEM- or
BPF_STX_MEM-type operations, thus reject anything other than
that so that assumptions in the rewriter properly hold. Add
test cases as well for BPF selftests.
Fixes: d691f9e8d4 ("bpf: allow programs to write to certain skb fields")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
BPF map offload follow similar path to program offload. At creation
time users may specify ifindex of the device on which they want to
create the map. Map will be validated by the kernel's
.map_alloc_check callback and device driver will be called for the
actual allocation. Map will have an empty set of operations
associated with it (save for alloc and free callbacks). The real
device callbacks are kept in map->offload->dev_ops because they
have slightly different signatures. Map operations are called in
process context so the driver may communicate with HW freely,
msleep(), wait() etc.
Map alloc and free callbacks are muxed via existing .ndo_bpf, and
are always called with rtnl lock held. Maps and programs are
guaranteed to be destroyed before .ndo_uninit (i.e. before
unregister_netdev() returns). Map callbacks are invoked with
bpf_devs_lock *read* locked, drivers must take care of exclusive
locking if necessary.
All offload-specific branches are marked with unlikely() (through
bpf_map_is_dev_bound()), given that branch penalty will be
negligible compared to IO anyway, and we don't want to penalize
SW path unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
due to some JITs doing if (src_reg == 0) check in 64-bit mode
for div/mod operations mask upper 32-bits of src register
before doing the check
Fixes: 622582786c ("net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT")
Fixes: 7a12b5031c ("sparc64: Add eBPF JIT.")
Reported-by: syzbot+48340bb518e88849e2e3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
BPF alignment tests got a conflict because the registers
are output as Rn_w instead of just Rn in net-next, and
in net a fixup for a testcase prohibits logical operations
on pointers before using them.
Also, we should attempt to patch BPF call args if JIT always on is
enabled. Instead, if we fail to JIT the subprogs we should pass
an error back up and fail immediately.
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The following snippet was throwing an 'unknown opcode cc' warning
in BPF interpreter:
0: (18) r0 = 0x0
2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r0
3: (cc) (u32) r0 s>>= (u32) r0
4: (95) exit
Although a number of JITs do support BPF_ALU | BPF_ARSH | BPF_{K,X}
generation, not all of them do and interpreter does neither. We can
leave existing ones and implement it later in bpf-next for the
remaining ones, but reject this properly in verifier for the time
being.
Fixes: 17a5267067 ("bpf: verifier (add verifier core)")
Reported-by: syzbot+93c4904c5c70348a6890@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in error message text.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Rename the BPF verifier `verbose()` to `bpf_verifier_log_write()` and
export it, so that other components (in particular, drivers for BPF
offload) can reuse the user buffer log to dump error messages at
verification time.
Renaming `verbose()` was necessary in order to avoid a name so generic
to be exported to the global namespace. However to prevent too much pain
for backports, the calls to `verbose()` in the kernel BPF verifier were
not changed. Instead, use function aliasing to make `verbose` point to
`bpf_verifier_log_write`. Another solution could consist in making a
wrapper around `verbose()`, but since it is a variadic function, I don't
see a clean way without creating two identical wrappers, one for the
verifier and one to export.
Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Under speculation, CPUs may mis-predict branches in bounds checks. Thus,
memory accesses under a bounds check may be speculated even if the
bounds check fails, providing a primitive for building a side channel.
To avoid leaking kernel data round up array-based maps and mask the index
after bounds check, so speculated load with out of bounds index will load
either valid value from the array or zero from the padded area.
Unconditionally mask index for all array types even when max_entries
are not rounded to power of 2 for root user.
When map is created by unpriv user generate a sequence of bpf insns
that includes AND operation to make sure that JITed code includes
the same 'index & index_mask' operation.
If prog_array map is created by unpriv user replace
bpf_tail_call(ctx, map, index);
with
if (index >= max_entries) {
index &= map->index_mask;
bpf_tail_call(ctx, map, index);
}
(along with roundup to power 2) to prevent out-of-bounds speculation.
There is secondary redundant 'if (index >= max_entries)' in the interpreter
and in all JITs, but they can be optimized later if necessary.
Other array-like maps (cpumap, devmap, sockmap, perf_event_array, cgroup_array)
cannot be used by unpriv, so no changes there.
That fixes bpf side of "Variant 1: bounds check bypass (CVE-2017-5753)" on
all architectures with and without JIT.
v2->v3:
Daniel noticed that attack potentially can be crafted via syscall commands
without loading the program, so add masking to those paths as well.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
syzbot reported the following panic in the verifier triggered
by kmalloc error injection:
kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
RIP: 0010:copy_func_state kernel/bpf/verifier.c:403 [inline]
RIP: 0010:copy_verifier_state+0x364/0x590 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:431
Call Trace:
pop_stack+0x8c/0x270 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:449
push_stack kernel/bpf/verifier.c:491 [inline]
check_cond_jmp_op kernel/bpf/verifier.c:3598 [inline]
do_check+0x4b60/0xa050 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:4731
bpf_check+0x3296/0x58c0 kernel/bpf/verifier.c:5489
bpf_prog_load+0xa2a/0x1b00 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1198
SYSC_bpf kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1807 [inline]
SyS_bpf+0x1044/0x4420 kernel/bpf/syscall.c:1769
when copy_verifier_state() aborts in the middle due to kmalloc failure
some of the frames could have been partially copied while
current free_verifier_state() loop
for (i = 0; i <= state->curframe; i++)
assumed that all frames are non-null.
Simply fix it by adding 'if (!state)' to free_func_state().
Also avoid stressing copy frame logic more if kzalloc fails
in push_stack() free env->cur_state right away.
Fixes: f4d7e40a5b ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
Reported-by: syzbot+32ac5a3e473f2e01cfc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+fa99e24f3c29d269a7d5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
To allow verifier instruction callbacks without any extra locking
NETDEV_UNREGISTER notification would wait on a waitqueue for verifier
to finish. This design decision was made when rtnl lock was providing
all the locking. Use the read/write lock instead and remove the
workqueue.
Verifier will now call into the offload code, so dev_ops are moved
to offload structure. Since verifier calls are all under
bpf_prog_is_dev_bound() we no longer need static inline implementations
to please builds with CONFIG_NET=n.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Daniel Borkmann says:
====================
pull-request: bpf-next 2017-12-28
The following pull-request contains BPF updates for your *net-next* tree.
The main changes are:
1) Fix incorrect state pruning related to recognition of zero initialized
stack slots, where stacksafe exploration would mistakenly return a
positive pruning verdict too early ignoring other slots, from Gianluca.
2) Various BPF to BPF calls related follow-up fixes. Fix an off-by-one
in maximum call depth check, and rework maximum stack depth tracking
logic to fix a bypass of the total stack size check reported by Jann.
Also fix a bug in arm64 JIT where prog->jited_len was uninitialized.
Addition of various test cases to BPF selftests, from Alexei.
3) Addition of a BPF selftest to test_verifier that is related to BPF to
BPF calls which demonstrates a late caller stack size increase and
thus out of bounds access. Fixed above in 2). Test case from Jann.
4) Addition of correlating BPF helper calls, BPF to BPF calls as well
as BPF maps to bpftool xlated dump in order to allow for better
BPF program introspection and debugging, from Daniel.
5) Fixing several bugs in BPF to BPF calls kallsyms handling in order
to get it actually to work for subprogs, from Daniel.
6) Extending sparc64 JIT support for BPF to BPF calls and fix a couple
of build errors for libbpf on sparc64, from David.
7) Allow narrower context access for BPF dev cgroup typed programs in
order to adapt to LLVM code generation. Also adjust memlock rlimit
in the test_dev_cgroup BPF selftest, from Yonghong.
8) Add netdevsim Kconfig entry to BPF selftests since test_offload.py
relies on netdevsim device being available, from Jakub.
9) Reduce scope of xdp_do_generic_redirect_map() to being static,
from Xiongwei.
10) Minor cleanups and spelling fixes in BPF verifier, from Colin.
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
fix off by one error in max call depth check
and add a test
Fixes: f4d7e40a5b ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Instead of computing max stack depth for current call chain
during the main verifier pass track stack depth of each
function independently and after do_check() is done do
another pass over all instructions analyzing depth
of all possible call stacks.
Fixes: f4d7e40a5b ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Commit cc2b14d510 ("bpf: teach verifier to recognize zero initialized
stack") introduced a very relaxed check when comparing stacks of different
states, effectively returning a positive result in many cases where it
shouldn't.
This can create problems in cases such as this following C pseudocode:
long var;
long *x = bpf_map_lookup(...);
if (!x)
return;
if (*x != 0xbeef)
var = 0;
else
var = 1;
/* This is the key part, calling a helper causes an explored state
* to be saved with the information that "var" is on the stack as
* STACK_ZERO, since the helper is first met by the verifier after
* the "var = 0" assignment. This state will however be wrongly used
* also for the "var = 1" case, so the verifier assumes "var" is always
* 0 and will replace the NULL assignment with nops, because the
* search pruning prevents it from exploring the faulty branch.
*/
bpf_ktime_get_ns();
if (var)
*(long *)0 = 0xbeef;
Fix the issue by making sure that the stack is fully explored before
returning a positive comparison result.
Also attach a couple tests that highlight the bad behavior. In the first
test, without this fix instructions 16 and 17 are replaced with nops
instead of being rejected by the verifier.
The second test, instead, allows a program to make a potentially illegal
read from the stack.
Fixes: cc2b14d510 ("bpf: teach verifier to recognize zero initialized stack")
Signed-off-by: Gianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Lots of overlapping changes. Also on the net-next side
the XDP state management is handled more in the generic
layers so undo the 'net' nfp fix which isn't applicable
in net-next.
Include a necessary change by Jakub Kicinski, with log message:
====================
cls_bpf no longer takes care of offload tracking. Make sure
netdevsim performs necessary checks. This fixes a warning
caused by TC trying to remove a filter it has not added.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
====================
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Right now kallsyms handling is not working with JITed subprogs.
The reason is that when in 1c2a088a66 ("bpf: x64: add JIT support
for multi-function programs") in jit_subprogs() they are passed
to bpf_prog_kallsyms_add(), then their prog type is 0, which BPF
core will think it's a cBPF program as only cBPF programs have a
0 type. Thus, they need to inherit the type from the main prog.
Once that is fixed, they are indeed added to the BPF kallsyms
infra, but their tag is 0. Therefore, since intention is to add
them as bpf_prog_F_<tag>, we need to pass them to bpf_prog_calc_tag()
first. And once this is resolved, there is a use-after-free on
prog cleanup: we remove the kallsyms entry from the main prog,
later walk all subprogs and call bpf_jit_free() on them. However,
the kallsyms linkage was never released on them. Thus, do that
for all subprogs right in __bpf_prog_put() when refcount hits 0.
Fixes: 1c2a088a66 ("bpf: x64: add JIT support for multi-function programs")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Do not allow root to convert valid pointers into unknown scalars.
In particular disallow:
ptr &= reg
ptr <<= reg
ptr += ptr
and explicitly allow:
ptr -= ptr
since pkt_end - pkt == length
1.
This minimizes amount of address leaks root can do.
In the future may need to further tighten the leaks with kptr_restrict.
2.
If program has such pointer math it's likely a user mistake and
when verifier complains about it right away instead of many instructions
later on invalid memory access it's easier for users to fix their progs.
3.
when register holding a pointer cannot change to scalar it allows JITs to
optimize better. Like 32-bit archs could use single register for pointers
instead of a pair required to hold 64-bit scalars.
4.
reduces architecture dependent behavior. Since code:
r1 = r10;
r1 &= 0xff;
if (r1 ...)
will behave differently arm64 vs x64 and offloaded vs native.
A significant chunk of ptr mangling was allowed by
commit f1174f77b5 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
yet some of it was allowed even earlier.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
There were various issues related to the limited size of integers used in
the verifier:
- `off + size` overflow in __check_map_access()
- `off + reg->off` overflow in check_mem_access()
- `off + reg->var_off.value` overflow or 32-bit truncation of
`reg->var_off.value` in check_mem_access()
- 32-bit truncation in check_stack_boundary()
Make sure that any integer math cannot overflow by not allowing
pointer math with large values.
Also reduce the scope of "scalar op scalar" tracking.
Fixes: f1174f77b5 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
This could be made safe by passing through a reference to env and checking
for env->allow_ptr_leaks, but it would only work one way and is probably
not worth the hassle - not doing it will not directly lead to program
rejection.
Fixes: f1174f77b5 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Force strict alignment checks for stack pointers because the tracking of
stack spills relies on it; unaligned stack accesses can lead to corruption
of spilled registers, which is exploitable.
Fixes: f1174f77b5 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
32-bit ALU ops operate on 32-bit values and have 32-bit outputs.
Adjust the verifier accordingly.
Fixes: f1174f77b5 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Properly handle register truncation to a smaller size.
The old code first mirrors the clearing of the high 32 bits in the bitwise
tristate representation, which is correct. But then, it computes the new
arithmetic bounds as the intersection between the old arithmetic bounds and
the bounds resulting from the bitwise tristate representation. Therefore,
when coerce_reg_to_32() is called on a number with bounds
[0xffff'fff8, 0x1'0000'0007], the verifier computes
[0xffff'fff8, 0xffff'ffff] as bounds of the truncated number.
This is incorrect: The truncated number could also be in the range [0, 7],
and no meaningful arithmetic bounds can be computed in that case apart from
the obvious [0, 0xffff'ffff].
Starting with v4.14, this is exploitable by unprivileged users as long as
the unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl isn't set.
Debian assigned CVE-2017-16996 for this issue.
v2:
- flip the mask during arithmetic bounds calculation (Ben Hutchings)
v3:
- add CVE number (Ben Hutchings)
Fixes: b03c9f9fdc ("bpf/verifier: track signed and unsigned min/max values")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Distinguish between
BPF_ALU64|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, sign-extended to 64-bit)
and BPF_ALU|BPF_MOV|BPF_K (load 32-bit immediate, zero-padded to 64-bit);
only perform sign extension in the first case.
Starting with v4.14, this is exploitable by unprivileged users as long as
the unprivileged_bpf_disabled sysctl isn't set.
Debian assigned CVE-2017-16995 for this issue.
v3:
- add CVE number (Ben Hutchings)
Fixes: 484611357c ("bpf: allow access into map value arrays")
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Acked-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Incorrect signed bounds were being computed.
If the old upper signed bound was positive and the old lower signed bound was
negative, this could cause the new upper signed bound to be too low,
leading to security issues.
Fixes: b03c9f9fdc ("bpf/verifier: track signed and unsigned min/max values")
Reported-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Edward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
[jannh@google.com: changed description to reflect bug impact]
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Function skip_callee is local to the source and does not need to
be in global scope, so make it static. Also return NULL rather than 0.
Cleans up two sparse warnings:
symbol 'skip_callee' was not declared. Should it be static?
Using plain integer as NULL pointer
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Trivial fix to spelling mistake in error message text.
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Typical JIT does several passes over bpf instructions to
compute total size and relative offsets of jumps and calls.
With multitple bpf functions calling each other all relative calls
will have invalid offsets intially therefore we need to additional
last pass over the program to emit calls with correct offsets.
For example in case of three bpf functions:
main:
call foo
call bpf_map_lookup
exit
foo:
call bar
exit
bar:
exit
We will call bpf_int_jit_compile() indepedently for main(), foo() and bar()
x64 JIT typically does 4-5 passes to converge.
After these initial passes the image for these 3 functions
will be good except call targets, since start addresses of
foo() and bar() are unknown when we were JITing main()
(note that call bpf_map_lookup will be resolved properly
during initial passes).
Once start addresses of 3 functions are known we patch
call_insn->imm to point to right functions and call
bpf_int_jit_compile() again which needs only one pass.
Additional safety checks are done to make sure this
last pass doesn't produce image that is larger or smaller
than previous pass.
When constant blinding is on it's applied to all functions
at the first pass, since doing it once again at the last
pass can change size of the JITed code.
Tested on x64 and arm64 hw with JIT on/off, blinding on/off.
x64 jits bpf-to-bpf calls correctly while arm64 falls back to interpreter.
All other JITs that support normal BPF_CALL will behave the same way
since bpf-to-bpf call is equivalent to bpf-to-kernel call from
JITs point of view.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
global bpf_jit_enable variable is tested multiple times in JITs,
blinding and verifier core. The malicious root can try to toggle
it while loading the programs. This race condition was accounted
for and there should be no issues, but it's safer to avoid
this race condition.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
though bpf_call is still the same call instruction and
calling convention 'bpf to bpf' and 'bpf to helper' is the same
the interpreter has to oparate on 'struct bpf_insn *'.
To distinguish these two cases add a kernel internal opcode and
mark call insns with it.
This opcode is seen by interpreter only. JITs will never see it.
Also add tiny bit of debug code to aid interpreter debugging.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
programs with function calls are often passing various
pointers via stack. When all calls are inlined llvm
flattens stack accesses and optimizes away extra branches.
When functions are not inlined it becomes the job of
the verifier to recognize zero initialized stack to avoid
exploring paths that program will not take.
The following program would fail otherwise:
ptr = &buffer_on_stack;
*ptr = 0;
...
func_call(.., ptr, ...) {
if (..)
*ptr = bpf_map_lookup();
}
...
if (*ptr != 0) {
// Access (*ptr)->field is valid.
// Without stack_zero tracking such (*ptr)->field access
// will be rejected
}
since stack slots are no longer uniform invalid | spill | misc
add liveness marking to all slots, but do it in 8 byte chunks.
So if nothing was read or written in [fp-16, fp-9] range
it will be marked as LIVE_NONE.
If any byte in that range was read, it will be marked LIVE_READ
and stacksafe() check will perform byte-by-byte verification.
If all bytes in the range were written the slot will be
marked as LIVE_WRITTEN.
This significantly speeds up state equality comparison
and reduces total number of states processed.
before after
bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 2051 2003
bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3287 3164
bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1080 1080
bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 24980 12361
bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 34308 16605
bpf_netdev.o 15404 10962
bpf_overlay.o 7191 6679
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Allow arbitrary function calls from bpf function to another bpf function.
To recognize such set of bpf functions the verifier does:
1. runs control flow analysis to detect function boundaries
2. proceeds with verification of all functions starting from main(root) function
It recognizes that the stack of the caller can be accessed by the callee
(if the caller passed a pointer to its stack to the callee) and the callee
can store map_value and other pointers into the stack of the caller.
3. keeps track of the stack_depth of each function to make sure that total
stack depth is still less than 512 bytes
4. disallows pointers to the callee stack to be stored into the caller stack,
since they will be invalid as soon as the callee returns
5. to reuse all of the existing state_pruning logic each function call
is considered to be independent call from the verifier point of view.
The verifier pretends to inline all function calls it sees are being called.
It stores the callsite instruction index as part of the state to make sure
that two calls to the same callee from two different places in the caller
will be different from state pruning point of view
6. more safety checks are added to liveness analysis
Implementation details:
. struct bpf_verifier_state is now consists of all stack frames that
led to this function
. struct bpf_func_state represent one stack frame. It consists of
registers in the given frame and its stack
. propagate_liveness() logic had a premature optimization where
mark_reg_read() and mark_stack_slot_read() were manually inlined
with loop iterating over parents for each register or stack slot.
Undo this optimization to reuse more complex mark_*_read() logic
. skip_callee() logic is not necessary from safety point of view,
but without it mark_*_read() markings become too conservative,
since after returning from the funciton call a read of r6-r9
will incorrectly propagate the read marks into callee causing
inefficient pruning later
. mark_*_read() logic is now aware of control flow which makes it
more complex. In the future the plan is to rewrite liveness
to be hierarchical. So that liveness can be done within
basic block only and control flow will be responsible for
propagation of liveness information along cfg and between calls.
. tail_calls and ld_abs insns are not allowed in the programs with
bpf-to-bpf calls
. returning stack pointers to the caller or storing them into stack
frame of the caller is not allowed
Testing:
. no difference in cilium processed_insn numbers
. large number of tests follows in next patches
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Allow arbitrary function calls from bpf function to another bpf function.
Since the beginning of bpf all bpf programs were represented as a single function
and program authors were forced to use always_inline for all functions
in their C code. That was causing llvm to unnecessary inflate the code size
and forcing developers to move code to header files with little code reuse.
With a bit of additional complexity teach verifier to recognize
arbitrary function calls from one bpf function to another as long as
all of functions are presented to the verifier as a single bpf program.
New program layout:
r6 = r1 // some code
..
r1 = .. // arg1
r2 = .. // arg2
call pc+1 // function call pc-relative
exit
.. = r1 // access arg1
.. = r2 // access arg2
..
call pc+20 // second level of function call
...
It allows for better optimized code and finally allows to introduce
the core bpf libraries that can be reused in different projects,
since programs are no longer limited by single elf file.
With function calls bpf can be compiled into multiple .o files.
This patch is the first step. It detects programs that contain
multiple functions and checks that calls between them are valid.
It splits the sequence of bpf instructions (one program) into a set
of bpf functions that call each other. Calls to only known
functions are allowed. In the future the verifier may allow
calls to unresolved functions and will do dynamic linking.
This logic supports statically linked bpf functions only.
Such function boundary detection could have been done as part of
control flow graph building in check_cfg(), but it's cleaner to
separate function boundary detection vs control flow checks within
a subprogram (function) into logically indepedent steps.
Follow up patches may split check_cfg() further, but not check_subprogs().
Only allow bpf-to-bpf calls for root only and for non-hw-offloaded programs.
These restrictions can be relaxed in the future.
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Some JITs don't cache skb context on stack in prologue, so when
LD_ABS/IND is used and helper calls yield bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data()
as true, then they temporarily save/restore skb pointer. However,
the assumption that skb always has to be in r1 is a bit of a
gamble. Right now it turned out to be true for all helpers listed
in bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data(), but lets enforce that from verifier
side, so that we make this a guarantee and bail out if the func
proto is misconfigured in future helpers.
In case of BPF helper calls from cBPF, bpf_helper_changes_pkt_data()
is completely unrelevant here (since cBPF is context read-only) and
therefore always false.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
