2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-19 02:34:01 +08:00
Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jeff Garzik
3bf743e7c8 [SCSI] use {sdev,scmd,starget,shost}_printk in generic code
rejections fixed and
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-10-28 20:52:11 -05:00
Jayachandran C
80d904c43b [SCSI] sr: remove dead code
This patch fixes an issue reported in drivers/scsi/sr.c by Coverity

Error reported: Pointer returned from "scsi_cd" is never used

Patch description:
 Remove the scsi_cd() call as it does not have any effect.

Signed-off-by: Jayachandran C. <c.jayachandran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-10-28 17:42:31 -05:00
James Bottomley
9ccfc756a7 [SCSI] move the mid-layer printk's over to shost/starget/sdev_printk
This should eliminate (at least in the mid layer) to make numeric
assumptions about any of the enumeration variables.  As a side effect,
it will also make all the messages consistent and line us up nicely for
the error logging strategy (if it ever shows itself again).

Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-10-28 14:23:02 -05:00
Timothy Thelin
186d330e68 [SCSI] scsi: sd, sr, st, and scsi_lib all fail to copy cmd_len to new cmd
This fixes an issue in scsi command initialization from a request
where sd, sr, st, and scsi_lib all fail to copy the request's
cmd_len to the scsi command's cmd_len field.

Signed-off-by: Timothy Thelin <timothy.thelin@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-09-14 16:54:12 -04:00
James Bottomley
ba482ef4b1 Merge by hand (conflicts in sr.c) 2005-08-28 11:40:00 -05:00
James Bottomley
820732b501 [SCSI] convert sr to scsi_execute_req
This follows almost the identical model to sd, except that there's one
ioctl which returns raw sense data, so it had to use scsi_execute()
instead.

Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-08-28 11:34:07 -05:00
James Bottomley
1cf72699c1 [SCSI] convert the remaining mid-layer pieces to scsi_execute_req
After this, we just have some drivers, all the ULDs and the SPI
transport class using scsi_wait_req().

Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-08-28 11:27:01 -05:00
Pete Zaitcev
51490c89f9 [SCSI] sr.c: Fix getting wrong size
Here's the problem. Try to do this on 2.6.12:
- Kill udev and HAL
- Insert a CD-ROM into a SCSI or USB CD-ROM drive
- Run dd if=/dev/scd0
- cat /sys/block/sr0/size
- Eject the CD, insert a different one
- Run dd if=/dev/scd0
This is likely to do "access beyond the end of device", if you let it
- cat /sys/block/sr0/size
This shows the size of a previous CD, even though dd was supposed
to revalidate the device.
- Run dd if=/dev/scd0
The second run of dd works correctly!

The bug was introduced in 2.5.31, when Al fixes the recursive opens
in partitioning. Before, the code worked like this:
- Block layer called cdrom_open directly
- cdrom_open called sr_open
- sr_open called check_disk_change
- check_disk_change called sr_media_change
- sr_media_change did cd->needs_disk_change=1
- before returning sr_open tested cd->needs_disk_change
  and called get_sector_size.

In 2.6.12, the check_disk_change is called from cdrom_open only. Thus:
- Block layer calls sr_bd_open
- sr_bd_open calls cdrom_open
- cdrom_open calls sr_open
- sr_open tests cd->needs_disk_change, which wasn't set yet; returns
- cdrom_open calls check_disk_change
- check_disk_change calls sr_media_change
- sr_media_change does cd->needs_disk_change=1, but nobody cares

Acked by: Alexander Viro <aviro@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
2005-08-28 11:14:12 -05:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00