This patch also removes setting cpu_present_mask as platforms should
only re-initialize it in smp_prepare_cpus() if present != possible.
Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <sudeep.karkadanagesha@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
During boot, Linux initiates a clean-invalidate operation only, resulting
in faulty data to be written to the memory system during resume.
Therefore invalidate the L1 in the secondary boot path to avoid these
issues.
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
The generic code already checks that the CPU being requested is legal if
the cpu possible/present masks are set correctly.
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
The __cpuinit type of throwaway sections might have made sense
some time ago when RAM was more constrained, but now the savings
do not offset the cost and complications. For example, the fix in
commit 5e427ec2d0 ("x86: Fix bit corruption at CPU resume time")
is a good example of the nasty type of bugs that can be created
with improper use of the various __init prefixes.
After a discussion on LKML[1] it was decided that cpuinit should go
the way of devinit and be phased out. Once all the users are gone,
we can then finally remove the macros themselves from linux/init.h.
Note that some harmless section mismatch warnings may result, since
notify_cpu_starting() and cpu_up() are arch independent (kernel/cpu.c)
and are flagged as __cpuinit -- so if we remove the __cpuinit from
the arch specific callers, we will also get section mismatch warnings.
As an intermediate step, we intend to turn the linux/init.h cpuinit
related content into no-ops as early as possible, since that will get
rid of these warnings. In any case, they are temporary and harmless.
This removes all the ARM uses of the __cpuinit macros from C code,
and all __CPUINIT from assembly code. It also had two ".previous"
section statements that were paired off against __CPUINIT
(aka .section ".cpuinit.text") that also get removed here.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/20/589
Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Both zynq and shmobile have conflicts against the gic cleanup
series, resolved here.
Conflicts:
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/smp-emev2.c
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/smp-r8a7779.c
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/smp-sh73a0.c
arch/arm/mach-zynq/platsmp.c
drivers/gpio/gpio-pl061.c
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Zynq is dual core Cortex A9 which starts always
at zero. Using simple trampoline ensure long jump
to secondary_startup code.
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Trumtrar <s.trumtrar@pengutronix.de>
