2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-28 23:23:55 +08:00
Commit Graph

458 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
NeilBrown
749586b7d3 md/raid5: use async_tx_quiesce() instead of open-coding it.
handle_stripe_expansion contains:

        if (tx) {
                async_tx_ack(tx);
                dma_wait_for_async_tx(tx);
        }

which is very similar to the body of async_tx_quiesce(),
except that the later handles an error from dma_wait_for_async_tx()
(admittedly by panicing, but that decision belongs in the dma
code, not the md code).

So just us async_tx_quiesce().

Acked-by: Dan Williams <djbw@fb.com>
Reported-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-12-13 19:52:32 +11:00
NeilBrown
ca64cae960 md/raid5: Make sure we clear R5_Discard when discard is finished.
commit 9e44476851
    MD: raid5 avoid unnecessary zero page for trim

change raid5 to clear R5_Discard when the complete request is
handled rather than when submitting the per-device discard request.
However it did not clear R5_Discard for the parity device.

This means that if the stripe_head was reused before it expired from
the cache, the setting would be wrong and a hang would result.

Also if the R5_Uptodate bit happens to be set, R5_Discard again
won't be cleared.  But R5_Uptodate really should be clear at this point.

So make sure R5_Discard is cleared in all cases, and clear
R5_Uptodate when a 'discard' completes.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-11-22 09:14:13 +11:00
NeilBrown
ef5b7c69b7 md/raid5: move resolving of reconstruct_state earlier in
stripe_handle.

The chunk of code in stripe_handle which responds to a
*_result value in reconstruct_state is really the completion
of some processing that happened outside of handle_stripe
(possibly asynchronously) and so should be one of the first
things done in handle_stripe().

After the next patch it will be important that it happens before
handle_stripe_clean_event(), as that will clear some dev->flags
bit that this code tests.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-11-22 09:14:09 +11:00
NeilBrown
4ac6875eeb md/raid5: round discard alignment up to power of 2.
blkdev_issue_discard currently assumes that the granularity
is a power of 2.  So in raid5, round the chosen number up to
avoid embarrassment.

Cc: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-11-20 19:42:56 +11:00
Linus Torvalds
9db908806b md updates for 3.7
"discard" support, some dm-raid improvements and other assorted
 bits and pieces.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iQIVAwUAUHk6Rjnsnt1WYoG5AQKovQ//Ym0ROo5a6uekb2USLyFSdQH3TC7z0v0+
 +kujrgoc4nHZU/vj5yfMvPVomEUsAhHEwTkvvCiXFFHn6cxPzC8ezm8d40xEeISX
 qp6i2bPlvGURhsW1tYeD+THtY82/oyzQ4Wa/vaE1sjVLQ+caa2q7kVVgAL9Bj/Kz
 aESIZjAuPxQNE1674/KR0EmMFcbpd0z1WDV+ydKlRV5jHCHGYf8OmxOenJFf+V/b
 /f9p2u+NUq5BN5WLhThcysO8lPX1Y7GG8IYay3DlSt/crU24R2a2j0qh/BDoK8+t
 /DceoHipbIiGxXLVjM7y+1RwPpCh75HJSZQHltPype2Z3iwtwEth9uTkEE3M2h/W
 tOQEbOZku0kcgsrys7JBmpkBwkR9oZqq1kDd4YBzqW4PiGVP6z0JRH8QpjjB+mjN
 47ODYIZcaEYZ+0Jj8kcVxo3gv4Xj4DWH+auSNZihTVmjQPVqrcy3CAt3CkuDzTkY
 34fZVuCDiCetLGCGQKrwfMDnySVy5xOmtC6iWsEY5rExAeb0E+BCzcBvbAXzt+ef
 MPDsrxWbo/ZkvpuwXOwLFTccBuRtAsFi7CM4jcow53W6XMnPpdubphNw5nylaEm1
 DEzfID58mv8VHWRuW15vr7SbtROjYJkEFCIaEK3oprrRUYftZntIABcknqvcIYR+
 /ULNzkRU1w4=
 =XRmL
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'md-3.7' of git://neil.brown.name/md

Pull md updates from NeilBrown:
 - "discard" support, some dm-raid improvements and other assorted bits
   and pieces.

* tag 'md-3.7' of git://neil.brown.name/md: (29 commits)
  md: refine reporting of resync/reshape delays.
  md/raid5: be careful not to resize_stripes too big.
  md: make sure manual changes to recovery checkpoint are saved.
  md/raid10: use correct limit variable
  md: writing to sync_action should clear the read-auto state.
  Subject: [PATCH] md:change resync_mismatches to atomic64_t to avoid races
  md/raid5: make sure to_read and to_write never go negative.
  md: When RAID5 is dirty, force reconstruct-write instead of read-modify-write.
  md/raid5: protect debug message against NULL derefernce.
  md/raid5: add some missing locking in handle_failed_stripe.
  MD: raid5 avoid unnecessary zero page for trim
  MD: raid5 trim support
  md/bitmap:Don't use IS_ERR to judge alloc_page().
  md/raid1: Don't release reference to device while handling read error.
  raid: replace list_for_each_continue_rcu with new interface
  add further __init annotations to crypto/xor.c
  DM RAID: Fix for "sync" directive ineffectiveness
  DM RAID: Fix comparison of index and quantity for "rebuild" parameter
  DM RAID: Add rebuild capability for RAID10
  DM RAID: Move 'rebuild' checking code to its own function
  ...
2012-10-13 13:22:01 -07:00
NeilBrown
e56108d65f md/raid5: be careful not to resize_stripes too big.
When a RAID5 is reshaping, conf->raid_disks is increased
before mddev->delta_disks becomes zero.
This can result in check_reshape calling resize_stripes with a
number that is too large.  This particularly happens
when md_check_recovery calls ->check_reshape().

If we use ->previous_raid_disks, we don't risk this.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 14:24:13 +11:00
Jianpeng Ma
7f7583d420 Subject: [PATCH] md:change resync_mismatches to atomic64_t to avoid races
Now that multiple threads can handle stripes, it is safer to
use an atomic64_t for resync_mismatches, to avoid update races.

Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 14:17:59 +11:00
NeilBrown
1ed850f356 md/raid5: make sure to_read and to_write never go negative.
to_read and to_write are part of the result of analysing
a stripe before handling it.
Their use is to avoid some loops and tests if the values are
known to be zero.  Thus it is not a problem if they are a
little bit larger than they should be.

So decrementing them in handle_failed_stripe serves little value, and
due to races it could cause some loops to be skipped incorrectly.

So remove those decrements.

Reported-by: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:50:13 +11:00
Alexander Lyakas
a7854487cd md: When RAID5 is dirty, force reconstruct-write instead of read-modify-write.
Signed-off-by: Alex Lyakas <alex@zadarastorage.com>
Suggested-by: Yair Hershko <yair@zadarastorage.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:50:12 +11:00
NeilBrown
b97390aec4 md/raid5: protect debug message against NULL derefernce.
The pr_debug in add_stripe_bio could race with something
changing *bip, so it is best to hold the lock until
after the pr_debug.

Reported-by: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:50:12 +11:00
NeilBrown
143c4d0573 md/raid5: add some missing locking in handle_failed_stripe.
We really should hold the stripe_lock while accessing
'toread' else we could race with add_stripe_bio and corrupt
a list.

Reported-by: "Jianpeng Ma" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:50:12 +11:00
Shaohua Li
9e44476851 MD: raid5 avoid unnecessary zero page for trim
We want to avoid zero discarded dev page, because it's useless for discard.
But if we don't zero it, another read/write hit such page in the cache and will
get inconsistent data.

To avoid zero the page, we don't set R5_UPTODATE flag after construction is
done. In this way, discard write request is still issued and finished, but read
will not hit the page. If the stripe gets accessed soon, we need reread the
stripe, but since the chance is low, the reread isn't a big deal.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:49:49 +11:00
Shaohua Li
620125f2bf MD: raid5 trim support
Discard for raid4/5/6 has limitation. If discard request size is
small, we do discard for one disk, but we need calculate parity and
write parity disk.  To correctly calculate parity, zero_after_discard
must be guaranteed. Even it's true, we need do discard for one disk
but write another disks, which makes the parity disks wear out
fast. This doesn't make sense. So an efficient discard for raid4/5/6
should discard all data disks and parity disks, which requires the
write pattern to be (A, A+chunk_size, A+chunk_size*2...). If A's size
is smaller than chunk_size, such pattern is almost impossible in
practice. So in this patch, I only handle the case that A's size
equals to chunk_size. That is discard request should be aligned to
stripe size and its size is multiple of stripe size.

Since we can only handle request with specific alignment and size (or
part of the request fitting stripes), we can't guarantee
zero_after_discard even zero_after_discard is true in low level
drives.

The block layer doesn't send down correctly aligned requests even
correct discard alignment is set, so I must filter out.

For raid4/5/6 parity calculation, if data is 0, parity is 0. So if
zero_after_discard is true for all disks, data is consistent after
discard.  Otherwise, data might be lost. Let's consider a scenario:
discard a stripe, write data to one disk and write parity disk. The
stripe could be still inconsistent till then depending on using data
from other data disks or parity disks to calculate new parity. If the
disk is broken, we can't restore it. So in this patch, we only enable
discard support if all disks have zero_after_discard.

If discard fails in one disk, we face the similar inconsistent issue
above. The patch will make discard follow the same path as normal
write request. If discard fails, a resync will be scheduled to make
the data consistent. This isn't good to have extra writes, but data
consistency is important.

If a subsequent read/write request hits raid5 cache of a discarded
stripe, the discarded dev page should have zero filled, so the data is
consistent. This patch will always zero dev page for discarded request
stripe. This isn't optimal because discard request doesn't need such
payload. Next patch will avoid it.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:49:05 +11:00
Shaohua Li
4ed8731d8e MD: change the parameter of md thread
Change the thread parameter, so the thread can carry extra info. Next patch
will use it.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-10-11 13:34:00 +11:00
NeilBrown
cb13ff69d6 md/raid5: add missing spin_lock_init.
commit b17459c050
   raid5: add a per-stripe lock

added a spin_lock to the 'stripe_head' struct.
Unfortunately there are two places where this struct is allocated
but the spin lock was only initialised in one of them.

So add the missing spin_lock_init.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-09-24 16:27:20 +10:00
NeilBrown
e5c86471f9 md/raid5: fix calculate of 'degraded' when a replacement becomes active.
When a replacement device becomes active, we mark the device that it
replaces as 'faulty' so that it can subsequently get removed.
However 'calc_degraded' only pays attention to the primary device, not
the replacement, so the array appears to become degraded, which is
wrong.

So teach 'calc_degraded' to consider any replacement if a primary
device is faulty.

This is suitable for -stable as an incorrect 'degraded' value can
confuse md and could lead to data corruption.
This is only relevant for 3.3 and later.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Robin Hill <robin@robinhill.me.uk>
Reported-by: John Drescher <drescherjm@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-09-19 12:52:30 +10:00
NeilBrown
a852d7b8a0 Revert "md/raid5: For odirect-write performance, do not set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE."
This reverts commit 895e3c5c58.

While this patch seemed like a good idea and did help some workloads,
it hurts other workloads.
Large sequential O_DIRECT writes were faster,
Small random O_DIRECT writes were slower.

Other changes (batching RAID5 writes) have improved the sequential
writes using a different mechanism, so the net result of this patch
is definitely negative.  So revert it.

Reported-by: Shaohua Li <shli@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-09-19 12:48:30 +10:00
Linus Torvalds
25aa6a7ae4 Additional md update for 3.6
This contains a few patches that depend on
 plugging changes in the block layer so needs to wait
 for those.
 It also contains a Kconfig fix for the new RAID10 support
 in dm-raid.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iQIVAwUAUBnKUznsnt1WYoG5AQJOQA/+M7RoVnF63+TbGIqdNDotuF8FxvudCZBl
 Ou2yG47EOPtWf/RoqPyfpydDgdjyXsk4T5TfXoc0hsXVr4shCYo51uT9K34TMSDJ
 2GzGWuyugRJFyvxW7PBgM+zFWlcVdgUGcwsdmIUMtHRz8Q10TqO5fE22RNLkhwOl
 fvGCK1KYnQqlG87DbulHWMo22vyZVic8jBqFSw55CPuuFMSJMxCw0rOPUnvk5Q8v
 jWzZzuUqrM8iiOxTDHsbCA0IleCbGl/m0tgk02Vj4tkCvz9N/xzQW2se0H6uECiK
 k8odbAiNBOh1q135sa7ASrBzxT+JqSiQ25rLheTEzzNxjFv6/NlntXmYu6HB+lD3
 DoHAvRjgMxiLCdisW6TJb10NItitXwE/HSpQOVRxyYtINdzmhIDaCccgfN8ZMkho
 nmE/uzO+CAoCFpZC2C/nY8D0BZs5fw4hgDAsci66mvs+88dy+SoA4AbyNEMAusOS
 tiL8ZEjnYXvxTh3JFaMIaqQd6PkbahmtEtvorwXsUYUdY0ybkcs2FYVksvkgYdyW
 WlejOZVurY2i5biqck3UqjesxeJA5TMAlAUQR7vXu1Fa9fYFXZbqJom/KnPRTfek
 xerCWPMbhuzmcyEjUOGfjs6GFEnEmRT6Q6fN3CBaQMS2Q/z+6AkTOXKVl5Fhvoyl
 aeu1m8nZLuI=
 =ovN2
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'md-3.6' of git://neil.brown.name/md

Pull additional md update from NeilBrown:
 "This contains a few patches that depend on plugging changes in the
  block layer so needed to wait for those.

  It also contains a Kconfig fix for the new RAID10 support in dm-raid."

* tag 'md-3.6' of git://neil.brown.name/md:
  md/dm-raid: DM_RAID should select MD_RAID10
  md/raid1: submit IO from originating thread instead of md thread.
  raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way
  raid5: make_request use batch stripe release
2012-08-02 11:34:40 -07:00
Shaohua Li
46a06401f6 raid5: raid5d handle stripe in batch way
Let raid5d handle stripe in batch way to reduce conf->device_lock locking.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-08-02 08:33:15 +10:00
Shaohua Li
8811b5968f raid5: make_request use batch stripe release
make_request() does stripe release for every stripe and the stripe usually has
count 1, which makes previous release_stripe() optimization not work. In my
test, this release_stripe() becomes the heaviest pleace to take
conf->device_lock after previous patches applied.

Below patch makes stripe release batch. All the stripes will be released in
unplug. The STRIPE_ON_UNPLUG_LIST bit is to protect concurrent access stripe
lru.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-08-02 08:33:00 +10:00
Linus Torvalds
eff0d13f38 Merge branch 'for-3.6/drivers' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block
Pull block driver changes from Jens Axboe:

 - Making the plugging support for drivers a bit more sane from Neil.
   This supersedes the plugging change from Shaohua as well.

 - The usual round of drbd updates.

 - Using a tail add instead of a head add in the request completion for
   ndb, making us find the most completed request more quickly.

 - A few floppy changes, getting rid of a duplicated flag and also
   running the floppy init async (since it takes forever in boot terms)
   from Andi.

* 'for-3.6/drivers' of git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block:
  floppy: remove duplicated flag FD_RAW_NEED_DISK
  blk: pass from_schedule to non-request unplug functions.
  block: stack unplug
  blk: centralize non-request unplug handling.
  md: remove plug_cnt feature of plugging.
  block/nbd: micro-optimization in nbd request completion
  drbd: announce FLUSH/FUA capability to upper layers
  drbd: fix max_bio_size to be unsigned
  drbd: flush drbd work queue before invalidate/invalidate remote
  drbd: fix potential access after free
  drbd: call local-io-error handler early
  drbd: do not reset rs_pending_cnt too early
  drbd: reset congestion information before reporting it in /proc/drbd
  drbd: report congestion if we are waiting for some userland callback
  drbd: differentiate between normal and forced detach
  drbd: cleanup, remove two unused global flags
  floppy: Run floppy initialization asynchronous
2012-08-01 09:06:47 -07:00
NeilBrown
0021b7bc04 md: remove plug_cnt feature of plugging.
This seemed like a good idea at the time, but after further thought I
cannot see it making a difference other than very occasionally and
testing to try to exercise the case it is most likely to help did not
show any performance difference by removing it.

So remove the counting of active plugs and allow 'pending writes' to
be activated at any time, not just when no plugs are active.

This is only relevant when there is a write-intent bitmap, and the
updating of the bitmap will likely introduce enough delay that
the single-threading of bitmap updates will be enough to collect large
numbers of updates together.

Removing this will make it easier to centralise the unplug code, and
will clear the other for other unplug enhancements which have a
measurable effect.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2012-07-31 09:08:14 +02:00
majianpeng
895e3c5c58 md/raid5: For odirect-write performance, do not set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE.
'sync' writes set both REQ_SYNC and REQ_NOIDLE.
O_DIRECT writes set REQ_SYNC but not REQ_NOIDLE.

We currently assume that a REQ_SYNC request will not be followed by
more requests and so set STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE to expedite the
request.
This is appropriate for sync requests, but not for O_DIRECT requests.

So make the setting of STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE conditional on REQ_NOIDLE
rather than REQ_SYNC.  This is consistent with the documented meaning
of REQ_NOIDLE:

        __REQ_NOIDLE,           /* don't anticipate more IO after this one */

Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-31 10:05:44 +10:00
majianpeng
3f9e7c140e raid5: Add R5_ReadNoMerge flag which prevent bio from merging at block layer
Because bios will merge at block-layer,so bios-error may caused by other
bio which be merged into to the same request.
Using this flag,it will find exactly error-sector and not do redundant
operation like re-write and re-read.

V0->V1:Using REQ_FLUSH instead REQ_NOMERGE avoid bio merging at block
layer.

Signed-off-by: Jianpeng Ma <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-31 10:04:21 +10:00
Shaohua Li
b17459c050 raid5: add a per-stripe lock
Add a per-stripe lock to protect stripe specific data. The purpose is to reduce
lock contention of conf->device_lock.

stripe ->toread, ->towrite are protected by per-stripe lock.  Accessing bio
list of the stripe is always serialized by this lock, so adding bio to the
lists (add_stripe_bio()) and removing bio from the lists (like
ops_run_biofill()) not race.

If bio in ->read, ->written ... list are not shared by multiple stripes, we
don't need any lock to protect ->read, ->written, because STRIPE_ACTIVE will
protect them. If the bio are shared,  there are two protections:
1. bi_phys_segments acts as a reference count
2. traverse the list uses r5_next_bio, which makes traverse never access bio
not belonging to the stripe

Let's have an example:
|  stripe1 |  stripe2    |  stripe3  |
...bio1......|bio2|bio3|....bio4.....

stripe2 has 4 bios, when it's finished, it will decrement bi_phys_segments for
all bios, but only end_bio for bio2 and bio3. bio1->bi_next still points to
bio2, but this doesn't matter. When stripe1 is finished, it will not touch bio2
because of r5_next_bio check. Next time stripe1 will end_bio for bio1 and
stripe3 will end_bio bio4.

before add_stripe_bio() addes a bio to a stripe, we already increament the bio
bi_phys_segments, so don't worry other stripes release the bio.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-19 16:01:31 +10:00
Shaohua Li
7eaf7e8eb3 raid5: remove unnecessary bitmap write optimization
Neil pointed out the bitmap write optimization in handle_stripe_clean_event()
is unnecessary, because the chance one stripe gets written twice in the mean
time is rare. We can always do a bitmap_startwrite when a write request is
added to a stripe and bitmap_endwrite after write request is done.  Delete the
optimization. With it, we can delete some cases of device_lock.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-19 16:01:31 +10:00
Shaohua Li
e7836bd6f6 raid5: lockless access raid5 overrided bi_phys_segments
Raid5 overrides bio->bi_phys_segments, accessing it is with device_lock hold,
which is unnecessary, We can make it lockless actually.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-19 16:01:31 +10:00
Shaohua Li
4eb788df67 raid5: reduce chance release_stripe() taking device_lock
release_stripe() is a place conf->device_lock is heavily contended. We take the
lock even stripe count isn't 1, which isn't required.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-19 16:01:31 +10:00
NeilBrown
b357f04a67 md: fix up plugging (again).
The value returned by "mddev_check_plug" is only valid until the
next 'schedule' as that will unplug things.  This could happen at any
call to mempool_alloc.
So just calling mddev_check_plug at the start doesn't really make
sense.

So call it just before, or just after, queuing things for the thread.
As the action that happens at unplug is to wake the thread, this makes
lots of sense.
If we cannot add a plug (which requires a small GFP_ATOMIC alloc) we
wake thread immediately.

RAID5 is a bit different.  Requests are queued for the thread and the
thread is woken by release_stripe.  So we don't need to wake the
thread on failure.
However the thread doesn't perform certain actions when there is any
active plug, so it is important to install a plug before waking the
thread.  So for RAID5 we install the plug *before* queuing the request
and waking the thread.

Without this patch it is possible for raid1 or raid10 to queue a
request without then waking the thread, resulting in the array locking
up.

Also change raid10 to only flush_pending_write when there are not
active plugs, just like raid1.

This patch is suitable for 3.0 or later.  I plan to submit it to
-stable, but I'll like to let it spend a few weeks in mainline
first to be sure it is completely safe.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 17:45:31 +10:00
Shaohua Li
fab363b5ff raid5: delayed stripe fix
There isn't locking setting STRIPE_DELAYED and STRIPE_PREREAD_ACTIVE bits, but
the two bits have relationship. A delayed stripe can be moved to hold list only
when preread active stripe count is below IO_THRESHOLD. If a stripe has both
the bits set, such stripe will be in delayed list and preread count not 0,
which will make such stripe never leave delayed list.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 15:57:19 +10:00
majianpeng
2e8ac30312 md/raid456: When read error cannot be recovered, record bad block
We may not be able to fix a bad block if:
 - the array is degraded
 - the over-write fails.

In these cases we currently eject the device, but we should
record a bad block if possible.

Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 15:57:02 +10:00
NeilBrown
0232605d98 md: make 'name' arg to md_register_thread non-optional.
Having the 'name' arg optional and defaulting to the current
personality name is no necessary and leads to errors, as when
changing the level of an array we can end up using the
name of the old level instead of the new one.

So make it non-optional and always explicitly pass the name
of the level that the array will be.

Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 15:56:52 +10:00
NeilBrown
5f066c632f md/raid5: fix refcount problem when blocked_rdev is set.
commit 43220aa0f2
    md/raid5: fix a hang on device failure.

fixed a hang, but introduced a refcounting in-balance so
that if the presence of bad-blocks ever caused an rdev to
be 'blocked' we would increment the refcount on the rdev and
never decrement it.

So added the needed rdev_dec_pending when md_wait_for_blocked_rdev
is not called.

Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 12:13:29 +10:00
majianpeng
1850753d2e md/raid5: In ops_run_io, inc nr_pending before calling md_wait_for_blocked_rdev
In ops_run_io(), the call to md_wait_for_blocked_rdev will decrement
nr_pending so we lose the reference we hold on the rdev.
So atomic_inc it first to maintain the reference.

This bug was introduced by commit  73e92e51b7
    md/raid5.  Don't write to known bad block on doubtful devices.

which appeared in 3.0, so patch is suitable for stable kernels since
then.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 12:11:54 +10:00
majianpeng
6c0544e255 md/raid5: Do not add data_offset before call to is_badblock
In chunk_aligned_read() we are adding data_offset before calling
is_badblock.  But is_badblock also adds data_offset, so that is bad.

So move the addition of data_offset to after the call to
is_badblock.

This bug was introduced by commit 31c176ecdf
     md/raid5: avoid reading from known bad blocks.
which first appeared in 3.0.  So that patch is suitable for any
-stable kernel from 3.0.y onwards.  However it will need minor
revision for most of those (as the comment didn't appear until
recently).

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 12:09:57 +10:00
NeilBrown
5cfb22a1f8 md/raid5: prefer replacing failed devices over want-replacement devices.
If a RAID5 has both a failed device and a device marked as
'WantReplacement', then we should preferentially replace the failed
device.
However the current code replaces whichever is found first.
So split into 2 loops, check fail failed/missing first, and only check
for WantReplacement if nothing is failed or missing.

Reported-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-07-03 11:46:53 +10:00
NeilBrown
da7613b8b0 md/raid5: improve removal of extra devices after reshape.
After a reshape which reduced the number of devices we need
to disconnect the extra devices.
The code for this doesn't currently handle 'replacement' devices.
It is very unlikely that such devices will be present, but it is
safest to handle them anyway.

So simplify the handling.  Just clear In_sync and leave it
to remove_and_add_spaces (which will be called soon) to do
the real works.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-22 13:55:33 +10:00
NeilBrown
30b67645fa md/raid5: Allow reshape while a bitmap is present.
We always should have allowed this.  A raid5 reshape doesn't change
the size of the bitmap, so not need to restrict it.

Also add a test to make sure we don't try to start a reshape on a
failed array.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-22 13:55:28 +10:00
NeilBrown
a4a6125a07 md: allow array to be resized while bitmap is present.
Now that bitmaps can be resized, we can allow an array to be resized
while the bitmap is present.

This only covers resizing that involves changing the effective size
of member devices, not resizing that changes the number of devices.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-22 13:55:27 +10:00
Shaohua Li
bc0934f047 raid5: support sync request
REQ_SYNC is ignored in current raid5 code. Block layer does use it to do
policy,
for example ioscheduler. This patch adds it.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-22 13:55:05 +10:00
Shaohua Li
cceeca43b5 raid5: remove unused variables
The two variables are useless.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-22 13:55:04 +10:00
NeilBrown
b5254dd5fd md/raid5: allow for change in data_offset while managing a reshape.
The important issue here is incorporating the different in data_offset
into calculations concerning when we might need to over-write data
that is still thought to be valid.

To this end we find the minimum offset difference across all devices
and add that where appropriate.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-21 09:27:01 +10:00
NeilBrown
05616be5e1 md/raid5: Use correct data_offset for all IO.
As there can now be two different data_offsets - an 'old' and
a 'new' - we need to carefully choose between them.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-21 09:27:00 +10:00
NeilBrown
c6563a8c38 md: add possibility to change data-offset for devices.
When reshaping we can avoid costly intermediate backup by
changing the 'start' address of the array on the device
(if there is enough room).

So as a first step, allow such a change to be requested
through sysfs, and recorded in v1.x metadata.

(As we didn't previous check that all 'pad' fields were zero,
 we need a new FEATURE flag for this.
 A (belatedly) check that all remaining 'pad' fields are
 zero to avoid a repeat of this)

The new data offset must be requested separately for each device.
This allows each to have a different change in the data offset.
This is not likely to be used often but as data_offset can be
set per-device, new_data_offset should be too.

This patch also removes the 'acknowledged' arg to rdev_set_badblocks as
it is never used and never will be.  At the same time we add a new
arg ('in_new') which is currently always zero but will be used more
soon.

When a reshape finishes we will need to update the data_offset
and rdev->sectors.  So provide an exported function to do that.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-21 09:27:00 +10:00
NeilBrown
2c810cddc4 md: allow a reshape operation to be reversed.
Currently a reshape operation always progresses from the start
of the array to the end unless the number of devices is being
reduced, in which case it progressed in the opposite direction.

To reverse a partial reshape which changes the number of devices
you can stop the array and re-assemble with the raid-disks numbers
reversed and it will undo.

However for a reshape that does not change the number of devices
it is not possible to reverse the reshape in the middle - you have to
wait until it completes.

So add a 'reshape_direction' attribute with is either 'forwards' or
'backwards' and can be explicitly set when delta_disks is zero.

This will become more important when we allow the data_offset to
change in a reshape.  Then the explicit statement of what direction is
being used will be more useful.

This can be enabled in raid5 trivially as it already supports
reverse reshape and just needs to use a different trigger to request it.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-05-21 09:27:00 +10:00
majianpeng
c6d2e084c7 md/raid5: Fix a bug about judging if the operation is syncing or replacing
When create a raid5 using assume-clean and echo check or repair to
sync_action.Then component disks did not operated IO but the raid
check/resync faster than normal.
Because the judgement in function analyse_stripe():
		if (do_recovery ||
		    sh->sector >= conf->mddev->recovery_cp)
			s->syncing = 1;
		else
			s->replacing = 1;
When check or repair,the recovery_cp == MaxSectore,so syncing equal zero
not one.

This bug was introduced by commit 9a3e1101b8
    md/raid5:  detect and handle replacements during recovery.
so this patch is suitable for 3.3-stable.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-04-03 15:37:38 +10:00
NeilBrown
18b9837ea0 md/raid5: fix handling of bad blocks during recovery.
1/ We can only treat a known-bad-block like a read-error if we
   have the data that belongs in that block.  So fix that test.

2/ If we cannot recovery a stripe due to insufficient data,
   don't tell "md_done_sync" that the sync failed unless we really
   did fail something.  If we successfully record bad blocks,
   that is success.

Reported-by: "majianpeng" <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-04-03 15:36:17 +10:00
NeilBrown
dafb20fa34 md: tidy up rdev_for_each usage.
md.h has an 'rdev_for_each()' macro for iterating the rdevs in an
mddev.  However it uses the 'safe' version of list_for_each_entry,
and so requires the extra variable, but doesn't include 'safe' in the
name, which is useful documentation.

Consequently some places use this safe version without needing it, and
many use an explicity list_for_each entry.

So:
 - rename rdev_for_each to rdev_for_each_safe
 - create a new rdev_for_each which uses the plain
   list_for_each_entry,
 - use the 'safe' version only where needed, and convert all other
   list_for_each_entry calls to use rdev_for_each.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-03-19 12:46:39 +11:00
NeilBrown
dc10c643e8 md: allow re-add to failed arrays.
When an array is failed (some data inaccessible) then there is no
point attempting to add a spare as it could not possibly be recovered.

However that may be value in re-adding a recently removed device.
e.g. if there is a write-intent-bitmap and it is clear, then access
to the data could be restored by this action.

So don't reject a re-add to a failed array for RAID10 and RAID5 (the
only arrays  types that check for a failed array).

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-03-19 12:46:37 +11:00
majianpeng
41fe75f60b md/raid5: use atomic_dec_return() instead of atomic_dec() and atomic_read().
Signed-off-by: majianpeng <majianpeng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
2012-03-13 11:21:25 +11:00