2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-22 20:23:57 +08:00
Commit Graph

32 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Russell King
5d4cae5fe2 [ARM] VFP: fix section mismatch error
Fix a real section mismatch issue; the test code is thrown away after
initialisation, but if we do not detect the VFP hardware, it is left
hooked into the exception handler.  Any VFP instructions which are
subsequently executed risk calling the discarded exception handler.

Introduce a new "null" handler which returns to the "unrecognised
fault" return address.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-06-10 12:22:20 +01:00
Russell King
7531a1c2c4 [ARM] Remove unnecessary asm/ptrace.h from VFP support code
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-04-22 10:56:40 +01:00
Catalin Marinas
c642846489 [ARM] 4111/1: Allow VFP to work with thread migration on SMP
The current lazy saving of the VFP registers is no longer possible
with thread migration on SMP. This patch implements a per-CPU
vfp-state pointer and the saving of the VFP registers at every context
switch. The registers restoring is still performed in a lazy way.

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-01-25 16:35:29 +00:00
Russell King
8e140362f7 [ARM] Fix VFP initialisation issue for SMP systems
When we install the handlers for context switching, we must enable
VFP on all CPU cores, otherwise undefined (and random) effects
occur.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2007-01-02 23:40:30 +00:00
Russell King
efe90d273b [ARM] Handle HWCAP_VFP in VFP support code
Don't set HWCAP_VFP in the processor support file; not only does it
depend on the processor features, but it also depends on the support
code being present.  Therefore, only set it if the support code
detects that we have a VFP coprocessor attached.

Also, move the VFP handling of the coprocessor access register into
the VFP support code.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-12-08 16:05:26 +00:00
Takashi Ohmasa
e0f205d9c6 [ARM] 3900/1: Fix VFP Division by Zero exception handling.
The SIGFPE signal should be generated if Division by Zero exception is detected.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Ohmasa <ohmasa.takashi@jp.panasonic.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-10-28 10:15:31 +01:00
Takashi Ohmasa
e816d71a50 [ARM] 3899/1: Fix the normalization of the denormal double precision number.
The significand should be shifted until the value of bit [62] is 1
to normalize the denormal double number.

Signed-off-by: Takashi Ohmasa <ohmasa.takashi@jp.panasonic.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-10-28 10:15:31 +01:00
Al Viro
35d59fc5d6 [PATCH] arm __user annotations
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-11 11:17:05 -07:00
Frederik Deweerdt
42d3fb5a87 [PATCH] arm build fail: vfpsingle.c
It looks like Zach Brown's patch pr_debug-check-pr_debug-arguments
worked as inteded. That is, it doesn't "allow completely incorrect code
to build." :).

The arm build fails with the following message:
  CC      arch/arm/vfp/vfpsingle.o
  arch/arm/vfp/vfpsingle.c: In function `__vfp_single_normaliseround':
  arch/arm/vfp/vfpsingle.c:201: error: `func' undeclared (first use in
  this function)
  arch/arm/vfp/vfpsingle.c:201: error: (Each undeclared identifier is
  reported only once
  arch/arm/vfp/vfpsingle.c:201: error: for each function it appears in.)
  make[1]: *** [arch/arm/vfp/vfpsingle.o] Error 1
  make: *** [arch/arm/vfp] Error 2

The following patch fixes the issue by using func only when DEBUG is
defined.

Signed-off-by: Frederik Deweerdt <frederik.deweerdt@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Zach Brown <zach.brown@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
2006-10-03 08:04:20 -07:00
Russell King
baf97ce6ed [ARM] Cleanups for 4cc9bd2eaa
- Document the meaning for OP_SCALAR, OP_SD and add OP_DD.
- Formatting cleanups
- Remove now redundant code for making compare instructions
  operate on scalar values.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-09-25 10:34:59 +01:00
Gen FUKATSU
4cc9bd2eaa [ARM] 3789/4: Fix VFP emulation to ignore VECITR for scalar instruction
VECITR in Floating-Point Exception register indicates the number of
remaining short vector iterations after a potential exception was
detected.

In case of exception caused by scalar instructions, VECITR is NOT updated.
Therefore emulation for VFP must ignore VECITR field
and treat "veclen" as zero when recognizing scalar instructing.

Signed-off-by: Gen Fukatsu <fukatsu.gen@jp.panasonic.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-09-25 10:34:06 +01:00
Daniel Jacobowitz
6a39dd6222 [ARM] 3759/2: Remove uses of %?
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz

The ARM kernel has several uses of asm("foo%?").  %? is a GCC internal
modifier used to output conditional execution predicates.  However, no
version of GCC supports conditionalizing asm statements.  GCC 4.2 will
correctly expand %? to the empty string in user asms.  Earlier versions may
reuse the condition from the previous instruction.  In 'if (foo) asm
("bar%?");' this is somewhat likely to be right... but not reliable.

So, the only safe thing to do is to remove the uses of %?.  I believe
the tlbflush.h occurances were supposed to be removed before, based
on the comment about %? not working at the top of that file.

Old versions of GCC could omit branches around user asms if the asm didn't
mark the condition codes as clobbered.  This problem hasn't been seen on any
recent (3.x or 4.x) GCC, but it could theoretically happen.  So, where
%? was removed a cc clobber was added.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-09-20 14:58:35 +01:00
Russell King
681a4991f8 [ARM] Optimise VFP thread notify function a little
The common case for the thread notifier is a context switch.  Tell
gcc that this is the most likely condition so it can optimise the
function for this case.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-09-20 14:58:35 +01:00
Daniel Jacobowitz
0355b3e039 [ARM] 3750/3: Fix double VFP emulation for EABI kernels
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz

vfp_put_double didn't work in a CONFIG_AEABI kernel.  By swapping
the arguments, we arrange for them to be in the same place regardless
of ABI.  I made the same change to vfp_put_float for consistency.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-08-30 15:06:39 +01:00
Daniel Jacobowitz
b53a2b41f1 [ARM] 3758/1: Preserve signalling NaNs in conversion
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz

The fcvtds and fcvtsd instructions were generating a qnan bit pattern
for both quiet and signalling NaNs.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-08-27 12:42:14 +01:00
Daniel Jacobowitz
c29ecac18c [ARM] 3749/3: Correct VFP single/double conversion emulation
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz

The fcvtsd/fcvtds emulation was left behind when the numbering of double
precision registers was changed from 0-30 to 0-15.  Both conversion
instructions were writing their results to the wrong register.  Also,
the conversion instructions should stop after the first element even
if a vector length is specified.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-08-27 12:42:10 +01:00
Daniel Jacobowitz
7c6f25141b [ARM] 3748/3: Correct error check in vfp_raise_exceptions
Patch from Daniel Jacobowitz

The recent fix to hide VFP_NAN_FLAG broke the check in vfp_raise_exceptions;
it would attempt to deliver an exception mask of 0xfffffeff instead of reporting
a serious error condition using printk.  Define a safe constant to use for
an invalid exception maskm, and use it at both ends.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@codesourcery.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-08-27 12:42:08 +01:00
Jörn Engel
6ab3d5624e Remove obsolete #include <linux/config.h>
Signed-off-by: Jörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de>
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
2006-06-30 19:25:36 +02:00
Russell King
1a6be26d5b [ARM] Enable VFP to be built when non-VFP capable CPUs are selected
Since we pass flags to the compiler to control code generation based
on the least capable selected CPU, if we want to include VFP support,
we must tweak the assembler flags to allow the VFP instructions.
Moreover, we must not use the mrrc/mcrr versions since these will not
be recognised by the assembler.

We do not convert all instructions to the VFP-equivalent (yet) since
binutils appears to barf on "fmrx rn, fpinst" and doesn't provide any
other way (other than using the mrc equivalent) to encode this
instruction - which is rather a problem when you have a VFP
implementation which requires these instructions.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-06-22 10:24:24 +01:00
Russell King
d6551e884c [ARM] Add thread_notify infrastructure
Some machine classes need to allow VFP support to be built into the
kernel, but still allow the kernel to run even though VFP isn't
present.  Unfortunately, the kernel hard-codes VFP instructions
into the thread switch, which prevents this being run-time selectable.

Solve this by introducing a notifier which things such as VFP can
hook into to be informed of events which affect the VFP subsystem
(eg, creation and destruction of threads, switches between threads.)

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-06-22 10:24:18 +01:00
George G. Davis
b7d7ef87e1 [ARM] 3499/1: Fix VFP FPSCR corruption for double exception case
Patch from George G. Davis

The ARM VFP FPSCR register is corrupted when a condition flags modifying
VFP instruction is followed by a non-condition flags modifying VFP
instruction and both instructions raise exceptions.  The fix is to
read the current FPSCR in between emulation of these two instructions
and use the current FPSCR value when handling the second exception.

Signed-off-by: George G. Davis <gdavis@mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-05-05 22:32:23 +01:00
Russell King
928bd1b470 [ARM] vfp: fix leak of VFP_NAN_FLAG into FPSCR
The VFP code can leak VFP_NAN_FLAG into the FPSCR. It doesn't correspond
to any real FPSCR bit (and overlaps one of the exception flags).

Bug report from Daniel Jacobowitz

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-04-25 20:41:27 +01:00
Catalin Marinas
1356c1948d [ARM] 3473/1: Use numbers 0-15 for the VFP double registers
Patch from Catalin Marinas

This patch changes the double registers numbering to 0-15 from even 0-30,
in preparation for future VFP extensions. It also fixes the VFP_REG_ZERO
bug (value 16 actually represents the 8th double register with the original
numbering).

The original mcrr/mrrc on CP10 were generating FMRRS/FMSRR instead of
FMRRD/FMDRR. The patch changes to CP11 for the correct instructions.

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-04-10 21:32:46 +01:00
Catalin Marinas
1320a80d1d [ARM] 3471/1: FTOSI functions should return 0 for NaN
Patch from Catalin Marinas

The NaN case was dealed with by the "exponent >= ... + 32" condition but it
was not setting the value "d" to 0.

Signed-off-by: Ken'ichi Kuromusha <musha@aplix.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-04-10 21:32:39 +01:00
Catalin Marinas
80ed354725 [ARM] 3398/1: Fix the VFP registers loading/storing base address
Patch from Catalin Marinas

The current VFP code corrupts the VFP registers (including the control
ones) if more than one floating point application is executed at the same
time. This patch fixes the updating of the load/store base addresses for
the VFP registers.

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-03-25 21:58:00 +00:00
Russell King
9c42954dfd [ARM] Move enable_irq and disable_irq to assembler.h
5d25ac038a broke VFP builds due to
enable_irq not being defined as an assembly macro.  Move it to
assembler.h so everyone can use it.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-03-23 16:59:37 +00:00
Russell King
5d25ac038a [ARM] Move IRQ enable after coprocessor number decode
Allow the individual coprocessor handlers to decide when to enable
interrupts, rather than unconditionally enabling them.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2006-03-21 22:05:50 +00:00
Sam Ravnborg
e6ae744dd2 kbuild: arm - use generic asm-offsets.h support
Delete obsoleted stuff from arch Makefile and rename
constants.h to asm-offsets.h

Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
2005-09-09 21:08:59 +02:00
Catalin Marinas
7b1fbf292b [PATCH] ARM: 2841/1: Fix VFP +/-0 case for doubles addition
Patch from Catalin Marinas

The IEEE 754 standard specifies that the result of (x - x), where x is
a valid number, should be -0 if the rounding mode is towards minus
infinity or +0 otherwise.

Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-08-03 19:53:25 +01:00
Russell King
da41119af7 [PATCH] ARM: Don't force SIGFPE
We were forcing SIGFPE on to a user program for no good reason.
Use send_sig_info() instead.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-06-29 23:02:02 +01:00
Russell King
438a761679 [PATCH] ARM: Fix VFP to use do_div()
VFP used __divdi3 64-bit division needlessly.  Convert it to use
our 64-bit by 32-bit division instead.

Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
2005-06-29 23:01:02 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00