This adds a document about what specification features are supported by
the Linux NVMe driver, and what qualifies for a quirk if an implementation
has problems following the specification.
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
fixes from Mauro and Akira; I also took the liberty of dropping in my
"messy diffstat" document.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQFDBAABCAAtFiEEIw+MvkEiF49krdp9F0NaE2wMflgFAmJFzSkPHGNvcmJldEBs
d24ubmV0AAoJEBdDWhNsDH5Yyp0H/jnK0edIgumAwGMBb2IeVImKsV8IU4Gdw1yo
RgetPAWP/i/KqR1JczLnwd+K/0KuOb1nifJO8MfCwN2GowlOdg5WuHkBfkUhoUy8
LK+Z1E7HN3riveBJKxRyOXTxvFkDVm8aD8s3C3NZjX1Tz8Xwe7v69YDJ3MCSBHZb
TxiffdSdBgDbL6A3nnH7fwUW94l0fv3RWhXU8ddW3i7rEmjafXlV+8MHniY1EGNz
r2Ej4J9/vdLIT37yl9vb28D45HdS937h4aQKhJJ7ZzLnwuOkgDUJ7LyL2GepATlN
v2nU0vge8125fDZQPGxJ00S5TITqN8PoQ9dkVRcOlzXR1n9Px70=
=Rbru
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'docs-5.18-2' of git://git.lwn.net/linux
Pull more documentation updates from Jonathan Corbet:
"Some late-arriving documentation improvements.
This is mostly build-system fixes from Mauro and Akira; I also took
the liberty of dropping in my 'messy diffstat' document"
* tag 'docs-5.18-2' of git://git.lwn.net/linux:
docs: Add a document on how to fix a messy diffstat
docs: sphinx/requirements: Limit jinja2<3.1
Documentation: kunit: Fix cross-referencing warnings
scripts/kernel-doc: change the line number meta info
scripts/get_abi: change the file/line number meta info
docs: kernel_include.py: add sphinx build dependencies
docs: kernel_abi.py: add sphinx build dependencies
docs: kernel_feat.py: add build dependencies
scripts/get_feat.pl: allow output the parsed file names
docs: kfigure.py: Don't warn of missing PDF converter in 'make htmldocs'
Documentation: Fix duplicate statement about raw_spinlock_t type
Device specific extensions for devices exposed to userspace through
the vfio-pci-core library open both new functionality and new risks.
Here we attempt to provided formalized requirements and expectations
to ensure that future drivers both collaborate in their interaction
with existing host drivers, as well as receive additional reviews
from community members with experience in this area.
Acked-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@nvidia.com>
Acked-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/164736509088.181560.2887686123582116702.stgit@omen
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Change all links from using the lkml redirector to the lore redirector,
as the kernel.org admin recently indicated: we shouldn't be using
lkml.kernel.org anymore because the domain can create confusion, as it
indicates it is only valid for messages sent to the LKML; the convention
has been to use https://lore.kernel.org/r/msgid for this reason.
In this process also change three links from using http to https.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211006170025.qw3glxvocczfuhar@meerkat.local
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
CC: Hu Haowen <src.res@email.cn>
CC: Alex Shi <alexs@kernel.org>
CC: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@vaga.pv.it>
Signed-off-by: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
Reviewed-by: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5bb55bac6ba10fafab19bf2b21572dd0e2f8cea2.1633593385.git.linux@leemhuis.info
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
The repeated sign-offs necessary when a subsystem maintainer modifies an
incoming patch has been moved from submitting-patches.rst to
Documentation/maintainer, since the affairs of a subsystem maintainer
are not especially relevant to someone reading a guide for how to submit
their first patch.
Signed-off-by: Drew DeVault <sir@cmpwn.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200903160545.83185-4-sir@cmpwn.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
As long as there are only a few maintainer entry profiles, i.e., three
in v5.8, continue to maintain a complete a list of entries in the
maintainer handbook.
Complete the list by adding the RISC-V ARCHITECTURE maintainer entry
profile found in MAINTAINERS.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200815115728.15128-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Documentation should lead by example, so here's a basic maintainer entry
profile for this subsystem.
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Add blank lines where needed to get the document to render properly. Also
add a TOC of existing profiles just so that the nvdimm profile is linked
into the toctree, is discoverable, and doesn't generate a warning.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
As presented at the 2018 Linux Plumbers conference [1], the Maintainer
Entry Profile (formerly Subsystem Profile) is proposed as a way to reduce
friction between committers and maintainers and encourage conversations
amongst maintainers about common best practices. While coding-style,
submit-checklist, and submitting-drivers lay out some common expectations
there remain local customs and maintainer preferences that vary by
subsystem.
The profile contains documentation of some of the common policy
questions a contributor might have that are local to the subsystem /
device-driver, special considerations for the subsystem, or other
guidelines that are otherwise not covered by the top-level process
documents.
The initial and hopefully non-controversial headings in the profile are:
Overview:
General introduction to how the subsystem operates
Submit Checklist Addendum:
Mechanical items that gate submission staging, or other requirements
that gate patch acceptance.
Key Cycle Dates:
- Last -rc for new feature submissions: Expected lead time for submissions
- Last -rc to merge features: Deadline for merge decisions
Resubmit Cadence: When and preferred method to follow up with the
maintainer
Note that coding style guidelines are explicitly left out of this list.
See Documentation/maintainer/maintainer-entry-profile.rst for more details,
and a follow-on example profile for the libnvdimm subsystem.
[1]: https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/2/contributions/59/
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>
Cc: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/157462919309.1729495.10585699280061787229.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Now that the latex_documents are handled automatically, we can
remove those extra conf.py files.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Every merge window seems to involve at least one episode where subsystem
maintainers don't manage their trees as Linus would like. Document the
expectations so that at least he has something to point people to.
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
As we move stuff around, some doc references are broken. Fix some of
them via this script:
./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check --fix
Manually checked that produced results are valid.
Acked-by: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Acked-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
There is currently very little documentation in the kernel on maintainer
level tasks. In particular there are no documents on creating pull
requests to submit to Linus.
Quoting Greg Kroah-Hartman on LKML:
Anyway, this actually came up at the kernel summit / maintainer
meeting a few weeks ago, in that "how do I make a
good pull request to Linus" is something we need to document.
Here's what I do, and it seems to work well, so maybe we should turn
it into the start of the documentation for how to do it.
(quote references: kernel summit, Europe 2017)
Create a new kernel documentation book 'how to be a maintainer'
(suggested by Jonathan Corbet). Add chapters on 'configuring git' and
'creating a pull request'.
Most of the content was written by Linus Torvalds and Greg Kroah-Hartman
in discussion on LKML. This is stated at the start of one of the
chapters and the original email thread is referenced in
'pull-requests.rst'.
Signed-off-by: Tobin C. Harding <me@tobin.cc>
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
