mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-11-20 16:46:23 +08:00
AFS: fix file locking
Fix file locking for AFS: (*) Start the lock manager thread under a mutex to avoid a race. (*) Made the locking non-fair: New readlocks will jump pending writelocks if there's a readlock currently granted on a file. This makes the behaviour similar to Linux's VFS locking. Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b34bd06e48
commit
ff8e210a95
@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ static void afs_fl_copy_lock(struct file_lock *new, struct file_lock *fl);
|
||||
static void afs_fl_release_private(struct file_lock *fl);
|
||||
|
||||
static struct workqueue_struct *afs_lock_manager;
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(afs_lock_manager_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
static struct file_lock_operations afs_lock_ops = {
|
||||
.fl_copy_lock = afs_fl_copy_lock,
|
||||
@ -30,12 +31,20 @@ static struct file_lock_operations afs_lock_ops = {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int afs_init_lock_manager(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = 0;
|
||||
if (!afs_lock_manager) {
|
||||
afs_lock_manager = create_singlethread_workqueue("kafs_lockd");
|
||||
mutex_lock(&afs_lock_manager_mutex);
|
||||
if (!afs_lock_manager) {
|
||||
afs_lock_manager =
|
||||
create_singlethread_workqueue("kafs_lockd");
|
||||
if (!afs_lock_manager)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
ret = -ENOMEM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&afs_lock_manager_mutex);
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -67,6 +76,29 @@ static void afs_schedule_lock_extension(struct afs_vnode *vnode)
|
||||
AFS_LOCKWAIT * HZ / 2);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* grant one or more locks (readlocks are allowed to jump the queue if the
|
||||
* first lock in the queue is itself a readlock)
|
||||
* - the caller must hold the vnode lock
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void afs_grant_locks(struct afs_vnode *vnode, struct file_lock *fl)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct file_lock *p, *_p;
|
||||
|
||||
list_move_tail(&fl->fl_u.afs.link, &vnode->granted_locks);
|
||||
if (fl->fl_type == F_RDLCK) {
|
||||
list_for_each_entry_safe(p, _p, &vnode->pending_locks,
|
||||
fl_u.afs.link) {
|
||||
if (p->fl_type == F_RDLCK) {
|
||||
p->fl_u.afs.state = AFS_LOCK_GRANTED;
|
||||
list_move_tail(&p->fl_u.afs.link,
|
||||
&vnode->granted_locks);
|
||||
wake_up(&p->fl_wait);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* do work for a lock, including:
|
||||
* - probing for a lock we're waiting on but didn't get immediately
|
||||
@ -172,8 +204,7 @@ void afs_lock_work(struct work_struct *work)
|
||||
struct file_lock, fl_u.afs.link) == fl) {
|
||||
fl->fl_u.afs.state = ret;
|
||||
if (ret == AFS_LOCK_GRANTED)
|
||||
list_move_tail(&fl->fl_u.afs.link,
|
||||
&vnode->granted_locks);
|
||||
afs_grant_locks(vnode, fl);
|
||||
else
|
||||
list_del_init(&fl->fl_u.afs.link);
|
||||
wake_up(&fl->fl_wait);
|
||||
@ -258,10 +289,23 @@ static int afs_do_setlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl)
|
||||
|
||||
spin_lock(&vnode->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
if (list_empty(&vnode->pending_locks)) {
|
||||
/* if there's no-one else with a lock on this vnode, then we
|
||||
* need to ask the server for a lock */
|
||||
if (list_empty(&vnode->granted_locks)) {
|
||||
/* if we've already got a readlock on the server then we can instantly
|
||||
* grant another readlock, irrespective of whether there are any
|
||||
* pending writelocks */
|
||||
if (type == AFS_LOCK_READ &&
|
||||
vnode->flags & (1 << AFS_VNODE_READLOCKED)) {
|
||||
_debug("instant readlock");
|
||||
ASSERTCMP(vnode->flags &
|
||||
((1 << AFS_VNODE_LOCKING) |
|
||||
(1 << AFS_VNODE_WRITELOCKED)), ==, 0);
|
||||
ASSERT(!list_empty(&vnode->granted_locks));
|
||||
goto sharing_existing_lock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* if there's no-one else with a lock on this vnode, then we need to
|
||||
* ask the server for a lock */
|
||||
if (list_empty(&vnode->pending_locks) &&
|
||||
list_empty(&vnode->granted_locks)) {
|
||||
_debug("not locked");
|
||||
ASSERTCMP(vnode->flags &
|
||||
((1 << AFS_VNODE_LOCKING) |
|
||||
@ -275,8 +319,10 @@ static int afs_do_setlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl)
|
||||
clear_bit(AFS_VNODE_LOCKING, &vnode->flags);
|
||||
switch (ret) {
|
||||
case 0:
|
||||
_debug("acquired");
|
||||
goto acquired_server_lock;
|
||||
case -EWOULDBLOCK:
|
||||
_debug("would block");
|
||||
spin_lock(&vnode->lock);
|
||||
ASSERT(list_empty(&vnode->granted_locks));
|
||||
ASSERTCMP(vnode->pending_locks.next, ==,
|
||||
@ -290,20 +336,6 @@ static int afs_do_setlk(struct file *file, struct file_lock *fl)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* if we've already got a readlock on the server and no waiting
|
||||
* writelocks, then we might be able to instantly grant another
|
||||
* readlock */
|
||||
if (type == AFS_LOCK_READ &&
|
||||
vnode->flags & (1 << AFS_VNODE_READLOCKED)) {
|
||||
_debug("instant readlock");
|
||||
ASSERTCMP(vnode->flags &
|
||||
((1 << AFS_VNODE_LOCKING) |
|
||||
(1 << AFS_VNODE_WRITELOCKED)), ==, 0);
|
||||
ASSERT(!list_empty(&vnode->granted_locks));
|
||||
goto sharing_existing_lock;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* otherwise, we need to wait for a local lock to become available */
|
||||
_debug("wait local");
|
||||
list_add_tail(&fl->fl_u.afs.link, &vnode->pending_locks);
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user