Have the enums used in __print_symbolic() by the trace_tlb_flush()
tracepoint exported to userpace such that they can be parsed by
userspace tools.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150403013802.220157513@goodmis.org
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Tested-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
When taking a CPU down for suspend and resume, a tracepoint may be called
when the CPU has been designated offline. As tracepoints require RCU for
protection, they must not be called if the current CPU is offline.
Unfortunately, trace_tlb_flush() is called in this scenario as was noted
by LOCKDEP:
...
Disabling non-boot CPUs ...
intel_pstate CPU 1 exiting
===============================
smpboot: CPU 1 didn't die...
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1 Not tainted
-------------------------------
include/trace/events/tlb.h:35 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!
other info that might help us debug this:
RCU used illegally from offline CPU!
rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
no locks held by swapper/1/0.
stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 3.19.0-rc7-next-20150204.1-iniza-small #1
Hardware name: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. 530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH/530U3BI/530U4BI/530U4BH, BIOS 13XK 03/28/2013
0000000000000001 ffff88011a44fe18 ffffffff817e370d 0000000000000011
ffff88011a448290 ffff88011a44fe48 ffffffff810d6847 ffff8800c66b9600
0000000000000001 ffff88011a44c000 ffffffff81cb3900 ffff88011a44fe78
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff817e370d>] dump_stack+0x4c/0x65
[<ffffffff810d6847>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xe7/0x120
[<ffffffff810b71a5>] idle_task_exit+0x205/0x2c0
[<ffffffff81054c4e>] play_dead_common+0xe/0x50
[<ffffffff81054ca5>] native_play_dead+0x15/0x140
[<ffffffff8102963f>] arch_cpu_idle_dead+0xf/0x20
[<ffffffff810cd89e>] cpu_startup_entry+0x37e/0x580
[<ffffffff81053e20>] start_secondary+0x140/0x150
intel_pstate CPU 2 exiting
...
By converting the tlb_flush tracepoint to a TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION where the
condition is cpu_online(smp_processor_id()), we can avoid calling RCU protected
code when the CPU is offline.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+icZUUGiGDoL5NU8RuxKzFjoLjEKRtUWx=JB8B9a0EQv-eGzQ@mail.gmail.com
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.17+
Fixes: d17d8f9ded "x86/mm: Add tracepoints for TLB flushes"
Reported-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Dave Hansen <dave@sr71.net>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
We don't have any good way to figure out what kinds of flushes
are being attempted. Right now, we can try to use the vm
counters, but those only tell us what we actually did with the
hardware (one-by-one vs full) and don't tell us what was actually
_requested_.
This allows us to select out "interesting" TLB flushes that we
might want to optimize (like the ranged ones) and ignore the ones
that we have very little control over (the ones at context
switch).
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140731154059.4C96CBA5@viggo.jf.intel.com
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
