2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-16 09:13:55 +08:00
Commit Graph

651 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeff Mahoney
538042801a btrfs: avoid NULL deref in btrfs_reserve_extent with DEBUG_ENOSPC
__find_space_info can return NULL but we don't check it before calling
 dump_space_info().

Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
2012-03-22 01:45:32 +01:00
Chris Mason
e77266e4c4 Btrfs: fix compiler warnings on 32 bit systems
The enospc tracing code added some interesting uses of
u64 pointer casts.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-02-24 10:39:05 -05:00
Liu Bo
5500cdbe14 Btrfs: increase the global block reserve estimates
When doing IO with large amounts of data fragmentation, the global block
reserve calulations are too low.  This increases them to avoid
ENOSPC crashes.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-02-23 10:49:04 -05:00
Liu Bo
d9b0218f6c Btrfs: fix a bug on overcommit stuff
When overcommitting, we should check the sum of pinned space and
bytes for delayed item.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
2012-02-16 17:23:18 +01:00
Liu Bo
2cac13e41b Btrfs: fix trim 0 bytes after a device delete
A user reported a bug of btrfs's trim, that is we will trim 0 bytes
after a device delete.

The reproducer:

$ mkfs.btrfs disk1
$ mkfs.btrfs disk2
$ mount disk1 /mnt
$ fstrim -v /mnt
$ btrfs device add disk2 /mnt
$ btrfs device del disk1 /mnt
$ fstrim -v /mnt

This is because after we delete the device, the block group may start from
a non-zero place, which will confuse trim to discard nothing.

Reported-by: Lutz Euler <lutz.euler@freenet.de>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
2012-02-15 16:40:23 +01:00
Miao Xie
9e622d6bea Btrfs: fix enospc error caused by wrong checks of the chunk
When we did sysbench test for inline files, enospc error happened easily though
there was lots of free disk space which could be allocated for new chunks.

Reproduce steps:
 # mkfs.btrfs -b $((2 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024)) <test partition>
 # mount <test partition> /mnt
 # ulimit -n 102400
 # cd /mnt
 # sysbench --num-threads=1 --test=fileio --file-num=81920 \
 > --file-total-size=80M --file-block-size=1K --file-io-mode=sync \
 > --file-test-mode=seqwr prepare
 # sysbench --num-threads=1 --test=fileio --file-num=81920 \
 > --file-total-size=80M --file-block-size=1K --file-io-mode=sync \
 > --file-test-mode=seqwr run
 <soon later, BUG_ON() was triggered by enospc error>

The reason of this bug is:
Now, we can reserve space which is larger than the free space in the chunks if
we have enough free disk space which can be used for new chunks. By this way,
the space allocator should allocate a new chunk by force if there is no free
space in the free space cache. But there are two wrong checks which break this
operation.

One is
	if (ret == -ENOSPC && num_bytes > min_alloc_size)
in btrfs_reserve_extent(), it is wrong, we should try to allocate a new chunk
even we fail to allocate free space by minimum allocable size.

The other is
	if (space_info->force_alloc)
		force = space_info->force_alloc;
in do_chunk_alloc(). It makes the allocator ignore CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE If someone
sets ->force_alloc to CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED, and makes the enospc error happen.

Fix these two wrong checks. Especially the second one, we fix it by changing
the value of CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED and CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE, and make
CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE greater than CHUNK_ALLOC_LIMITED since CHUNK_ALLOC_FORCE has
higher priority. And if the value which is passed in by the caller is greater
than ->force_alloc, use the passed value.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-01-26 15:01:12 -05:00
Chris Mason
96bdc7dc61 Btrfs: use larger system chunks
system chunks by default are very small.  This makes them slightly
larger and also fixes the conditional checks to make sure we don't
allocate a billion of them at once.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-01-16 15:38:24 -05:00
Josef Bacik
f248679e86 Btrfs: add a delalloc mutex to inodes for delalloc reservations
I was using i_mutex for this, but we're getting bogus lockdep warnings by doing
that and theres no real way to get rid of those, so just stop using i_mutex to
protect delalloc metadata reservations and use a delalloc mutex instead.  This
shouldn't be contended often at all, only if you are writing and mmap writing to
the file at the same time.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2012-01-16 15:29:43 -05:00
Josef Bacik
8c2a3ca20f Btrfs: space leak tracepoints
This in addition to a script in my btrfs-tracing tree will help track down space
leaks when we're getting space left over in block groups on umount.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2012-01-16 15:29:43 -05:00
Josef Bacik
3f7de037fb Btrfs: add allocator tracepoints
I used these tracepoints when figuring out what the cluster stuff was doing, so
add them to mainline in case we need to profile this stuff again.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2012-01-16 15:29:42 -05:00
Chris Mason
9785dbdf26 Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://git.jan-o-sch.net/btrfs-unstable into integration 2012-01-16 15:26:31 -05:00
Chris Mason
d756bd2d93 Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://repo.or.cz/linux-btrfs-devel into integration
Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/volumes.c

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-01-16 15:26:17 -05:00
Chris Mason
27263e2832 Merge branch 'restriper' of git://github.com/idryomov/btrfs-unstable into integration 2012-01-16 15:26:02 -05:00
Ilya Dryomov
e4d8ec0f65 Btrfs: implement online profile changing
Profile changing is done by launching a balance with
BTRFS_BALANCE_CONVERT bits set and target fields of respective
btrfs_balance_args structs initialized.  Profile reducing code in this
case will pick restriper's target profile if it's available instead of
doing a blind reduce.  If target profile is not yet available it goes
back to a plain reduce.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2012-01-16 22:04:48 +02:00
Ilya Dryomov
70922617b0 Btrfs: do not reduce profile in do_chunk_alloc()
Every caller of do_chunk_alloc() feeds it the reduced allocation
profile, so stop trying to reduce it one more time.  Instead check the
validity of the passed profile.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2012-01-16 22:04:48 +02:00
Ilya Dryomov
10ea00f55a Btrfs: make avail_*_alloc_bits fields dynamic
Currently when new chunks are created respective avail_alloc_bits field
is updated to reflect profiles of all chunks present in the system.
However when chunks are removed profile bits are never cleared.

This patch clears profile bit of respective avail_alloc_bits field when
the last chunk with that profile is removed.  Restriper needs this to
properly operate when "downgrading".

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2012-01-16 22:04:47 +02:00
Ilya Dryomov
a46d11a8b0 Btrfs: add BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE bit
Right now on-disk BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_* profile bits are used for
avail_{data,metadata,system}_alloc_bits fields, which gather info about
available allocation profiles in the FS.  When chunk is created or read
from disk, its profile is OR'ed with the corresponding avail_alloc_bits
field.  Since SINGLE is denoted by 0 in the on-disk format, currently
there is no way to tell when such chunks become avaialble.  Restriper
needs that information, so add a separate bit for SINGLE profile.

This bit is going to be in-memory only, it should never be written out
to disk, so it's not a disk format change.  However to avoid remappings
in future, reserve corresponding on-disk bit.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2012-01-16 22:04:47 +02:00
Ilya Dryomov
52ba692972 Btrfs: introduce masks for chunk type and profile
Chunk's type and profile are encoded in u64 flags field.  Introduce
masks to easily access them.  Also fix the type of BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_*
constants, it should be ULL.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2012-01-16 22:04:47 +02:00
Ilya Dryomov
6fef8df1dc Btrfs: get rid of *_alloc_profile fields
{data,metadata,system}_alloc_profile fields have been unused for a long
time now.  Get rid of them.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2012-01-16 22:04:47 +02:00
Li Zefan
c7c144db53 Btrfs: update global block_rsv when creating a new block group
A bug was triggered while using seed device:

    # mkfs.btrfs /dev/loop1
    # btrfstune -S 1 /dev/loop1
    # mount -o /dev/loop1 /mnt
    # btrfs dev add /dev/loop2 /mnt

btrfs: block rsv returned -28
------------[ cut here ]------------
WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5969 btrfs_alloc_free_block+0x166/0x396 [btrfs]()
...
Call Trace:
...
[<f7b7c31c>] btrfs_cow_block+0x101/0x147 [btrfs]
[<f7b7eaa6>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1b8/0x55f [btrfs]
[<f7b7f844>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x42/0x7f [btrfs]
[<f7b7f8c1>] btrfs_insert_item+0x40/0x7e [btrfs]
[<f7b8ac02>] btrfs_make_block_group+0x243/0x2aa [btrfs]
[<f7bb3f53>] __btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x672/0x70e [btrfs]
[<f7bb41ff>] init_first_rw_device+0x77/0x13c [btrfs]
[<f7bb5a62>] btrfs_init_new_device+0x664/0x9fd [btrfs]
[<f7bbb65a>] btrfs_ioctl+0x694/0xdbe [btrfs]
[<c04f55f7>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x496/0x4cc
[<c04f5660>] sys_ioctl+0x33/0x4f
[<c07b9edf>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x38
---[ end trace 906adac595facc7d ]---

Since seed device is readonly, there's no usable space in the filesystem.
Afterwards we add a sprout device to it, and the kernel creates a METADATA
block group and a SYSTEM block group where comes free space we can reserve,
but we still get revervation failure because the global block_rsv hasn't
been updated accordingly.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
2012-01-11 10:26:52 +08:00
Li Zefan
125ccb0ae6 Btrfs: don't pass a trans handle unnecessarily in volumes.c
Some functions never use the transaction handle passed to them.

Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
2012-01-11 10:26:42 +08:00
Alexandre Oliva
fc7c1077ce Btrfs: don't set up allocation result twice
We store the allocation start and length twice in ins, once right
after the other, but with intervening calls that may prevent the
duplicate from being optimized out by the compiler.  Remove one of the
assignments.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-01-07 19:15:14 -05:00
Alexandre Oliva
a5f6f719a5 Btrfs: test free space only for unclustered allocation
Since the clustered allocation may be taking extents from a different
block group, there's no point in spin-locking and testing the current
block group free space before attempting to allocate space from a
cluster, even more so when we might refrain from even trying the
cluster in the current block group because, after the cluster was set
up, not enough free space remained.  Furthermore, cluster creation
attempts fail fast when the block group doesn't have enough free
space, so the test was completely superfluous.

I've move the free space test past the cluster allocation attempt,
where it is more useful, and arranged for a cluster in the current
block group to be released before trying an unclustered allocation,
when we reach the LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE stage, so that the free space in
the cluster stands a chance of being combined with additional free
space in the block group so as to succeed in the allocation attempt.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-01-06 15:48:21 -05:00
Chris Mason
cf1d72c9ce Btrfs: lower the bar for chunk allocation
The chunk allocation code has tried to keep a pretty tight lid on creating new
metadata chunks.  This is partially because in the past the reservation
code didn't give us an accurate idea of how much space was being used.

The new code is much more accurate, so we're able to get rid of some of these
checks.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-01-06 15:41:34 -05:00
Chris Mason
203bf287cb Btrfs: run chunk allocations while we do delayed refs
Btrfs tries to batch extent allocation tree changes to improve performance
and reduce metadata trashing.  But it doesn't allocate new metadata chunks
while it is doing allocations for the extent allocation tree.

This commit changes the delayed refence code to do chunk allocations if we're
getting low on room.  It prevents crashes and improves performance.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2012-01-06 15:23:57 -05:00
Jan Schmidt
a168650c08 Btrfs: add waitqueue instead of doing busy waiting for more delayed refs
Now that we may be holding back delayed refs for a limited period, we
might end up having no runnable delayed refs. Without this commit, we'd
do busy waiting in that thread until another (runnable) ref arives.
Instead, we're detecting this situation and use a waitqueue, such that
we only try to run more refs after
	a) another runnable ref was added  or
	b) delayed refs are no longer held back

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2012-01-04 16:12:48 +01:00
Arne Jansen
d1270cd91f Btrfs: put back delayed refs that are too new
When processing a delayed ref, first check if there are still old refs in
the process of being added. If so, put this ref back to the tree. To avoid
looping on this ref, choose a newer one in the next loop.
btrfs_find_ref_cluster has to take care of that.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2012-01-04 16:12:45 +01:00
Arne Jansen
66d7e7f09f Btrfs: mark delayed refs as for cow
Add a for_cow parameter to add_delayed_*_ref and pass the appropriate value
from every call site. The for_cow parameter will later on be used to
determine if a ref will change anything with respect to qgroups.

Delayed refs coming from relocation are always counted as for_cow, as they
don't change subvol quota.

Also pass in the fs_info for later use.

btrfs_find_all_roots() will use this as an optimization, as changes that are
for_cow will not change anything with respect to which root points to a
certain leaf. Thus, we don't need to add the current sequence number to
those delayed refs.

Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2011-12-22 16:22:27 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
c9a7fe9672 Merge branches 'for-linus' and 'for-linus-3.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  Btrfs: unplug every once and a while
  Btrfs: deal with NULL srv_rsv in the delalloc inode reservation code
  Btrfs: only set cache_generation if we setup the block group
  Btrfs: don't panic if orphan item already exists
  Btrfs: fix leaked space in truncate
  Btrfs: fix how we do delalloc reservations and how we free reservations on error
  Btrfs: deal with enospc from dirtying inodes properly
  Btrfs: fix num_workers_starting bug and other bugs in async thread
  BTRFS: Establish i_ops before calling d_instantiate
  Btrfs: add a cond_resched() into the worker loop
  Btrfs: fix ctime update of on-disk inode
  btrfs: keep orphans for subvolume deletion
  Btrfs: fix inaccurate available space on raid0 profile
  Btrfs: fix wrong disk space information of the files
  Btrfs: fix wrong i_size when truncating a file to a larger size
  Btrfs: fix btrfs_end_bio to deal with write errors to a single mirror

* 'for-linus-3.2' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  btrfs: lower the dirty balance poll interval
2011-12-16 12:15:50 -08:00
Josef Bacik
e65cbb94e0 Btrfs: only set cache_generation if we setup the block group
A user reported a problem booting into a new kernel with the old format inodes.
He was panicing in cow_file_range while writing out the inode cache.  This is
because if the block group is not cached we'll just skip writing out the cache,
however if it gets dirtied again in the same transaction and it finished caching
we'd go ahead and write it out, but since we set cache_generation to the transid
we think we've already truncated it and will just carry on, running into
cow_file_range and blowing up.  We need to make sure we only set
cache_generation if we've done the truncate.  The user tested this patch and
verified that the panic no longer occured.  Thanks,

Reported-and-Tested-by: Klaus Bitto <klaus.bitto@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-12-15 11:04:24 -05:00
Josef Bacik
660d3f6cde Btrfs: fix how we do delalloc reservations and how we free reservations on error
Running xfstests 269 with some tracing my scripts kept spitting out errors about
releasing bytes that we didn't actually have reserved.  This took me down a huge
rabbit hole and it turns out the way we deal with reserved_extents is wrong,
we need to only be setting it if the reservation succeeds, otherwise the free()
method will come in and unreserve space that isn't actually reserved yet, which
can lead to other warnings and such.  The math was all working out right in the
end, but it caused all sorts of other issues in addition to making my scripts
yell and scream and generally make it impossible for me to track down the
original issue I was looking for.  The other problem is with our error handling
in the reservation code.  There are two cases that we need to deal with

1) We raced with free.  In this case free won't free anything because csum_bytes
is modified before we dro the lock in our reservation path, so free rightly
doesn't release any space because the reservation code may be depending on that
reservation.  However if we fail, we need the reservation side to do the free at
that point since that space is no longer in use.  So as it stands the code was
doing this fine and it worked out, except in case #2

2) We don't race with free.  Nobody comes in and changes anything, and our
reservation fails.  In this case we didn't reserve anything anyway and we just
need to clean up csum_bytes but not free anything.  So we keep track of
csum_bytes before we drop the lock and if it hasn't changed we know we can just
decrement csum_bytes and carry on.

Because of the case where we can race with free()'s since we have to drop our
spin_lock to do the reservation, I'm going to serialize all reservations with
the i_mutex.  We already get this for free in the heavy use paths, truncate and
file write all hold the i_mutex, just needed to add it to page_mkwrite and
various ioctl/balance things.  With this patch my space leak scripts no longer
scream bloody murder.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-12-15 11:04:22 -05:00
Linus Torvalds
fb38f9b8fe Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  Btrfs: drop spin lock when memory alloc fails
  Btrfs: check if the to-be-added device is writable
  Btrfs: try cluster but don't advance in search list
  Btrfs: try to allocate from cluster even at LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE
2011-12-08 13:18:59 -08:00
Alexandre Oliva
274bd4fb3e Btrfs: try cluster but don't advance in search list
When we find an existing cluster, we switch to its block group as the
current block group, possibly skipping multiple blocks in the process.
Furthermore, under heavy contention, multiple threads may fail to
allocate from a cluster and then release just-created clusters just to
proceed to create new ones in a different block group.

This patch tries to allocate from an existing cluster regardless of its
block group, and doesn't switch to that group, instead proceeding to
try to allocate a cluster from the group it was iterating before the
attempt.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-12-08 08:55:40 -05:00
Alexandre Oliva
062c05c46b Btrfs: try to allocate from cluster even at LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE
If we reach LOOP_NO_EMPTY_SIZE, we won't even try to use a cluster that
others might have set up.  Odds are that there won't be one, but if
someone else succeeded in setting it up, we might as well use it, even
if we don't try to set up a cluster again.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-12-07 19:50:42 -05:00
Linus Torvalds
b930c26416 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  Btrfs: fix meta data raid-repair merge problem
  Btrfs: skip allocation attempt from empty cluster
  Btrfs: skip block groups without enough space for a cluster
  Btrfs: start search for new cluster at the beginning
  Btrfs: reset cluster's max_size when creating bitmap
  Btrfs: initialize new bitmaps' list
  Btrfs: fix oops when calling statfs on readonly device
  Btrfs: Don't error on resizing FS to same size
  Btrfs: fix deadlock on metadata reservation when evicting a inode
  Fix URL of btrfs-progs git repository in docs
  btrfs scrub: handle -ENOMEM from init_ipath()
2011-12-01 08:28:53 -08:00
Alexandre Oliva
be064d1139 Btrfs: skip allocation attempt from empty cluster
If we don't have a cluster, don't bother trying to allocate from it,
jumping right away to the attempt to allocate a new cluster.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-30 13:43:00 -05:00
Alexandre Oliva
425d83156c Btrfs: skip block groups without enough space for a cluster
We test whether a block group has enough free space to hold the
requested block, but when we're doing clustered allocation, we can
save some cycles by testing whether it has enough room for the cluster
upfront, otherwise we end up attempting to set up a cluster and
failing.  Only in the NO_EMPTY_SIZE loop do we attempt an unclustered
allocation, and by then we'll have zeroed the cluster size, so this
patch won't stop us from using the block group as a last resort.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-30 13:43:00 -05:00
Alexandre Oliva
1b22bad779 Btrfs: start search for new cluster at the beginning
Instead of starting at zero (offset is always zero), request a cluster
starting at search_start, that denotes the beginning of the current
block group.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Oliva <oliva@lsd.ic.unicamp.br>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-30 13:43:00 -05:00
Miao Xie
aa38a711a8 Btrfs: fix deadlock on metadata reservation when evicting a inode
When I ran the xfstests, I found the test tasks was blocked on meta-data
reservation.

By debugging, I found the reason of this bug:
   start transaction
        |
	v
   reserve meta-data space
	|
	v
   flush delay allocation -> iput inode -> evict inode
	^					|
	|					v
   wait for delay allocation flush <- reserve meta-data space

And besides that, the flush on evicting inode will block the thread, which
is reclaiming the memory, and make oom happen easily.

Fix this bug by skipping the flush step when evicting inode.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2011-11-30 18:46:03 +01:00
Linus Torvalds
af36d15f58 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  Btrfs: remove free-space-cache.c WARN during log replay
  Btrfs: sectorsize align offsets in fiemap
  Btrfs: clear pages dirty for io and set them extent mapped
  Btrfs: wait on caching if we're loading the free space cache
  Btrfs: prefix resize related printks with btrfs:
  btrfs: fix stat blocks accounting
  Btrfs: avoid unnecessary bitmap search for cluster setup
  Btrfs: fix to search one more bitmap for cluster setup
  btrfs: mirror_num should be int, not u64
  btrfs: Fix up 32/64-bit compatibility for new ioctls
  Btrfs: fix barrier flushes
  Btrfs: fix tree corruption after multi-thread snapshots and inode_cache flush
2011-11-22 08:53:40 -08:00
Josef Bacik
291c7d2f57 Btrfs: wait on caching if we're loading the free space cache
We've been hitting panics when running xfstest 13 in a loop for long periods of
time.  And actually this problem has always existed so we've been hitting these
things randomly for a while.  Basically what happens is we get a thread coming
into the allocator and reading the space cache off of disk and adding the
entries to the free space cache as we go.  Then we get another thread that comes
in and tries to allocate from that block group.  Since block_group->cached !=
BTRFS_CACHE_NO it goes ahead and tries to do the allocation.  We do this because
if we're doing the old slow way of caching we don't want to hold people up and
wait for everything to finish.  The problem with this is we could end up
discarding the space cache at some arbitrary point in the future, which means we
could very well end up allocating space that is either bad, or when the real
caching happens it could end up thinking the space isn't in use when it really
is and cause all sorts of other problems.

The solution is to add a new flag to indicate we are loading the free space
cache from disk, and always try to cache the block group if cache->cached !=
BTRFS_CACHE_FINISHED.  That way if we are loading the space cache anybody else
who tries to allocate from the block group will have to wait until it's finished
to make sure it completes successfully.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-11-20 07:42:16 -05:00
Linus Torvalds
c1f4246716 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs:
  btrfs: rename the option to nospace_cache
  Btrfs: handle bio_add_page failure gracefully in scrub
  Btrfs: fix deadlock caused by the race between relocation
  Btrfs: only map pages if we know we need them when reading the space cache
  Btrfs: fix orphan backref nodes
  Btrfs: Abstract similar code for btrfs_block_rsv_add{, _noflush}
  Btrfs: fix unreleased path in btrfs_orphan_cleanup()
  Btrfs: fix no reserved space for writing out inode cache
  Btrfs: fix nocow when deleting the item
  Btrfs: tweak the delayed inode reservations again
  Btrfs: rework error handling in btrfs_mount()
  Btrfs: close devices on all error paths in open_ctree()
  Btrfs: avoid null dereference and leaks when bailing from open_ctree()
  Btrfs: fix subvol_name leak on error in btrfs_mount()
  Btrfs: fix memory leak in btrfs_parse_early_options()
  Btrfs: fix our reservations for updating an inode when completing io
  Btrfs: fix oops on NULL trans handle in btrfs_truncate
  btrfs: fix double-free 'tree_root' in 'btrfs_mount()'
2011-11-11 23:47:06 -02:00
Miao Xie
61b520a9d0 Btrfs: Abstract similar code for btrfs_block_rsv_add{, _noflush}
btrfs_block_rsv_add{, _noflush}() have similar code, so abstract that code.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-10 20:45:05 -05:00
Josef Bacik
7fd2ae21a4 Btrfs: fix our reservations for updating an inode when completing io
People have been reporting ENOSPC crashes in finish_ordered_io.  This is because
we try to steal from the delalloc block rsv to satisfy a reservation to update
the inode.  The problem with this is we don't explicitly save space for updating
the inode when doing delalloc.  This is kind of a problem and we've gotten away
with this because way back when we just stole from the delalloc reserve without
any questions, and this worked out fine because generally speaking the leaf had
been modified either by the mtime update when we did the original write or
because we just updated the leaf when we inserted the file extent item, only on
rare occasions had the leaf not actually been modified, and that was still ok
because we'd just use a block or two out of the over-reservation that is
delalloc.

Then came the delayed inode stuff.  This is amazing, except it wants a full
reservation for updating the inode since it may do it at some point down the
road after we've written the blocks and we have to recow everything again.  This
worked out because the delayed inode stuff just stole from the global reserve,
that is until recently when I changed that because it caused other problems.

So here we are, we're doing everything right and being screwed for it.  So take
an extra reservation for the inode at delalloc reservation time and carry it
through the life of the delalloc reservation.  If we need it we can steal it in
the delayed inode stuff.  If we have already stolen it try and do a normal
metadata reservation.  If that fails try to steal from the delalloc reservation.
If _that_ fails we'll get a WARN_ON() so I can start thinking of a better way to
solve this and in the meantime we'll steal from the global reserve.

With this patch I ran xfstests 13 in a loop for a couple of hours and didn't see
any problems.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-08 15:47:34 -05:00
Linus Torvalds
6a6662ced4 Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs
* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs: (114 commits)
  Btrfs: check for a null fs root when writing to the backup root log
  Btrfs: fix race during transaction joins
  Btrfs: fix a potential btrfs_bio leak on scrub fixups
  Btrfs: rename btrfs_bio multi -> bbio for consistency
  Btrfs: stop leaking btrfs_bios on readahead
  Btrfs: stop the readahead threads on failed mount
  Btrfs: fix extent_buffer leak in the metadata IO error handling
  Btrfs: fix the new inspection ioctls for 32 bit compat
  Btrfs: fix delayed insertion reservation
  Btrfs: ClearPageError during writepage and clean_tree_block
  Btrfs: be smarter about committing the transaction in reserve_metadata_bytes
  Btrfs: make a delayed_block_rsv for the delayed item insertion
  Btrfs: add a log of past tree roots
  btrfs: separate superblock items out of fs_info
  Btrfs: use the global reserve when truncating the free space cache inode
  Btrfs: release metadata from global reserve if we have to fallback for unlink
  Btrfs: make sure to flush queued bios if write_cache_pages waits
  Btrfs: fix extent pinning bugs in the tree log
  Btrfs: make sure btrfs_remove_free_space doesn't leak EAGAIN
  Btrfs: don't wait as long for more batches during SSD log commit
  ...
2011-11-06 20:03:41 -08:00
Chris Mason
806468f8bf Merge git://git.jan-o-sch.net/btrfs-unstable into integration
Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/Makefile
	fs/btrfs/extent_io.c
	fs/btrfs/extent_io.h
	fs/btrfs/scrub.c

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-06 03:07:10 -05:00
Josef Bacik
c06a0e120a Btrfs: fix delayed insertion reservation
We all keep getting those stupid warnings from use_block_rsv when running
stress.sh, and it's because the delayed insertion stuff is being stupid.  It's
not the delayed insertion stuffs fault, it's all just stupid.  When marking an
inode dirty for oh say updating the time on it, we just do a
btrfs_join_transaction, which doesn't reserve any space.  This is stupid because
we're going to have to have space reserve to make this change, but we do it
because it's fast because chances are we're going to call it over and over again
and it doesn't matter.  Well thanks to the delayed insertion stuff this is
mostly the case, so we do actually need to make this reservation.  So if
trans->bytes_reserved is 0 then try to do a normal reservation.  If not return
ENOSPC which will make the btrfs_dirty_inode start a proper transaction which
will let it do the whole ENOSPC dance and reserve enough space for the delayed
insertion to steal the reservation from the transaction.

The other stupid thing we do is not reserve space for the inode when writing to
the thing.  Usually this is ok since we have to update the time so we'd have
already done all this work before we get to the endio stuff, so it doesn't
matter.  But this is stupid because we could write the data after the
transaction commits where we changed the mtime of the inode so we have to cow
all the way down to the inode anyway.  This used to be masked by the delalloc
reservation stuff, but because we delay the update it doesn't get masked in this
case.  So again the delayed insertion stuff bites us in the ass.  So if our
trans->block_rsv is delalloc, just steal the reservation from the delalloc
reserve.  Hopefully this won't bite us in the ass, but I've said that before.

With this patch stress.sh no longer spits out those stupid warnings (famous last
words).  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-06 03:04:20 -05:00
Josef Bacik
663350ac38 Btrfs: be smarter about committing the transaction in reserve_metadata_bytes
Because of the overcommit stuff I had to make it so that we committed the
transaction all the time in reserve_metadata_bytes in case we had overcommitted
because of delayed items.  This was because previously we had no way of knowing
how much space was reserved for delayed items.  Now that we have the
delayed_block_rsv we can check it to see if committing the transaction would get
us anywhere.  This patch breaks out the committing logic into a helper function
that will check to see if committing the transaction would free enough space for
us to get anything done.  With this patch xfstests 83 goes from taking 445
seconds to taking 28 seconds on my box.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-06 03:04:19 -05:00
Josef Bacik
6d668dda0c Btrfs: make a delayed_block_rsv for the delayed item insertion
I've been hitting warnings in use_block_rsv when running the delayed insertion
stuff.  It's because we will readjust global block rsv based on what is in use,
which means we could end up discarding reservations that are for the delayed
insertion stuff.  So instead create a seperate block rsv for the delayed
insertion stuff.  This will also make it easier to debug problems with the
delayed insertion reservations since we will know that only the delayed
insertion code touches this block_rsv.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-11-06 03:04:18 -05:00
David Sterba
6c41761fc6 btrfs: separate superblock items out of fs_info
fs_info has now ~9kb, more than fits into one page. This will cause
mount failure when memory is too fragmented. Top space consumers are
super block structures super_copy and super_for_commit, ~2.8kb each.
Allocate them dynamically. fs_info will be ~3.5kb. (measured on x86_64)

Add a wrapper for freeing fs_info and all of it's dynamically allocated
members.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2011-11-06 03:04:01 -05:00
Chris Mason
e688b7252f Btrfs: fix extent pinning bugs in the tree log
The tree log had two important bugs that could cause corruptions after a
crash.  Sometimes we were allowing tree log blocks to be reused after
the tree log was committed but before the transaction commit was done.

This allowed a future metadata write to overwrite the tree log data.  It
is fixed by adding a new variant of freeing reserved extents that always
pins them.  Credit goes to Stefan Behrens and Arne Jansen for many many
hours spent tracking this bug down.

During tree log replay, we do a pass through the tree log and pin all
the extents we find.  This makes sure the replay code won't go in and
use any of those blocks for new allocations during replay.  The problem
is the free space cache isn't honoring these pinned extents.  So the
allocator can end up handing them out, leading to all kinds of problems
during replay.

The fix here is to force any free space cache to load while we pin the
extents, and then to make sure we remove the pinned extents from the
free space rbtree.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Stefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
2011-11-06 03:03:48 -05:00
Curt Wohlgemuth
0e175a1835 writeback: Add a 'reason' to wb_writeback_work
This creates a new 'reason' field in a wb_writeback_work
structure, which unambiguously identifies who initiates
writeback activity.  A 'wb_reason' enumeration has been
added to writeback.h, to enumerate the possible reasons.

The 'writeback_work_class' and tracepoint event class and
'writeback_queue_io' tracepoints are updated to include the
symbolic 'reason' in all trace events.

And the 'writeback_inodes_sbXXX' family of routines has had
a wb_stats parameter added to them, so callers can specify
why writeback is being started.

Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Curt Wohlgemuth <curtw@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
2011-10-31 00:33:36 +08:00
David Sterba
dff51cd1c6 btrfs: ratelimit WARN_ON in use_block_rsv
The WARN_ON under some circumstances heavily polute log and slow down
the machine. This is just a safety, as the warning should be fixed by
another patch, nevertheless, it still pops up during testing.

Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
2011-10-24 14:48:00 +02:00
Miao Xie
60d2adbb1e Btrfs: fix race between multi-task space allocation and caching space
The task may fail to get free space though it is enough when multi-task
space allocation and caching space happen at the same time.

	Task1			Caching Thread		Task2
	------------------------------------------------------------------------
	find_free_extent
	  The space has not
	  be cached, and start
	  caching thread. And
	  wait for it.
				cache space, if
				the space is > 2MB
				wake up Task1
							find_free_extent
							  get all the space that
							  is cached.
	  try to allocate space,
	  but there is no space
	  now.
	trigger BUG_ON()

The message is following:
btrfs allocation failed flags 1, wanted 4096
space_info has 1040187392 free, is not full
space_info total=1082130432, used=4096, pinned=41938944, reserved=0, may_use=40828928, readonly=0
block group 12582912 has 8388608 bytes, 0 used 8388608 pinned 0 reserved
block group has cluster?: no
0 blocks of free space at or bigger than bytes is
block group 1103101952 has 1073741824 bytes, 4096 used 33550336 pinned 0 reserved
block group has cluster?: no
0 blocks of free space at or bigger than bytes is
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/inode.c:835!
 [<ffffffffa031261b>] __extent_writepage+0x1bf/0x5ce [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff810cbcb8>] ? __set_page_dirty_nobuffers+0xfe/0x108
 [<ffffffffa02f8ada>] ? wait_current_trans+0x23/0xec [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff810c3fbf>] ? find_get_pages_tag+0x73/0xe2
 [<ffffffffa0312d12>] extent_write_cache_pages.clone.0+0x176/0x29a [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0312e74>] extent_writepages+0x3e/0x53 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff8110ad2c>] ? do_sync_write+0xc6/0x103
 [<ffffffffa0302d6e>] ? btrfs_submit_direct+0x414/0x414 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff811380fa>] ? fsnotify+0x236/0x266
 [<ffffffffa02fc930>] btrfs_writepages+0x22/0x24 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff810cc215>] do_writepages+0x1c/0x25
 [<ffffffff810c4958>] __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x4e/0x50
 [<ffffffff810c4982>] filemap_write_and_wait_range+0x28/0x51
 [<ffffffffa0306b2e>] btrfs_sync_file+0x7d/0x198 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff8110aa26>] ? fsnotify_modify+0x5d/0x65
 [<ffffffff8112d150>] vfs_fsync_range+0x18/0x21
 [<ffffffff8112d170>] vfs_fsync+0x17/0x19
 [<ffffffff8112d316>] do_fsync+0x29/0x3e
 [<ffffffff8112d348>] sys_fsync+0xb/0xf
 [<ffffffff81468352>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[SNIP]
RIP  [<ffffffffa02fe08c>] cow_file_range+0x1c4/0x32b [btrfs]

We fix this bug by trying to allocate the space again if there are block groups
in caching.

Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
2011-10-20 18:10:49 +02:00
Ilya Dryomov
10b2f34d6e Btrfs: pass the correct root to lookup_free_space_inode()
Free space items are located in tree of tree roots, not in the extent
tree.  It didn't pop up because lookup_free_space_inode() grabs the
inode all the time instead of actually searching the tree.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com>
2011-10-20 18:10:46 +02:00
Josef Bacik
7e355b83ef Btrfs: if we have a lot of pinned space, commit the transaction
Mitch kept hitting a panic because he was getting ENOSPC.  One of my previous
patches makes it so we are much better at not allocating new metadata chunks.
Unfortunately coupled with the overcommit patch this works us into a bit of a
problem if we are removing a bunch of space and end up chewing up all of our
space with pinned extents.  We can allocate chunks fine and overflow is ok, but
the only way to reclaim this space is to commit the transaction.  So if we go to
overcommit, first check and see how much pinned space we have.  If we have more
than 80% of the free space chewed up with pinned extents, just commit the
transaction, this will free up enough space for our reservation and we won't
have this problem anymore.  With this patch Mitch's test doesn't blow up
anymore.  Thanks,

Reported-and-tested-by: Mitch Harder <mitch.harder@sabayonlinux.org>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:13:00 -04:00
Josef Bacik
36ba022ac0 Btrfs: seperate out btrfs_block_rsv_check out into 2 different functions
Currently btrfs_block_rsv_check does 2 things, it will either refill a block
reserve like in the truncate or refill case, or it will check to see if there is
enough space in the global reserve and possibly refill it.  However because of
overcommit we could be well overcommitting ourselves just to try and refill the
global reserve, when really we should just be committing the transaction.  So
breack this out into btrfs_block_rsv_refill and btrfs_block_rsv_check.  Refill
will try to reserve more metadata if it can and btrfs_block_rsv_check will not,
it will only tell you if the factor of the total space is still reserved.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:59 -04:00
Josef Bacik
b24e03db0d Btrfs: release trans metadata bytes before flushing delayed refs
We started setting trans->block_rsv = NULL to allow the delayed refs flushing
stuff to use the right block_rsv and then just made
btrfs_trans_release_metadata() unconditionally use the trans block rsv.  The
problem with this is we need to reserve some space in the transaction and then
migrate it to the global block rsv, so we need to be able to free that out
properly.  So instead just move btrfs_trans_release_metadata() before the
delayed ref flushing and use trans->block_rsv for the freeing.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:58 -04:00
Josef Bacik
877da17430 Btrfs: allow shrink_delalloc flush the needed reclaimed pages
Currently we only allow a maximum of 2 megabytes of pages to be flushed at a
time.  This was ok before, but now we have overcommit which will screw us in a
heartbeat if we are quickly filling the disk.  So instead pick either 2
megabytes or the number of pages we need to reclaim to be safe again, which ever
is larger.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:58 -04:00
Josef Bacik
f104d04437 Btrfs: wait for ordered extents if we're in trouble when shrinking delalloc
The only way we actually reclaim delalloc space is waiting for the IO to
completely finish.  Usually we kick off a bunch of IO and wait for a little bit
and hope we can make our reservation, and usually this works out pretty well.
With overcommit however we can get seriously underwater if we're filling up the
disk quickly, so we need to be able to force the delalloc shrinker to wait for
the ordered IO to finish to give us a better chance of actually reclaiming
enough space to get our reservation.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:57 -04:00
Josef Bacik
bbb495c2ed Btrfs: don't check bytes_pinned to determine if we should commit the transaction
Before the only reason to commit the transaction to recover space in
reserve_metadata_bytes() was if there were enough pinned_bytes to satisfy our
reservation.  But now we have the delayed inode stuff which will hold it's
reservations until we commit the transaction.  So say we max out our reservation
by creating a bunch of files but don't have any pinned bytes we will ENOSPC out
early even though we could commit the transaction and get that space back.  So
now just unconditionally commit the transaction since currently there is no way
to know how much metadata space is being reserved by delayed inode stuff.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:56 -04:00
Josef Bacik
4b91c14f91 Btrfs: wait for ordered extents if we didn't reclaim enough
I noticed recently that my overcommit patch was causing one of my enospc tests
to fail 25% of the time with early ENOSPC.  This is because my overcommit patch
was letting us go way over board, but it wasn't waiting long enough to let the
delalloc shrinker do it's job.  The problem is we just start writeback and wait
a little bit hoping we flush enough, but we only free up delalloc space by
having the writes complete all the way.  We do this by waiting for ordered
extents, which we do but only if we already free'd enough for the reservation,
which isn't right, we should flush ordered extents if we didn't reclaim enough
in case that will push us over the edge.  With this patch I've not seen a
failure in this enospc test after running it in a loop for an hour.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:55 -04:00
Josef Bacik
5b0e95bf60 Btrfs: inline checksums into the disk free space cache
Yeah yeah I know this is how we used to do it and then I changed it, but damnit
I'm changing it back.  The fact is that writing out checksums will modify
metadata, which could cause us to dirty a block group we've already written out,
so we have to truncate it and all of it's checksums and re-write it which will
write new checksums which could dirty a blockg roup that has already been
written and you see where I'm going with this?  This can cause unmount or really
anything that depends on a transaction to commit to take it's sweet damned time
to happen.  So go back to the way it was, only this time we're specifically
setting NODATACOW because we can't go through the COW pathway anyway and we're
doing our own built-in cow'ing by truncating the free space cache.  The other
new thing is once we truncate the old cache and preallocate the new space, we
don't need to do that song and dance at all for the rest of the transaction, we
can just overwrite the existing space with the new cache if the block group
changes for whatever reason, and the NODATACOW will let us do this fine.  So
keep track of which transaction we last cleared our cache in and if we cleared
it in this transaction just say we're all setup and carry on.  This survives
xfstests and stress.sh.

The inode cache will continue to use the normal csum infrastructure since it
only gets written once and there will be no more modifications to the fs tree in
a transaction commit.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:54 -04:00
Josef Bacik
9a82ca659d Btrfs: take overflow into account in reserving space
My overcommit stuff can be a little racy when we're filling up the disk with
fs_mark and we overcommit into things that quickly get used up for data.  So use
num_bytes to see if we have enough available space so we're less likely to
overcommit ourselves out of the ability to make reservations.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:53 -04:00
Josef Bacik
73bc187680 Btrfs: introduce mount option no_space_cache
Some users have requested this and I've found I needed a way to disable cache
loading without actually clearing the cache, so introduce the no_space_cache
option.  Before we check the super blocks cache generation field and if it was
populated we always turned space caching on.  Now we check this and set the
space cache option on, and then parse the mount options so that if we want it
off it get's turned off.  Then we check the mount option all the places we do
the caching work instead of checking the super's cache generation.  This makes
things more consistent and lets us turn space caching off.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:51 -04:00
Josef Bacik
2bf64758fd Btrfs: allow us to overcommit our enospc reservations
One of the things that kills us is the fact that our ENOSPC reservations are
horribly over the top in most normal cases.  There isn't too much that can be
done about this because when we are completely full we really need them to work
like this so we don't under reserve.  However if there is plenty of unallocated
chunks on the disk we can use that to gauge how much we can overcommit.  So this
patch adds chunk free space accounting so we always know how much unallocated
space we have.  Then if we fail to make a reservation within our allocated
space, check to see if we can overcommit.  In the normal flushing case (like
with delalloc metadata reservations) we'll take the free space and divide it by
2 if our metadata profile is setup for DUP or any of those, and then divide it
by 8 to make sure we don't overcommit too much.  Then if we're in a non-flushing
case (we really need this reservation now!) we only limit ourselves to half of
the free space.  This makes this fio test

[torrent]
filename=torrent-test
rw=randwrite
size=4g
ioengine=sync
directory=/mnt/btrfs-test

go from taking around 45 minutes to 10 seconds on my freshly formatted 3 TiB
file system.  This doesn't seem to break my other enospc tests, but could really
use some more testing as this is a super scary change.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:50 -04:00
Josef Bacik
ef3be45722 Btrfs: check unused against how much space we actually want
There is a bug that may lead to early ENOSPC in our reservation code.  We've
been checking against num_bytes which may be above and beyond what we want to
actually reserve, which could give us a false ENOSPC.  Fix this by making sure
the unused space is above how much we want to reserve and not how much we're
trying to flush.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:47 -04:00
Josef Bacik
455757c322 Btrfs: delay iput when deleting a block group
I kept getting warnings from evict because we were calling
btrfs_start_transaction() with a transaction already started when doing a
balance.  This is because we remove a block group which requires a transaction,
and the put the last reference on the cache inode.  Instead of doing this we
need to delay the iput so it is done not within a transaction having started.
This gets rid of our warnings.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:45 -04:00
Josef Bacik
4a92b1b8d2 Btrfs: stop passing a trans handle all around the reservation code
The only thing that we need to have a trans handle for is in
reserve_metadata_bytes and thats to know how much flushing we can do.  So
instead of passing it around, just check current->journal_info for a
trans_handle so we know if we can commit a transaction to try and free up space
or not.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:44 -04:00
Josef Bacik
d02c9955de Btrfs: don't get the block_rsv in btrfs_free_tree_block
Since the durable block rsv stuff has been killed there is no need to get the
block_rsv in btrfs_free_tree_block anymore.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:43 -04:00
Josef Bacik
4c13d758b7 Btrfs: use the transactions block_rsv for the csum root
The alloc warnings everybody has been seeing is because we have been reserving
space for csums, but we weren't actually using that space.  So make
get_block_rsv() return the trans->block_rsv if we're modifying the csum root.
Also set the trans->block_rsv to NULL so that if we modify the csum root when
running delayed ref's that comes out of the global reserve like it's supposed
to.  With this patch I'm not seeing those alloc warnings anymore.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:42 -04:00
Josef Bacik
c09544e07f Btrfs: handle enospc accounting for free space inodes
Since free space inodes now use normal checksumming we need to make sure to
account for their metadata use.  So reserve metadata space, and then if we fail
to write out the metadata we can just release it, otherwise it will be freed up
when the io completes.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:42 -04:00
Josef Bacik
7f70150896 Btrfs: don't increase the block_rsv's size when emergency allocating space
If we have to emergency reserve space we need to not increase the block_rsv
size, otherwise we'll leak space.  Take for instance delalloc, say we reserve
4k, and we use that 4k, and then we have to emergency allocate another 4k, we
bump the size up to 8k, however we've only accounted for 4k in reservations in
all of our supporting logic, so we'll go to free the 4k and end up having a size
of 4k, which will cause us to later not free as much space.  I saw this doing
testing where I wasn't reserving enough space for something but was still
leaking space, very frustrating.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:40 -04:00
Josef Bacik
7ed49f187c Btrfs: fix space leak when we fail to make an allocation
When changing back to using a spin_lock to protect the extent counters I decided
that since we would only be dropping our original extent, it was ok to just drop
the extent and return.  However since somebody else could have come in and done
a reservation, we need to do the normal song and dance to clear the reservation
out properly.  So calculate how much space we need to free, and then subtract
what we just attempted to reserve.  If it's more then we know we need to drop
those bytes from the delalloc block rsv.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:39 -04:00
Josef Bacik
482e6dc526 Btrfs: allow callers to specify if flushing can occur for btrfs_block_rsv_check
If you run xfstest 224 it you will get lots of messages about not being able to
delete inodes and that they will be cleaned up next mount.  This is because
btrfs_block_rsv_check was not calling reserve_metadata_bytes with the ability to
flush, so if there was not enough space, it simply failed.  But in truncate and
evict case we could easily flush space to try and get enough space to do our
work, so make btrfs_block_rsv_check take a flush argument to pass down to
reserve_metadata_bytes.  Now xfstests 224 runs fine without all those
complaints.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:38 -04:00
Josef Bacik
5e962c7850 Btrfs: kill btrfs_truncate_reserve_metadata
Since we've optimized the truncate path, we no longer require this function.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:36 -04:00
Josef Bacik
13553e5221 Btrfs: don't try to commit in btrfs_block_rsv_check
We will try and reserve metadata bytes in btrfs_block_rsv_check and if we cannot
because we have a transaction open it will return EAGAIN, so we do not need to
try and commit the transaction again.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:35 -04:00
Josef Bacik
dabdb6408c Btrfs: kill unused parts of block_rsv
The priority and refill_used flags are not used anymore, and neither is the
usage counter, so just remove them from btrfs_block_rsv.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:34 -04:00
Josef Bacik
37be25bcb6 Btrfs: kill the durable block rsv stuff
This is confusing code and isn't used by anything anymore, so delete it.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:32 -04:00
Josef Bacik
7709cde33f Btrfs: calculate checksum space correctly
We have not been reserving enough space for checksums.  We were just reserving
bytes for the checksum items themselves, we were not taking into account having
to cow the tree and such.  This patch adds a csum_bytes counter to the inode for
keeping track of the number of bytes outstanding we have for checksums.  Then we
calculate how many leaves would be required for the checksums we are given and
use that to reserve space.  This adds a significant amount of bytes to our
reservations, but we will handle this later.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:31 -04:00
Josef Bacik
fb25e9141a Btrfs: use bytes_may_use for all ENOSPC reservations
We have been using bytes_reserved for metadata reservations, which is wrong
since we use that to keep track of outstanding reservations from the allocator.
This resulted in us doing a lot of silly things to make sure we don't allocate a
bunch of metadata chunks since we never had a real view of how much space was
actually in use by metadata.

This passes Arne's enospc test and xfstests as well as my own enospc tests.
Hopefully this will get us moving in the right direction.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:30 -04:00
Josef Bacik
0cbbdf7c9c Btrfs: kill reserved_bytes in inode
reserved_bytes is not used for anything in the inode, remove it.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-10-19 15:12:28 -04:00
Jan Schmidt
a1d3c4786a btrfs: btrfs_multi_bio replaced with btrfs_bio
btrfs_bio is a bio abstraction able to split and not complete after the last
bio has returned (like the old btrfs_multi_bio). Additionally, btrfs_bio
tracks the mirror_num used to read data which can be used for error
correction purposes.

Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
2011-09-29 13:38:42 +02:00
Josef Bacik
6719db6a23 Btrfs: fix 64 bit divide problem
This fixes a regression introduced by commit cdcb725c05 ("Btrfs: check
if there is enough space for balancing smarter").  We can't do 64-bit
divides on 32-bit architectures.

In cases where we need to divide/multiply by 2 we should just left/right
shift respectively, and in cases where theres N number of devices use
do_div.  Also make the counters u64 to match up with rw_devices.
Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Acked-and-tested-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2011-08-21 07:02:00 -07:00
Tsutomu Itoh
cb1b69f450 Btrfs: forced readonly when btrfs_drop_snapshot() fails
The filesystem turns readonly instead of returning the error to the
caller when detected error in btrfs_drop_snapshot().
and, because the caller doesn't check the error, the function type is
changed to 'void'.

Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-16 21:09:15 -04:00
liubo
cdcb725c05 Btrfs: check if there is enough space for balancing smarter
When checking if there is enough space for balancing a block group,
since we do not take raid types into consideration, we do not account
corrent amounts of space that we needed.  This makes us do some extra
work before we get ENOSPC.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-16 21:09:15 -04:00
Josef Bacik
d5e2003c2b Btrfs: detect wether a device supports discard
We have a problem where if a user specifies discard but doesn't actually support
it we will return EOPNOTSUPP from btrfs_discard_extent.  This is a problem
because this gets called (in a fashion) from the tree log recovery code, which
has a nice little BUG_ON(ret) after it, which causes us to fail the tree log
replay.  So instead detect wether our devices support discard when we're adding
them and then don't issue discards if we know that the device doesn't support
it.  And just for good measure set ret = 0 in btrfs_issue_discard just in case
we still get EOPNOTSUPP so we don't screw anybody up like this again.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-16 21:09:15 -04:00
Josef Bacik
b783e62d96 Btrfs: don't print the leaf if we had an error
In __btrfs_free_extent we will print the leaf if we fail to find the extent we
wanted, but the problem is if we get an error we won't have a leaf so often this
leads to a NULL pointer dereference and we lose the error that actually
occurred.  So only print the leaf if ret > 0, which means we didn't find the
item we were looking for but we didn't error either.  This way the error is
preserved.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-01 14:30:45 -04:00
liubo
ff1f2b4407 Btrfs: fix oops while writing data to SSD partitions
Here I have a two SSD-partitions btrfs, and they are defaultly set to
"data=raid0, metadata=raid1", then I try to fill my btrfs partition
till "No space left on device", via "dd if=/dev/zero of=/mnt/btrfs/tmp".

I get an oops panic from kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:5199!, which
refers to find_free_extent's
BUG_ON(index != get_block_group_index(block_group));

In SSD mode, in order to find enough space to alloc, we may check the
block_group cache which has been checked sometime before, but the index is not
updated, where it hits the BUG_ON.

Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Acked-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-01 14:30:44 -04:00
WuBo
61cfea9bb8 Btrfs: Protect the readonly flag of block group
The access for ro in btrfs_block_group_cache should be protected
because of the racy lock in relocation.

Signed-off-by: Wu Bo <wu.bo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-01 14:30:43 -04:00
Tsutomu Itoh
b532402e4d Btrfs: return error to caller when btrfs_unlink() failes
When btrfs_unlink_inode() and btrfs_orphan_add() in btrfs_unlink()
are error, the error code is returned to the caller instead of
BUG_ON().

Signed-off-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-08-01 14:30:42 -04:00
Chris Mason
b43b31bdf2 Merge branch 'alloc_path' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mfasheh/btrfs-error-handling into for-linus 2011-08-01 14:27:34 -04:00
Chris Mason
75c195a2ca Btrfs: make sure reserve_metadata_bytes doesn't leak out strange errors
The btrfs transaction code will return any errors that come from
reserve_metadata_bytes.  We need to make sure we don't return funny
things like 1 or EAGAIN.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-07-27 16:11:41 -04:00
Chris Mason
85d4e46111 Btrfs: make a lockdep class for each root
This patch was originally from Tejun Heo.  lockdep complains about the btrfs
locking because we sometimes take btree locks from two different trees at the
same time.  The current classes are based only on level in the btree, which
isn't enough information for lockdep to figure out if the lock is safe.

This patch makes a class for each type of tree, and lumps all the FS trees that
actually have files and directories into the same class.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-07-27 12:46:46 -04:00
Chris Mason
bd681513fa Btrfs: switch the btrfs tree locks to reader/writer
The btrfs metadata btree is the source of significant
lock contention, especially in the root node.   This
commit changes our locking to use a reader/writer
lock.

The lock is built on top of rw spinlocks, and it
extends the lock tracking to remember if we have a
read lock or a write lock when we go to blocking.  Atomics
count the number of blocking readers or writers at any
given time.

It removes all of the adaptive spinning from the old code
and uses only the spinning/blocking hints inside of btrfs
to decide when it should continue spinning.

In read heavy workloads this is dramatically faster.  In write
heavy workloads we're still faster because of less contention
on the root node lock.

We suffer slightly in dbench because we schedule more often
during write locks, but all other benchmarks so far are improved.

Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-07-27 12:46:46 -04:00
Miao Xie
199c36eaa9 Btrfs: fix BUG_ON() caused by ENOSPC when relocating space
When we balanced the chunks across the devices, BUG_ON() in
__finish_chunk_alloc() was triggered.

------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:2568!
[SNIP]
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa049525e>] btrfs_alloc_chunk+0x8e/0xa0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04546b0>] do_chunk_alloc+0x330/0x3a0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa045c654>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xb4/0x1f0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa045c86b>] btrfs_alloc_free_block+0xdb/0x350 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa048a8d8>] ? read_extent_buffer+0xd8/0x1d0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa04476fd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x14d/0x5e0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa044660d>] ? read_block_for_search+0x14d/0x4d0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0447c9b>] btrfs_cow_block+0x10b/0x240 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa044dd5e>] btrfs_search_slot+0x49e/0x7a0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa044f07d>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x8d/0xf0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa045e973>] insert_with_overflow+0x43/0x110 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa045eb0d>] btrfs_insert_dir_item+0xcd/0x1f0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0489bd0>] ? map_extent_buffer+0xb0/0xc0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff812276ad>] ? rb_insert_color+0x9d/0x160
 [<ffffffffa046cc40>] ? inode_tree_add+0xf0/0x150 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0474801>] btrfs_add_link+0xc1/0x1c0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff811dacac>] ? security_inode_init_security+0x1c/0x30
 [<ffffffffa04a28aa>] ? btrfs_init_acl+0x4a/0x180 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa047492f>] btrfs_add_nondir+0x2f/0x70 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa046af16>] ? btrfs_init_inode_security+0x46/0x60 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffffa0474ac0>] btrfs_create+0x150/0x1d0 [btrfs]
 [<ffffffff81159c63>] ? generic_permission+0x23/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8115b415>] vfs_create+0xa5/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8115ce6e>] do_last+0x5fe/0x880
 [<ffffffff8115dc0d>] path_openat+0xcd/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff8115e029>] do_filp_open+0x49/0xa0
 [<ffffffff8116a965>] ? alloc_fd+0x95/0x160
 [<ffffffff8114f0c7>] do_sys_open+0x107/0x1e0
 [<ffffffff810bcc3f>] ? audit_syscall_entry+0x1bf/0x1f0
 [<ffffffff8114f1e0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
 [<ffffffff81484ec2>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
[SNIP]
RIP  [<ffffffffa049444a>] __finish_chunk_alloc+0x20a/0x220 [btrfs]

The reason is:
Task1					Space balance task
do_chunk_alloc()
  __finish_chunk_alloc()
    update device info
    in the chunk tree
      alloc system metadata block
					relocate system metadata block group
					  set system metadata block group
					  readonly, This block group is the
					  only one that can allocate space. So
					  there is no free space that can be
					  allocated now.
        find no space and don't try
        to alloc new chunk, and then
        return ENOSPC
  BUG_ON() in __finish_chunk_alloc()
  was triggered.

Fix this bug by allocating a new system metadata chunk before relocating the
old one if we find there is no free space which can be allocated after setting
the old block group to be read-only.

Reported-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-07-27 12:46:45 -04:00
Josef Bacik
9e0baf60de Btrfs: fix enospc problems with delalloc
So I had this brilliant idea to use atomic counters for outstanding and reserved
extents, but this turned out to be a bad idea.  Consider this where we have 1
outstanding extent and 1 reserved extent

Reserver				Releaser
					atomic_dec(outstanding) now 0
atomic_read(outstanding)+1 get 1
atomic_read(reserved) get 1
don't actually reserve anything because
they are the same
					atomic_cmpxchg(reserved, 1, 0)
atomic_inc(outstanding)
atomic_add(0, reserved)
					free reserved space for 1 extent

Then the reserver now has no actual space reserved for it, and when it goes to
finish the ordered IO it won't have enough space to do it's allocation and you
get those lovely warnings.

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-07-27 12:46:44 -04:00
Josef Bacik
a599142806 Btrfs: don't flush delalloc arbitrarily
Kill the check to see if we have 512mb of reserved space in delalloc and
shrink_delalloc if we do.  This causes unexpected latencies and we have other
logic to see if we need to throttle.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
2011-07-27 12:46:43 -04:00
Josef Bacik
bab39bf998 Btrfs: use a worker thread to do caching
A user reported a deadlock when copying a bunch of files.  This is because they
were low on memory and kthreadd got hung up trying to migrate pages for an
allocation when starting the caching kthread.  The page was locked by the person
starting the caching kthread.  To fix this we just need to use the async thread
stuff so that the threads are already created and we don't have to worry about
deadlocks.  Thanks,

Reported-by: Roman Mamedov <rm@romanrm.ru>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
2011-07-27 12:46:25 -04:00
Mark Fasheh
38a1a91953 btrfs: don't BUG_ON allocation errors in btrfs_drop_snapshot
In addition to properly handling allocation failure from btrfs_alloc_path, I
also fixed up the kzalloc error handling code immediately below it.

Signed-off-by: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com>
2011-07-25 14:35:15 -07:00