Convert the simple cases, not all functions provide a way to reach the
fs_info. Also skipped debugging messages (print-tree, integrity
checker and pr_debug) and messages that are printed from possibly
unfinished mount.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
When the inode given to did_overwrite_ref() matches the current progress
and has a reference that collides with the reference of other inode that
has the same number as the current progress, we were always telling our
caller that the inode's reference was overwritten, which is incorrect
because the other inode might be a new inode (different generation number)
in which case we must return false from did_overwrite_ref() so that its
callers don't use an orphanized path for the inode (as it will never be
orphanized, instead it will be unlinked and the new inode created later).
The following test case for fstests reproduces the issue:
seq=`basename $0`
seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
echo "QA output created by $seq"
tmp=/tmp/$$
status=1 # failure is the default!
trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
_cleanup()
{
rm -fr $send_files_dir
rm -f $tmp.*
}
# get standard environment, filters and checks
. ./common/rc
. ./common/filter
# real QA test starts here
_supported_fs btrfs
_supported_os Linux
_require_scratch
_need_to_be_root
send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq
rm -f $seqres.full
rm -fr $send_files_dir
mkdir $send_files_dir
_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
_scratch_mount
# Create our test file with a single extent of 64K.
mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo/bar \
| _filter_xfs_io
_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \
$SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT \
$SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
echo "File digest before being replaced:"
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo/bar | _filter_scratch
# Remove the file and then create a new one in the same location with
# the same name but with different content. This new file ends up
# getting the same inode number as the previous one, because that inode
# number was the highest inode number used by the snapshot's root and
# therefore when attempting to find the a new inode number for the new
# file, we end up reusing the same inode number. This happens because
# currently btrfs uses the highest inode number summed by 1 for the
# first inode created once a snapshot's root is loaded (done at
# fs/btrfs/inode-map.c:btrfs_find_free_objectid in the linux kernel
# tree).
# Having these two different files in the snapshots with the same inode
# number (but different generation numbers) caused the btrfs send code
# to emit an incorrect path for the file when issuing an unlink
# operation because it failed to realize they were different files.
rm -f $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar
$XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0 96K" \
$SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar | _filter_xfs_io
_run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \
$SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro
_run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
_run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \
$SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro -f $send_files_dir/2.snap
echo "File digest in the original filesystem after being replaced:"
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch
# Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify
# we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had.
_scratch_unmount
_scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1
_scratch_mount
_run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap
_run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap
echo "File digest in the new filesystem:"
# Must match the digest from the new file.
md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch
status=0
exit
Reported-by: Martin Raiber <martin@urbackup.org>
Fixes: 8b191a6849 ("Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Neil Horman pointed out a problem where if he did something like this
receive A
snap A B
change B
send -p A B
and then on another box do
recieve A
receive B
the receive B would fail because we use the UUID of A for the clone sources for
B. This makes sense most of the time because normally you are sending from the
original sources, not a received source. However when you use a recieved subvol
its UUID is going to be something completely different, so if you then try to
receive the diff on a different volume it won't find the UUID because the new A
will be something else. The only constant is the received uuid. So instead
check to see if we have received_uuid set on the root, and if so use that as the
clone source, as btrfs receive looks for matches either in received_uuid or
uuid. Thanks,
Reported-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Marc reported a problem where the receiving end of an incremental send
was performing clone operations that failed with -EINVAL. This happened
because, unlike for uncompressed extents, we were not checking if the
source clone offset and length, after summing the data offset, falls
within the source file's boundaries.
So make sure we do such checks when attempting to issue clone operations
for compressed extents.
Problem reproducible with the following steps:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount -o compress /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount -o compress /dev/sdc /mnt2
# Create the file with a single extent of 128K. This creates a metadata file
# extent item with a data start offset of 0 and a logical length of 128K.
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 64K 128K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
# Now rewrite the range 64K to 112K of our file. This will make the inode's
# metadata continue to point to the 128K extent we created before, but now
# with an extent item that points to the extent with a data start offset of
# 112K and a logical length of 16K.
# That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset
# at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 192K.
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 64K 112K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
# Now rewrite the range 180K to 12K. This will make the inode's metadata
# continue to point the the 128K extent we created earlier, with a single
# extent item that points to it with a start offset of 112K and a logical
# length of 4K.
# That metadata file extent item is associated with the logical file offset
# at 176K and covers the logical file range 176K to 180K.
$ xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xcc 180K 12K" -c "fsync" /mnt/foo
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ touch /mnt/bar
# Calls the btrfs clone ioctl.
$ ~/xfstests/src/cloner -s $((176 * 1024)) -d $((176 * 1024)) \
-l $((4 * 1024)) /mnt/foo /mnt/bar
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2
At subvol /mnt/snap1
At subvol snap1
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2
At subvol /mnt/snap2
At snapshot snap2
ERROR: failed to clone extents to bar
Invalid argument
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Tested-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Tested-by: Jan Alexander Steffens (heftig) <jan.steffens@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If a directory inode is orphanized, because some inode previously
processed has a new name that collides with the old name of the current
inode, we need to check if it needs its rename operation delayed too,
as its ancestor-descendent relationship with some other inode might
have been reversed between the parent and send snapshots and therefore
its rename operation needs to happen after that other inode is renamed.
For example, for the following reproducer where this is needed (provided
by Robbie Ko):
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n4
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t6/t7
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t5
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t7
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n4/t2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t4
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t3
$ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2
$ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7
$ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4
$ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5
$ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6
$ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2
$ mv /mnt/data/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n1 /mnt/data/n4
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t2 /mnt/data/n4/n1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7/t3 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7/t4 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t6
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/t3
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2/n2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/n1/t2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive /mnt2
ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory
Where the parent snapshot directory hierarchy is the following:
. (ino 256)
|-- data/ (ino 257)
|-- n4/ (ino 260)
|-- t2/ (ino 265)
|-- t7/ (ino 264)
|-- t4/ (ino 266)
|-- t5/ (ino 263)
|-- t6/ (ino 261)
|-- n1/ (ino 258)
|-- n2/ (ino 259)
|-- t7/ (ino 262)
|-- t3/ (ino 267)
And the send snapshot's directory hierarchy is the following:
. (ino 256)
|-- data/ (ino 257)
|-- n4/ (ino 260)
|-- n1/ (ino 258)
|-- t2/ (ino 265)
|-- n2/ (ino 259)
|-- t3/ (ino 267)
| |-- t7 (ino 264)
|
|-- t6/ (ino 261)
| |-- t4/ (ino 266)
| |-- t5/ (ino 263)
|
|-- t7/ (ino 262)
While processing inode 262 we orphanize inode 264 and later attempt
to rename inode 264 to its new name/location, which resulted in building
an incorrect destination path string for the rename operation with the
value "data/n4/t2/t7/t4/t5/t6/n2/t7/t3/t7". This rename operation must
have been done only after inode 267 is processed and renamed, as the
ancestor-descendent relationship between inodes 264 and 267 was reversed
between both snapshots, because otherwise it results in an infinite loop
when building the path string for inode 264 when we are processing an
inode with a number larger than 264. That loop is the following:
start inode 264, send progress of 265 for example
parent of 264 -> 267
parent of 267 -> 262
parent of 262 -> 259
parent of 259 -> 261
parent of 261 -> 263
parent of 263 -> 266
parent of 266 -> 264
|--> back to first iteration while current path string length
is <= PATH_MAX, and fail with -ENOMEM otherwise
So fix this by making the check if we need to delay a directory rename
regardless of the current inode having been orphanized or not.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Thanks to Robbie Ko for providing a reproducer for this problem.
Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Even though we delay the rename of directories when they become
descendents of other directories that were also renamed in the send
root to prevent infinite path build loops, we were doing it in cases
where this was not needed and was actually harmful resulting in
infinite path build loops as we ended up with a circular dependency
of delayed directory renames.
Consider the following reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
$ mkdir /mnt/data
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n1
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n4
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t6
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t7
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t5/t7
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/t4
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/t1/t3
$ mkdir /mnt/data/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/t1 /mnt/data/p1
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2
$ mv /mnt/data/t4 /mnt/data/p1/p2/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t5
$ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2
$ mv /mnt/data/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/t7
$ mv /mnt/data/t2 /mnt/data/n4/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/t6 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t5
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t3/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/n1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/n1
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1/t7/p1/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2/t1 /mnt/data/n4/
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2/n2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3/t1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t3 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/t7
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5/p2/p1 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/t1/t3/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/t5
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t5 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/t5/p2 /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/t1/n2/p1/p2/p1/p2/t7 /mnt/data/n4/t1/t7
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 | btrfs receive /mnt2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 | btrfs receive -vv /mnt2
ERROR: send ioctl failed with -12: Cannot allocate memory
This reproducer resulted in an infinite path build loop when building the
path for inode 266 because the following circular dependency of delayed
directory renames was created:
ino 272 <- ino 261 <- ino 259 <- ino 268 <- ino 267 <- ino 261
Where the notation "X <- Y" means the rename of inode X is delayed by the
rename of inode Y (X will be renamed after Y is renamed). This resulted
in an infinite path build loop of inode 266 because that inode has inode
261 as an ancestor in the send root and inode 261 is in the circular
dependency of delayed renames listed above.
Fix this by not delaying the rename of a directory inode if an ancestor of
the inode in the send root, which has a delayed rename operation, is not
also a descendent of the inode in the parent root.
Thanks to Robbie Ko for sending the reproducer example.
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
The logic to detect path loops when attempting to apply a pending
directory rename, introduced in commit
f959492fc1 (Btrfs: send, fix more issues related to directory renames)
is no longer needed, and the respective fstests test case for that commit,
btrfs/045, now passes without this code (as well as all the other test
cases for send/receive).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If a directory's reference ends up being orphanized, because the inode
currently being processed has a new path that matches that directory's
path, make sure we evict the name of the directory from the name cache.
This is because there might be descendent inodes (either directories or
regular files) that will be orphanized later too, and therefore the
orphan name of the ancestor must be used, otherwise we send issue rename
operations with a wrong path in the send stream.
Reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2
$ mkdir /mnt/data/n4
$ mkdir -p /mnt/data/p1/p2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ mv /mnt/data/p1/p2 /mnt/data
$ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1/p2 /mnt/data/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/p2 /mnt/data/n1/n2/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/n1/n2 /mnt/data/p1
$ mv /mnt/data/p1 /mnt/data/n4
$ mv /mnt/data/n4/p1/n2/p1 /mnt/data
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send
ERROR: rename data/p1/p2 -> data/n4/p1/p2 failed. no such file or directory
Directories data/p1 (inode 263) and data/p1/p2 (inode 264) in the parent
snapshot are both orphanized during the incremental send, and as soon as
data/p1 is orphanized, we must make sure that when orphanizing data/p1/p2
we use a source path of o263-6-o/p2 for the rename operation instead of
the old path data/p1/p2 (the one before the orphanization of inode 263).
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Robbie Ko <robbieko@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If the clone root was not readonly or the dead flag was set on it, we were
leaving without decrementing the root's send_progress counter (and before
we just incremented it). If a concurrent snapshot deletion was in progress
and ended up being aborted, it would be impossible to later attempt to
delete again the snapshot, since the root's send_in_progress counter could
never go back to 0.
We were also setting clone_sources_to_rollback to i + 1 too early - if we
bailed out because the clone root we got is not readonly or flagged as dead
we ended up later derreferencing a null pointer because we didn't assign
the clone root to sctx->clone_roots[i].root:
for (i = 0; sctx && i < clone_sources_to_rollback; i++)
btrfs_root_dec_send_in_progress(
sctx->clone_roots[i].root);
So just don't increment the send_in_progress counter if the root is readonly
or flagged as dead.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
After we locked the root's root item, a concurrent snapshot deletion
call might have set the dead flag on it. So check if the dead flag
is set and abort if it is, just like we do for the parent root.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
There's one more case where we can't issue a rename operation for a
directory as soon as we process it. We used to delay directory renames
only if they have some ancestor directory with a higher inode number
that got renamed too, but there's another case where we need to delay
the rename too - when a directory A is renamed to the old name of a
directory B but that directory B has its rename delayed because it
has now (in the send root) an ancestor with a higher inode number that
was renamed. If we don't delay the directory rename in this case, the
receiving end of the send stream will attempt to rename A to the old
name of B before B got renamed to its new name, which results in a
"directory not empty" error. So fix this by delaying directory renames
for this case too.
Steps to reproduce:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb
$ mount /dev/sdb /mnt
$ mkdir /mnt/a
$ mkdir /mnt/b
$ mkdir /mnt/c
$ touch /mnt/a/file
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ mv /mnt/c /mnt/x
$ mv /mnt/a /mnt/x/y
$ mv /mnt/b /mnt/a
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/1.send
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/2.send
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
$ mount /dev/sdc /mnt2
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.send
ERROR: rename b -> a failed. Directory not empty
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Ames Cornish <ames@cornishes.net>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Move the logic from the snapshot creation ioctl into send. This avoids
doing the transaction commit if send isn't used, and ensures that if
a crash/reboot happens after the transaction commit that created the
snapshot and before the transaction commit that switched the commit
root, send will not get a commit root that differs from the main root
(that has orphan items).
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If between two snapshots we rename an existing directory named X to Y and
make it a child (direct or not) of a new inode named X, we were delaying
the move/rename of the former directory unnecessarily, which would result
in attempting to rename the new directory from its orphan name to name X
prematurely.
Minimal reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdd
$ mount /dev/vdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/merlin/RC/OSD/Source
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
$ mkdir /mnt/OSD
$ mv /mnt/merlin/RC/OSD /mnt/OSD/OSD-Plane_788
$ mv /mnt/OSD /mnt/merlin/RC
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2
$ btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/2.snap
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/vdc
$ mount /dev/vdc /mnt2
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/1.snap
$ btrfs receive /mnt2 -f /tmp/2.snap
The second receive (from an incremental send) failed with the following
error message: "rename o261-7-0 -> merlin/RC/OSD failed".
This is a regression introduced in the 3.16 kernel.
A test case for xfstests follows.
Reported-by: Marc Merlin <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Maximum xattr size can be up to nearly the leaf size. For an fs with a
leaf size larger than the page size, using kmalloc requires allocating
multiple pages that are contiguous, which might not be possible if
there's heavy memory fragmentation. Therefore fallback to vmalloc if
we fail to allocate with kmalloc. Also start with a smaller buffer size,
since xattr values typically are smaller than a page.
Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Fix the following sparse warning:
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces)
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51: expected char const [noderef] <asn:1>*<noident>
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51: got char *
We can safely use (const char __user *) with set_fs(KERNEL_DS)
__force added to avoid sparse-all warning:
fs/btrfs/send.c:518:40: warning: cast adds address space to expression (<asn:1>)
Signed-off-by: Fabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be>
Reviewed-by: Zach Brown <zab@zabbo.net>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We were limiting the sum of the xattr name and value lengths to PATH_MAX,
which is not correct, specially on filesystems created with btrfs-progs
v3.12 or higher, where the default leaf size is max(16384, PAGE_SIZE), or
systems with page sizes larger than 4096 bytes.
Xattrs have their own specific maximum name and value lengths, which depend
on the leaf size, therefore use these limits to be able to send xattrs with
sizes larger than PATH_MAX.
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If we are doing an incremental send and the base snapshot has a
directory with name X that doesn't exist anymore in the second
snapshot and a new subvolume/snapshot exists in the second snapshot
that has the same name as the directory (name X), the incremental
send would fail with -ENOENT error. This is because it attempts
to lookup for an inode with a number matching the objectid of a
root, which doesn't exist.
Steps to reproduce:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
mount /dev/sdd /mnt
mkdir /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
rmdir /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume create /mnt/testdir
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap2
btrfs send -p /mnt/mysnap1 /mnt/mysnap2 -f /tmp/send.data
A test case for xfstests follows.
Reported-by: Robert White <rwhite@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
I've noticed an extra line after "use no compression", but search
revealed much more in messages of more critical levels and rare errors.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
This is a continuation of the previous changes titled:
Btrfs: fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
Btrfs: part 2, fix incremental send's decision to delay a dir move/rename
There's a few more cases where a directory rename/move must be delayed which was
previously overlooked. If our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than
ours and it doesn't have a delayed rename/move operation associated to it, it
doesn't mean there isn't any non-direct ancestor of our current inode that needs
to be renamed/moved before our current inode (i.e. with a higher inode number
than ours).
So we can't stop the search if our immediate ancestor has a lower inode number than
ours, we need to navigate the directory hierarchy upwards until we hit the root or:
1) find an ancestor with an higher inode number that was renamed/moved in the send
root too (or already has a pending rename/move registered);
2) find an ancestor that is a new directory (higher inode number than ours and
exists only in the send root).
Reproducer for case 1)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/x
$ mkdir /mnt/a/y
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
Simple reproducer for case 2)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/b2
$ mkdir /mnt/a/e
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/c/b2 /mnt/a/e/b3
$ mkdir /mnt/a/e/b3/f
$ mkdir /mnt/a/h
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/e/b3/f/c2
$ mv /mnt/a/e /mnt/a/h/e2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
Another simple reproducer for case 2)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c/e
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/d/f
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/g
$ mv /mnt/a/c/e /mnt/a/b/g/e2
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/b/d/f/c2
$ mv /mnt/a/b/d/f /mnt/a/b/g/e2/f2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
More complex reproducer for case 2)
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
$ mkdir /mnt/a/c/d/f
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/c/d/2b
$ mkdir /mnt/a/x
$ mkdir /mnt/a/y
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/x /mnt/a/y
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d/2b/e /mnt/a/c/d/2b/2e
$ mv /mnt/a/c/d /mnt/a/h/2d
$ mv /mnt/a/c /mnt/a/h/2d/2b/2c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
For both cases the incremental send would enter an infinite loop when building
path strings.
While solving these cases, this change also re-implements the code to detect
when directory moves/renames should be delayed. Instead of dealing with several
specific cases separately, it's now more generic handling all cases with a simple
detection algorithm and if when applying a delayed move/rename there's a path loop
detected, it further delays the move/rename registering a new ancestor inode as
the dependency inode (so our rename happens after that ancestor is renamed).
Tests for these cases is being added to xfstests too.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If we have directories with a pending move/rename operation, we must take into
account any orphan directories that got created before executing the pending
move/rename. Those orphan directories are directories with an inode number higher
then the current send progress and that don't exist in the parent snapshot, they
are created before current progress reaches their inode number, with a generated
name of the form oN-M-I and at the root of the filesystem tree, and later when
progress matches their inode number, moved/renamed to their final location.
Reproducer:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/b/e/CC
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/e/CC/d/f
$ mkdir /mnt/a/g
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mkdir /mnt/a/g/h
$ mv /mnt/a/b/e /mnt/a/g/h/EE
$ mv /mnt/a/g/h/EE/CC/d /mnt/a/g/h/EE/DD
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second receive command failed with the following error:
ERROR: rename a/b/e/CC/d -> o264-7-0/EE/DD failed. No such file or directory
A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Regardless of whether the caller is interested or not in knowing the inode's
generation (dir_gen != NULL), get_first_ref always does a btree lookup to get
the inode item. Avoid this useless lookup if dir_gen parameter is NULL (which
is in some cases).
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
The patch "Btrfs: fix protection between send and root deletion"
(18f687d538) does not actually prevent to delete the snapshot
and just takes care during background cleaning, but this seems rather
user unfriendly, this patch implements the idea presented in
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg30813.html
- add an internal root_item flag to denote a dead root
- check if the send_in_progress is set and refuse to delete, otherwise
set the flag and proceed
- check the flag in send similar to the btrfs_root_readonly checks, for
all involved roots
The root lookup in send via btrfs_read_fs_root_no_name will check if the
root is really dead or not. If it is, ENOENT, aborted send. If it's
alive, it's protected by send_in_progress, send can continue.
CC: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
CC: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
If a path has more than 230 characters, we allocate a new buffer to
use for the path, but we were forgotting to copy the contents of the
previous buffer into the new one, which has random content from the
kmalloc call.
Test:
mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
mount /dev/sdd /mnt
TEST_PATH="/mnt/fdmanana/.config/google-chrome-mysetup/Default/Pepper_Data/Shockwave_Flash/WritableRoot/#SharedObjects/JSHJ4ZKN/s.wsj.net/[[IMPORT]]/players.edgesuite.net/flash/plugins/osmf/advanced-streaming-plugin/v2.7/osmf1.6/Ak#"
mkdir -p $TEST_PATH
echo "hello world" > $TEST_PATH/amaiAdvancedStreamingPlugin.txt
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/mysnap1
btrfs send /mnt/mysnap1 -f /tmp/1.snap
A test for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Cc: Marc Merlin <marc@merlins.org>
Tested-by: Marc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
fs_path_ensure_buf is used to make sure our path buffers for
send are big enough for the path names as we construct them.
The buffer size is limited to 32K by the length field in
the struct.
But bugs in the path construction can end up trying to build
a huge buffer, and we'll do invalid memmmoves when the
buffer length field wraps.
This patch is step one, preventing the overflows.
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
There's no point building the path string in each iteration of the
send_hole loop, as it produces always the same string.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We currently rely too heavily on roots being read-only to save us from just
accessing root->commit_root. We can easily balance blocks out from underneath a
read only root, so to save us from getting screwed make sure we only access
root->commit_root under the commit root sem. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Lets try this again. We can deadlock the box if we send on a box and try to
write onto the same fs with the app that is trying to listen to the send pipe.
This is because the writer could get stuck waiting for a transaction commit
which is being blocked by the send. So fix this by making sure looking at the
commit roots is always going to be consistent. We do this by keeping track of
which roots need to have their commit roots swapped during commit, and then
taking the commit_root_sem and swapping them all at once. Then make sure we
take a read lock on the commit_root_sem in cases where we search the commit root
to make sure we're always looking at a consistent view of the commit roots.
Previously we had problems with this because we would swap a fs tree commit root
and then swap the extent tree commit root independently which would cause the
backref walking code to screw up sometimes. With this patch we no longer
deadlock and pass all the weird send/receive corner cases. Thanks,
Reportedy-by: Hugo Mills <hugo@carfax.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
So I have an awful exercise script that will run snapshot, balance and
send/receive in parallel. This sometimes would crash spectacularly and when it
came back up the fs would be completely hosed. Turns out this is because of a
bad interaction of balance and send/receive. Send will hold onto its entire
path for the whole send, but its blocks could get relocated out from underneath
it, and because it doesn't old tree locks theres nothing to keep this from
happening. So it will go to read in a slot with an old transid, and we could
have re-allocated this block for something else and it could have a completely
different transid. But because we think it is invalid we clear uptodate and
re-read in the block. If we do this before we actually write out the new block
we could write back stale data to the fs, and boom we're screwed.
Now we definitely need to fix this disconnect between send and balance, but we
really really need to not allow ourselves to accidently read in stale data over
new data. So make sure we check if the extent buffer is not under io before
clearing uptodate, this will kick back EIO to the caller instead of reading in
stale data and keep us from corrupting the fs. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
For an incremental send, fix the process of determining whether the directory
inode we're currently processing needs to have its move/rename operation delayed.
We were ignoring the fact that if the inode's new immediate ancestor has a higher
inode number than ours but wasn't renamed/moved, we might still need to delay our
move/rename, because some other ancestor directory higher in the hierarchy might
have an inode number higher than ours *and* was renamed/moved too - in this case
we have to wait for rename/move of that ancestor to happen before our current
directory's rename/move operation.
Simple steps to reproduce this issue:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2
$ mkdir /mnt/a/Z
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3/x4/x5
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2/x3 /mnt/a/Z/X33
$ mv /mnt/a/x1/x2 /mnt/a/Z/X33/x4/x5/X22
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when
building the path string for directory Z after its references are processed.
A more complex scenario:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir -p /mnt/a/b/c/d
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/e
$ mkdir /mnt/a/b/c/d/f
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/a/b/c/d/f/E2
$ mkdir /mmt/a/b/c/g
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c/d /mnt/a/b/D2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mkdir /mnt/a/o
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c/g /mnt/a/b/D2/f/G2
$ mv /mnt/a/b/D2 /mnt/a/b/dd
$ mv /mnt/a/b/c /mnt/a/C2
$ mv /mnt/a/b/dd/f /mnt/a/o/FF
$ mv /mnt/a/b /mnt/a/o/FF/E2/BB
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
It's possible to change the parent/child relationship between directories
in such a way that if a child directory has a higher inode number than
its parent, it doesn't necessarily means the child rename/move operation
can be performed immediately. The parent migth have its own rename/move
operation delayed, therefore in this case the child needs to have its
rename/move operation delayed too, and be performed after its new parent's
rename/move.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
$ umount /mnt
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdd
$ mount /dev/sdd /mnt
$ mkdir /mnt/A
$ mkdir /mnt/B
$ mkdir /mnt/C
$ mv /mnt/C /mnt/A
$ mv /mnt/B /mnt/A/C
$ mkdir /mnt/A/C/D
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/A/C/D /mnt/A/D2
$ mv /mnt/A/C/B /mnt/A/D2/B2
$ mv /mnt/A/C /mnt/A/D2/B2/C2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/snap1 /mnt/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
The incremental send caused the kernel code to enter an infinite loop when
building the path string for directory C after its references are processed.
The necessary conditions here are that C has an inode number higher than both
A and B, and B as an higher inode number higher than A, and D has the highest
inode number, that is:
inode_number(A) < inode_number(B) < inode_number(C) < inode_number(D)
The same issue could happen if after the first snapshot there's any number
of intermediary parent directories between A2 and B2, and between B2 and C2.
A test case for xfstests follows, covering this simple case and more advanced
ones, with files and hard links created inside the directories.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
No need to search in the send tree for the generation number of the inode,
we already have it in the recorded_ref structure passed to us.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Btrfs send reads data from disk and then writes to a stream via pipe or
a file via flush.
Currently we're going to read each page a time, so every page results
in a disk read, which is not friendly to disks, esp. HDD. Given that,
the performance can be gained by adding readahead for those pages.
Here is a quick test:
$ btrfs subvolume create send
$ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 1G" send/foobar
$ btrfs subvolume snap -r send ro
$ time "btrfs send ro -f /dev/null"
w/o w
real 1m37.527s 0m9.097s
user 0m0.122s 0m0.086s
sys 0m53.191s 0m12.857s
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
This has no functional change, only picks out the same part of two functions,
and makes it shared.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
When we're finishing processing of an inode, if we're dealing with a
directory inode that has a pending move/rename operation, we don't
need to send a utimes update instruction to the send stream, as we'll
do it later after doing the move/rename operation. Therefore we save
some time here building paths and doing btree lookups.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
It is really unnecessary to search tree again for @gen, @mode and @rdev
in the case of REG inodes' creation, as we've got btrfs_inode_item in sctx,
and @gen, @mode and @rdev can easily be fetched.
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
In "btrfs: send: lower memory requirements in common case" the code to
save the old_buf_len was incorrectly moved to a wrong place and broke
the original logic.
Reported-by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
When doing an incremental send, if we had a directory pending a move/rename
operation and none of its parents, except for the immediate parent, were
pending a move/rename, after processing the directory's references, we would
be issuing utimes, chown and chmod intructions against am outdated path - a
path which matched the one in the parent root.
This change also simplifies a bit the code that deals with building a path
for a directory which has a move/rename operation delayed.
Steps to reproduce:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e
$ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f
$ chmod 0777 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/e /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2
$ chmod 0700 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/f2/e2
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
$ umount /mnt/btrfs
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second btrfs receive command failed with:
ERROR: chmod a/b/c/d/e failed. No such file or directory
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
The incremental send algorithm assumed that it was possible to issue
a directory remove (rmdir) if the the inode number it was currently
processing was greater than (or equal) to any inode that referenced
the directory's inode. This wasn't a valid assumption because any such
inode might be a child directory that is pending a move/rename operation,
because it was moved into a directory that has a higher inode number and
was moved/renamed too - in other words, the case the following commit
addressed:
9f03740a95
(Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send)
This made an incremental send issue an rmdir operation before the
target directory was actually empty, which made btrfs receive fail.
Therefore it needs to wait for all pending child directory inodes to
be moved/renamed before sending an rmdir operation.
Simple steps to reproduce this issue:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x
$ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/y /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/YY
$ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
$ umount /mnt/btrfs
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second btrfs receive command failed with:
ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. Directory not empty
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
When doing an incremental send, if we delete a directory that has N > 1
hardlinks for the same file and that file has the highest inode number
inside the directory contents, an incremental send would send N times an
rmdir operation against the directory. This made the btrfs receive command
fail on the second rmdir instruction, as the target directory didn't exist
anymore.
Steps to reproduce the issue:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
$ echo 'ola mundo' > /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt
$ ln /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/bar.txt
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/foo.txt
$ rm -f /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/bar.txt
$ rmdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
$ umount /mnt/btrfs
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second btrfs receive command failed with:
ERROR: rmdir o259-6-0 failed. No such file or directory
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
This fixes yet one more case not caught by the commit titled:
Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send
In this case, even before the initial full send, we have a directory
which is a child of a directory with a higher inode number. Then we
perform the initial send, and after we rename both the child and the
parent, without moving them around. After doing these 2 renames, an
incremental send sent a rename instruction for the child directory
which contained an invalid "from" path (referenced the parent's old
name, not the new one), which made the btrfs receive command fail.
Steps to reproduce:
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b
$ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/d
$ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
$ btrfs send /mnt/btrfs/snap1 -f /tmp/base.send
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x
$ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x/y
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
$ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 -f /tmp/incremental.send
$ umout /mnt/btrfs
$ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
$ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/base.send
$ btrfs receive /mnt/btrfs -f /tmp/incremental.send
The second btrfs receive command failed with:
"ERROR: rename a/b/c/d -> a/b/x/y failed. No such file or directory"
A test case for xfstests follows.
Signed-off-by: Filipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
