As we already have a list of cpufreq_cooling_devices now, lets use it instead of
a local counter.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
We don't use get_property() to find max levels anymore as it is done at boot
now. So, don't support GET_MAXL in get_property().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
CPU frequency tables don't update after the driver is registered and so we don't
need to iterate over them to find total number of states every time
cpufreq_get_max_state() is called. Do it once at boot time.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
get_cpu_frequency() isn't doing much by itself, just calling get_property(). And
so this wrapper isn't required at all. Get rid of it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_apply_cooling() has a single caller, cpufreq_set_cur_state() and
cpufreq_set_cur_state() is an unnecessary wrapper over cpufreq_apply_cooling().
Get rid of it by merging both routines.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
There is no point checking for validity of 'cpufreq_val' from
cpufreq_thermal_notifier() every time the routine is called. Its guaranteed to
be 0 on the first call but will be valid otherwise.
Lets update it once while the device registers.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This makes life easy and bug free. And is scalable for future resource
allocations.
Acked-by: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Because get_cpu_frequency() has returned a valid frequency, it means that the
cpufreq policy is surely valid and so no point checking that again with
is_cpufreq_valid(). Get rid of the routine as well as there are no more users.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
All CPUs present in 'allowed_cpus' share the same 'struct cpufreq_policy'
structure and so calling cpufreq_update_policy() for each of them doesn't make
sense.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
In __cpufreq_cooling_register() we try to match min/max frequencies for all CPUs
passed in 'clip_cpus' mask. This mask is the cpumask of cpus where the frequency
constraints will be applied.
Same frequency constraint can be applied only to the CPUs belonging to the same
cluster (i.e. CPUs sharing clock line). For all such CPUs we have a single
'struct cpufreq_policy' structure managing them and so getting policies for all
CPUs wouldn't make any sense as they will all return the same pointer.
So, remove this useless check of checking min/max for all CPUs. Also update doc
comment to make this more obvious that clip_cpus should be same as
policy->related_cpus.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
We aren't supposed to return our own error type here. Return what we got.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
ret is initialized before it is used, so no need to set it to 0 in its declaration.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
It will be overwritten soon with return value of kzalloc().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This wasn't explained well anywhere and should be clearly specified. Lets add a
top level comment for this.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cooling_cpufreq_lock isn't used to protect this structure and so the comment
over it is outdated. Fix it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
cpufreq_cooling_register() expects mask of all the CPUs where frequency
constraint is applicable.
This platform has more than one CPU to which these constraints will apply and so
passing mask of only CPU0 wouldn't be sufficient. Also, this platform has a
single cluster of CPUs and the constraint applies to all CPUs.
If CPU0 is hoplugged out then we may face strange BUGs as cpu_cooling framework
isn't aware of any siblings sharing clock line.
Fix it by passing cpu_present_mask to cpufreq_cooling_register().
Cc: Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zhang@linaro.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
In this patch, the cpu_cooling code checks for the usability of cpufreq
layer before proceeding with the CPU cooling device registration. The
main reason is: CPU cooling device is not usable if cpufreq cannot
switch frequencies.
Similar checks are spread in thermal drivers. Thus, the advantage now
is to have the check in a single place: cpu cooling device registration.
For this reason, this patch also updates the existing drivers that
depend on CPU cooling to simply propagate the error code of the cpu
cooling registration call. Therefore, in case cpufreq is not ready, the
thermal drivers will still return -EPROBE_DEFER, in an attempt to try
again when cpufreq layer gets ready.
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
The functions cpufreq_cooling_unregister() and thermal_zone_device_unregister()
test whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately.
Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Prevents build warning:
st_thermal.c:278:12:
warning: ‘st_thermal_suspend’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
st_thermal.c:286:12:
warning: ‘st_thermal_resume’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
Acked-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Existing code updates cupfreq policy only while executing
cpufreq_apply_cooling() function (i.e. when notify_device != NOTIFY_INVALID).
It doesn't apply constraints when cpufreq policy update happens from any other
place but it should update the cpufreq policy with thermal constraints every
time when there is a cpufreq policy update, to keep state of
cpufreq_cooling_device and max_feq of cpufreq policy in sync. For instance
while resuming cpufreq updates cpufreq_policy and it restores default
policy->usr_policy values irrespective of cooling device's cpufreq_state since
notification gets missed because (notify_device == NOTIFY_INVALID).
Another problem, is that userspace is able to change max_freq irrespective of
cooling device's state, as notification gets missed.
This patch modifies code to maintain a global cpufreq_dev_list and applies
constraints of all matching cooling devices for policy's cpu when there is any
policy update(ends up applying the lowest max_freq among the matching cpu
cooling devices).
This patch also removes redundant check (max_freq > policy->user_policy.max),
as cpufreq framework takes care of user_policy constraints already where ever
required, otherwise its causing an issue while increasing max_freq in normal
scenerio as it restores max_freq with policy->user_policy.max which is old
(smaller) value.
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
imx_get_temp might be called before the sensor clock is prepared
thus resulting in a timeout of the first attempt to read temp:
thermal thermal_zone0: failed to read out thermal zone 0
Happened to me on a Utilite Standard with IMX6 Dual SoC.
Reason is that in imx_thermal_probe thermal_zone_device_register
is called before the sensor clock is prepared.
thermal_zone_device_register however calls
thermal_zone_device_update which eventually calls imx_get_temp.
Fix this by preparing the clock before calling
thermal_zone_device_register.
Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <heiner.kallweit@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
In exynos5260_tmu_registers tmu_ctrl entry is erroneously
assigned twice. The second assignment (to EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL1
define which represents 0x24 value) overrides the first one
(to EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL define which represents 0x20 value)
which results in the wrong (according to the Exynos5260 SoC
documentation that I have) offset being used for TMU_CONTROL
register. Fix it by removing the wrong assignment and then
remove no longer used EXYNOS_TMU_REG_CONTROL1 define.
Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
thermal driver should be regisetered after cpufreq driver has
been registered and probed. Doing so is to make sure that thermal
driver can get the max cpu cooling states correctly when calling
get_property.
Signed-off-by: Bai Ping <b51503@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Thermal hysteresis represents a temperature difference.
But the original code treats it as a temperature value,
Convert it from tenths of degree Kelvin to Milli-Celsius
by deducing 273200. This is not right.
Kelvin and Celsius have same degree size. From temperature
difference view, the conversion between tenths of degree
Kelvin unit and Milli-Celsius unit is just to multiply 100.
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
result is always zero when comes here.
Signed-off-by: Yao Dongdong <yaodongdong@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* Factor out code for clearing raised IRQs from exynos_tmu_work() to
exynos_tmu_clear_irqs().
* Add a comment about documentation bugs to exynos_tmu_clear_irqs().
[ The documentation for Exynos3250, Exynos4412, Exynos5250 and
Exynos5260 incorrectly states that INTCLEAR register has
a different placing of bits responsible for FALL IRQs than
INTSTAT register. Exynos5420 and Exynos5440 documentation is
correct (Exynos4210 doesn't support FALL IRQs at all). ]
* Use exynos_tmu_clear_irqs() in exynos_tmu_initialize() instead
of open-coded code trying to clear IRQs according to predefined
masks. After this change exynos_tmu_initialize() just clears
IRQs that are raised like it is already done in exynos_tmu_work().
As a nice side-effect the code now uses the correct offset
(16 instead of 12) for bits responsible for clearing FALL IRQs
in INTCLEAR register on Exynos3250, Exynos4412 and Exynos5250.
* Remove no longer needed intclr_rise_[mask,shift] and
intclr_fall_[mask,shift] fields from struct exynos_tmu_registers.
* Remove no longer needed defines.
This patch has been tested on Exynos4412 and Exynos5420 SoCs.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Here on function return all temporarily used device nodes shall
decrement their usage counter. The problems are found with device
nodes allocated by for_each_child_of_node(), of_parse_phandle()
and of_find_node_by_name(), fix all problems at once.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This patch add support for TRIM_RELOAD feature at Exynos3250. The TMu of
Exynos3250 has two TRIMINFO_CON register and must need to set RELOAD bit
before reading TRIMINFO register.
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
This patch support many TRIMINFO_CTRL registers if specific Exynos SoC
has one more TRIMINFO_CTRL registers. Also this patch uses proper 'RELOAD'
shift/mask bit operation to set RELOAD feature instead of static value.
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Currently these SoCs claim TRIM_RELOAD support but don't have
triminfo_ctrl register address defined in their struct
exynos_tmu_registers entries. This causes incorrect write of
value "1" to data->base + 0x00 address (which happens to be
TRIMINFO register). Additionally according to the documentation
that I have neither Exynos5260 nor Exynos5420 support/require
TRIM_RELOAD feature. Thus fix the aforementioned issue by
removing TMU_SUPPORT_TRIM_RELOAD flag for both Exynos5260 and
Exynos5420.
Cc: Naveen Krishna Chatradhi <ch.naveen@samsung.com>
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
There is no need for abstracting configuration for registers that
are identical on all SoC types.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
pdata->reference_voltage and pdata->gain are always defined
to non-zero values so remove the redundant checks from
exynos_tmu_control().
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Cache number of non-hardware trigger levels in a new pdata field
(non_hw_trigger_levels) and convert code in exynos_tmu_initialize()
accordingly.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
* Remove dead temp check from temp_to_code() (this function users
in exynos_tmu_initialize() always pass correct temperatures and
exynos_tmu_set_emulation() returns early for EXYNOS4210 because
TMU_SUPPORT_EMULATION flag is not set on this SoC).
* Move temp_code check from code_to_temp() to exynos_tmu_read()
(code_to_temp() only user).
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Remove runtime checks for negative return values of temp_to_code()
from exynos_tmu_initialize().
The current level temperature data hardcoded in pdata will never
cause a negative temp_to_code() return values and checking itself
is not proper. The checks in question are done at runtime in
a production code for data that is hardcoded inside driver during
development time and later it doesn't change. Such data should
be verified during development and review time (i.e. by a script
parsing relevant data from exynos_tmu_data.c, one can also argue
that verification to be done is so simple that the review by
a maintainer should be enough).
Theres should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Remove runtime checks for pdata sanity from exynos_tmu_initialize().
The current values hardcoded in pdata will never trigger the checks
and checking itself is not proper. The checks in question are done
at runtime in a production code for data that is hardcoded inside
driver during development time and later it doesn't change. Such
data should be verified during development and review time (i.e. by
a script parsing relevant data from exynos_tmu_data.c, one can also
argue that verification to be done is so simple that the review by
a maintainer should be enough).
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
The commit 1928457 ("thermal: exynos: Add hardware mode thermal
calibration support") has added HW_MODE feature but it has never
been enabled. As such it has been a dead code for over a year
now and should be removed from the kernel.
We don't keep the unused/untested features in the kernel just
in case that some future hardware might need it. Such code has
a real maintainance cost (all other code changes have to take
the dead code into account) and usually makes future changes
more difficult, not easier (i.e. recent additions of Exynos5420
SoC and Exynos5260 SoC thermal support has not made use of any
of the driver's currently unused/untested features, moreover
the recently added code is more complex than needed because of
the existing dead code). Also all removed dead code is still
accessible in the kernel git repository and can be easily
brought back if/when needed.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Remove unused / write-only entries from struct exynos_tmu_registers.
Then remove unused defines while at it.
We don't keep the unused/untested features in the kernel just
in case that some future hardware might need it. Such code has
a real maintainance cost (all other code changes have to take
the dead code into account) and usually makes future changes
more difficult, not easier (i.e. recent additions of Exynos5420
SoC and Exynos5260 SoC thermal support has not made use of any
of the driver's currently unused/untested features, moreover
the recently added code is more complex than needed because of
the existing dead code). Also all removed dead code is still
accessible in the kernel git repository and can be easily
brought back if/when needed.
There should be no functional changes caused by this patch.
Signed-off-by: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com>
Acked-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@samsung.com>
Tested-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Pull thermal management updates from Zhang Rui:
"Sorry that I missed the merge window as there is a bug found in the
last minute, and I have to fix it and wait for the code to be tested
in linux-next tree for a few days. Now the buggy patch has been
dropped entirely from my next branch. Thus I hope those changes can
still be merged in 3.18-rc2 as most of them are platform thermal
driver changes.
Specifics:
- introduce ACPI INT340X thermal drivers.
Newer laptops and tablets may have thermal sensors and other
devices with thermal control capabilities that are exposed for the
OS to use via the ACPI INT340x device objects. Several drivers are
introduced to expose the temperature information and cooling
ability from these objects to user-space via the normal thermal
framework.
From: Lu Aaron, Lan Tianyu, Jacob Pan and Zhang Rui.
- introduce a new thermal governor, which just uses a hysteresis to
switch abruptly on/off a cooling device. This governor can be used
to control certain fan devices that can not be throttled but just
switched on or off. From: Peter Feuerer.
- introduce support for some new thermal interrupt functions on
i.MX6SX, in IMX thermal driver. From: Anson, Huang.
- introduce tracing support on thermal framework. From: Punit
Agrawal.
- small fixes in OF thermal and thermal step_wise governor"
* 'next' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rzhang/linux: (25 commits)
Thermal: int340x thermal: select ACPI fan driver
Thermal: int3400_thermal: use acpi_thermal_rel parsing APIs
Thermal: int340x_thermal: expose acpi thermal relationship tables
Thermal: introduce int3403 thermal driver
Thermal: introduce INT3402 thermal driver
Thermal: move the KELVIN_TO_MILLICELSIUS macro to thermal.h
ACPI / Fan: support INT3404 thermal device
ACPI / Fan: add ACPI 4.0 style fan support
ACPI / fan: convert to platform driver
ACPI / fan: use acpi_device_xxx_power instead of acpi_bus equivelant
ACPI / fan: remove no need check for device pointer
ACPI / fan: remove unused macro
Thermal: int3400 thermal: register to thermal framework
Thermal: int3400 thermal: add capability to detect supporting UUIDs
Thermal: introduce int3400 thermal driver
ACPI: add ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE support to acpi_extract_package()
ACPI: make acpi_create_platform_device() an external API
thermal: step_wise: fix: Prevent from binary overflow when trend is dropping
ACPI: introduce ACPI int340x thermal scan handler
thermal: Added Bang-bang thermal governor
...
we share the same driver for both ACPI predefined Fan device
and INT3404 Fan device, thus we should select the ACPI Fan
driver when int340x thermal drivers are enabeld.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
The kernel used to contain two functions for length-delimited,
case-insensitive string comparison, strnicmp with correct semantics and
a slightly buggy strncasecmp. The latter is the POSIX name, so strnicmp
was renamed to strncasecmp, and strnicmp made into a wrapper for the new
strncasecmp to avoid breaking existing users.
To allow the compat wrapper strnicmp to be removed at some point in the
future, and to avoid the extra indirection cost, do
s/strnicmp/strncasecmp/g.
Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Acked-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
ACPI _TRT and _ART parsing code has been moved to acpi_thermal_rel such
that it can be used by other devices in the future. Use the parsing APIs
in acpi_thermal_rel.c instead.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
ACPI 4.0 introduced two thermal relationship tables via _ART
(active cooling) and _TRT (passive cooling) objects. These
tables contain many to many relationships among thermal sensors
and cooling devices.
This patch parses _ART and _TRT and makes the result available to
the userspace via an misc device interface. At the same time,
kernel drivers can also request parsing results from internal
kernel APIs.
The results include source and target devices, influence, and
sampling rate in case of _TRT. For _ART, the result shows source
device, target device, and weight percentage.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
ACPI INT3403 device object can be used to retrieve temperature date
from temperature sensors present in the system, and to expose
device' performance control.
The previous INT3403 thermal driver supports temperature reporting only,
thus remove it and introduce this new & enhanced one.
Signed-off-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
