In preparation for combined pquota/gquota support, for the sake
of readability, do some code cleanup surrounding the affected
code.
Signed-off-by: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Adding an extended attribute to a symbolic link can force that
link to an remote extent. xfs_inactive() incorrectly assumes
that any symbolic link small enough to be in the inode core
is incore, resulting in the remote extent to not be removed.
xfs_ifree() will assert on presence of this leaked remote extent.
Signed-off-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
When CRCs are enabled, the number of blocks needed to hold a remote
symlink on a 1k block size filesystem may be 2 instead of 1. The
transaction reservation for the allocated blocks was not taking this
into account and only allocating one block. Hence when trying to
read or invalidate such symlinks, we are mapping a hole where there
should be a block and things go bad at that point.
Fix the reservation to use the correct block count, clean up the
block count calculation similar to the remote attribute calculation,
and add a debug guard to detect when we don't write the entire
symlink to disk.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Add a header to the remote symlink block, containing location and
owner information, as well as CRCs and LSN fields. This requires
verifiers to be added to the remote symlink buffers for CRC enabled
filesystems.
This also fixes a bug reading multiple block symlinks, where the second
block overwrites the first block when copying out the link name.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
The symlink code is about to get more complicated when CRCs are
added for remote symlink blocks. The symlink management code is
mostly self contained, so move it to it's own files so that all the
new code and the existing symlink code will not be intermingled
with other unrelated code.
Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
