"Comm", "Count", "DataLow", "DataHigh" are not used in this section.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
"as usual" does not mean much here, especially as these are introductory
sections and 10-bit addressing hasn't been introduced yet.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
This sentence dates back to the pre-git era and it does not look very
professional... As there is no clear definition of "finished", and given
this page is already a pretty good overview, not to mention it is not the
kernel responsibility to document the protocol in detail, let's update the
text accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@kernel.org>
In smbus-protocol.rst we use the text "Implemented by" for the same meaning
as "This corresponds to". Change everything to "Implemented by" for
coherency.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Reported-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Some of the section names are not very clear. Reading those names in the
index.rst page does not help much in grasping what the content is supposed
to be.
Rename those sections to clarify their content, especially when reading
the index page.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Use the proper ACK and NACK naming from the I2C specification instead of
"accept" and "reverse accept".
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
These colons are not needed: the columns already nicely separate the
symbols from their description. They are also inconsistently preceded by
whitespace.
Remove the colons completely to simplify and clean up.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
In I2C there is no such thing as a "start bit" or a "stop bit". Use the
proper naming: "start condition" and "stop condition".
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
This clarifies these are functions and adds a hyperlink to the function
documentation.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Uppercase "I2C" is used almost everywhere in the docs, but the lowercase
version "i2c" is used somewhere. Use the uppercase form consistently.
Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@lucaceresoli.net>
Acked-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Convert each file at I2C subsystem, renaming them to .rst and
adding to the driver-api book.
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
