There appear to be some rogue servers out there that issue multiple
delegations with different stateids for the same file. Ensure that when we
return delegations, we do so on a per-stateid basis rather than a per-file
basis.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
- fs/nfs/dir.c:610:8: warning: symbol 'nfs_llseek_dir' was not declared.
Should it be static?
- fs/nfs/dir.c:636:5: warning: symbol 'nfs_fsync_dir' was not declared.
Should it be static?
- fs/nfs/write.c:925:19: warning: symbol 'req' shadows an earlier one
- fs/nfs/write.c:61:6: warning: symbol 'nfs_commit_rcu_free' was not
declared. Should it be static?
- fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c:793:5: warning: symbol 'nfs4_recover_expired_lease'
was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Generalise the nfs_client structure by:
(1) Moving nfs_client to a more general place (nfs_fs_sb.h).
(2) Renaming its maintenance routines to be non-NFS4 specific.
(3) Move those maintenance routines to a new non-NFS4 specific file (client.c)
and move the declarations to internal.h.
(4) Make nfs_find/get_client() take a full sockaddr_in to include the port
number (will be required for NFS2/3).
(5) Make nfs_find/get_client() take the NFS protocol version (again will be
required to differentiate NFS2, 3 & 4 client records).
Also:
(6) Make nfs_client construction proceed akin to inodes, marking them as under
construction and providing a function to indicate completion.
(7) Make nfs_get_client() wait interruptibly if it finds a client that it can
share, but that client is currently being constructed.
(8) Make nfs4_create_client() use (6) and (7) instead of locking cl_sem.
Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Rename nfs_server::nfs4_state to nfs_client as it will be used to represent the
client state for NFS2 and NFS3 also.
Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Rename struct nfs4_client to struct nfs_client so that it can become the basis
for a general client record for NFS2 and NFS3 in addition to NFS4.
Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Upon return of a write delegation, the server will almost always bump the
change attribute. Ensure that we pick up that change so that we don't
invalidate our data cache unnecessarily.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
According to RFC3530 we're supposed to cache the change attribute
at the time the client receives a write delegation.
If the inode is clean, a CB_GETATTR callback by the server to the
client is supposed to return the cached change attribute.
If, OTOH, the inode is dirty, the client should bump the cached
change attribute by 1.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This is the fs/ part of the big kfree cleanup patch.
Remove pointless checks for NULL prior to calling kfree() in fs/.
Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Delegations allow us to cache posix and BSD locks, however when the
delegation is recalled, we need to "flush the cache" and send
the cached LOCK requests to the server.
This patch sets up the mechanism for doing so.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
If the data cache has been marked as potentially invalid by nfs_refresh_inode,
we should invalidate it rather than assume that changes are due to our own
activity.
Also ensure that we always start with a valid cache before declaring it
to be protected by a delegation.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
