2
0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-22 12:14:01 +08:00
Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Jean Delvare
5694f8a888 i2c: Update the FSF address
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
2012-03-26 21:47:19 +02:00
Rodolfo Giometti
f18c41daea i2c: Use rwsem instead of mutex for board info
By using rwsem we can easily manage recursive calls of
i2c_scan_static_board_info() function without breaking the locking.

Signed-off-by: Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@linux.it>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
2009-06-19 16:58:20 +02:00
David Brownell
9c1600eda4 i2c: Add i2c_board_info and i2c_new_device()
This provides partial support for new-style I2C driver binding.  It builds
on "struct i2c_board_info" declarations that identify I2C devices on a given
board.  This is needed on systems with I2C devices that can't be fully probed
and/or autoconfigured, such as many embedded Linux configurations where the
way a given I2C device is wired may affect how it must be used.

There are two models for declaring such devices:

 * LATE -- using a public function i2c_new_device().  This lets modules
   declare I2C devices found *AFTER* a given I2C adapter becomes available.
   
   For example, a PCI card could create adapters giving access to utility
   chips on that card, and this would be used to associate those chips with
   those adapters.

 * EARLY -- from arch_initcall() level code, using a non-exported function
   i2c_register_board_info().  This copies the declarations *BEFORE* such
   an i2c_adapter becomes available, arranging that i2c_new_device() will
   be called later when i2c-core registers the relevant i2c_adapter.

   For example, arch/.../.../board-*.c files would declare the I2C devices
   along with their platform data, and I2C devices would behave much like
   PNPACPI devices.  (That is, both enumerate from board-specific tables.)

To match the exported i2c_new_device(), the previously-private function
i2c_unregister_device() is now exported.

Pending later patches using these new APIs, this is effectively a NOP.

Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
2007-05-01 23:26:31 +02:00