This patch adds the /sys/module/libfc/parameters/debug_logging
file to sysfs as a module parameter. It accepts an integer
bitmask for logging. Currently it supports:
bit
LSB 0 = general libfc debugging
1 = lport debugging
2 = disc debugging
3 = rport debugging
4 = fcp debugging
5 = EM debugging
6 = exch/seq debugging
7 = scsi logging (mostly error handling)
the other bits are not used at this time.
The patch converts all of the libfc source files to use
these new macros and removes the old FC_DBG macro.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
When a sequence is received in response to an exchange we issued previously,
we should check to see if the exchange has completed. If yes, the sequence
should be discarded. Since the exchange might be still in the completion
process, it should be untouched.
Signed-off-by: Steve Ma <steve.ma@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
When LLD supports direct data placement (ddp) for large receive of an scsi
i/o coming into fc_fcp, we call into libfc_function_template's ddp_setup()
to prepare for a ddp of large receive for this read I/O. When I/O is complete,
we call the corresponding ddp_done() to get the length of data ddped as well
as to let LLD do clean up.
fc_fcp_ddp_setup()/fc_fcp_ddp_done() are added to setup and complete a ddped
read I/O described by the given fc_fcp_pkt. They would call into corresponding
ddp_setup/ddp_done implemented by the fcoe layer. Eventually, fcoe layer calls
into LLD's ddp_setup/ddp_done provided through net_device
Signed-off-by: Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
!ep->esb_stat is either 1 or 0, and the rightmost bit of ESB_ST_COMPLETE is
always 0, making the result of !ep->esb_stat & ESB_ST_COMPLETE always 0.
Thus parentheses around the argument to ! seem needed.
The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
// <smpl>
@@ expression E; constant C; @@
(
!E & !C
|
- !E & C
+ !(E & C)
)
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
We shouldn't be altering inbound frames.
Signed-off-by: Yi Zou <yi.zou@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
1) There were a few functions with a strange layout, i.e. all
arguments on the second line, when not necessary.
Where ever possible I moved the return value to the same line
as the function name. However, when the line was too long
to have a single argument on the same line I moved the
return value to above line. For example:
<short return> <function name>(<arg 1>, <arg2>)
and
<very long return value>
<function name>(<arg1>,
<arg2>)
2) Removed one extra whitespace line
3) Fixed two typos
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
This allows any rport ELS to retry on LS_RJT.
The rport error handling would only retry on resource allocation failures
and exchange timeouts. I have a target that will occasionally reject PLOGI
when we do a quick LOGO/PLOGI. When a critical ELS was rejected, libfc would
fail silently leaving the rport in a dead state.
The retry count and delay are managed by fc_rport_error_retry. If the retry
count is exceeded fc_rport_error will be called. When retrying is not the
correct course of action, fc_rport_error can be called directly.
Signed-off-by: Chris Leech <christopher.leech@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
The fc_seq_start_next grabs ep->ex_lock but this lock was already held here,
so instead called fc_seq_start_next_locked to avoid soft lockup.
Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cleanup exchange held due to RRQ when RRQ exch times out, in this case the
ABTS is already done causing RRQ req therefore proceeding with cleanup in
fc_exch_rrq_resp should be okay to restore exch resource.
Signed-off-by: Vasu Dev <vasu.dev@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
fc_exch_mgr structure is private to fc_exch.c. To export exch_mgr_reset to
transport, transport needs access to the exch manager. Change
exch_mgr_reset to use lport param which is the shared structure between
libFC and transport.
Alternatively, fc_exch_mgr definition can be moved to libfc.h so that lport
can be accessed from mp*.
Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Joglekar <abjoglek@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
libFC is composed of 4 blocks supported by an exchange manager
and a framing library. The upper 4 layers are fc_lport, fc_disc,
fc_rport and fc_fcp. A LLD that uses libfc could choose to
either use libfc's block, or using the transport template
defined in libfc.h, override one or more blocks with its own
implementation.
The EM (Exchange Manager) manages exhcanges/sequences for all
commands- ELS, CT and FCP.
The framing library frames ELS and CT commands.
The fc_lport block manages the library's representation of the
host's FC enabled ports.
The fc_disc block manages discovery of targets as well as
handling changes that occur in the FC fabric (via. RSCN events).
The fc_rport block manages the library's representation of other
entities in the FC fabric. Currently the library uses this block
for targets, its peer when in point-to-point mode and the
directory server, but can be extended for other entities if
needed.
The fc_fcp block interacts with the scsi-ml and handles all
I/O.
Signed-off-by: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
[jejb: added include of delay.h to fix ppc64 compile prob spotted by sfr]
Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
