2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-22 20:23:57 +08:00
Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Kulikov Vasiliy
4e344b1cc5 PCI: use for_each_pci_dev()
Use for_each_pci_dev() to simplify the code.

Signed-off-by: Kulikov Vasiliy <segooon@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2010-07-30 09:47:22 -07:00
Bjorn Helgaas
80ccba1186 PCI: use dev_printk when possible
Convert printks to use dev_printk().

I converted pr_debug() to dev_dbg().  Both use KERN_DEBUG and are enabled
only when DEBUG is defined.

I converted printk(KERN_DEBUG) to dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG), not to dev_dbg(),
because dev_dbg() is only enabled when DEBUG is defined.

I converted DBG(KERN_INFO) (only in setup-bus.c) to dev_info().  The DBG()
name makes it sound like debug, but it's been enabled forever, so dev_info()
preserves the previous behavior.

I tried to make the resource assignment formats more consistent, e.g.,
  "BAR %d: got res [%#llx-%#llx] bus [%#llx-%#llx] flags %#lx\n"
instead of sometimes using "start-end" and sometimes using "size@start".
I'm not attached to one or the other; I'd just like them consistent.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
2008-06-25 16:05:13 -07:00
Greg Kroah-Hartman
19c38de88a kobjects: fix up improper use of the kobject name field
A number of different drivers incorrect access the kobject name field
directly.  This is not correct as the name might not be in the array.
Use the proper accessor function instead.
2007-10-12 14:51:02 -07:00
Andreas Block
691cd0c2ee PCI: PCI devices get assigned redundant IRQs
I'm currently working on a port to a CPCI board with a MPC5200.  When
testing the PCI interrupt routing, I discovered the following: Even devices
which don't use interrupts (-> PCI Spec.: Interrupt Pin Register is zero),
get an interrupt assigned (this is at least true for most of the
PPC-targets I looked at).

The cause is pretty obvious in drivers/pci/setup-irq.c.  I guess at least
in an ideal world with correctly designed hardware, the code should rather
look as in the patch below.

Of course it doesn't hurt anybody to have an unuseable IRQ assigned to a
PCI-to-PCI-bridge (or something alike), but to me it seems a bit strange. 
Please correct me, if I'm mislead.

The patch below is tested on the above mentioned CPCI-MPC5200 board and is
compiler tested with the latest git-repository kernel on x86.

Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
2007-02-16 15:30:10 -08:00
Linus Torvalds
1da177e4c3 Linux-2.6.12-rc2
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!
2005-04-16 15:20:36 -07:00