renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2025-01-14 16:44:29 +08:00
Code

selftests: arm64: Fix and enable test for setting current VL in vec-syscfg

Browse Source 
We had some test code for verifying that we can write the current VL via
the prctl() interface but the condition for the test was inverted which
wasn't noticed as it was never actually hooked up to the array of tests
we execute. Fix this.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929151925.9601-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Mark Brown 2021-09-29 16:19:24 +01:00 committed by Will Deacon
parent 4caf339c03
commit e42391150e
1 changed files with 4 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/vec-syscfg.c
View File

@ -329,12 +329,9 @@ static void prctl_set_same(struct vec_data *data)
return;
}
if (cur_vl != data->rdvl())
ksft_test_result_pass("%s current VL is %d\n",
data->name, ret);
else
ksft_test_result_fail("%s prctl() VL %d but RDVL is %d\n",
data->name, ret, data->rdvl());
ksft_test_result(cur_vl == data->rdvl(),
"%s set VL %d and have VL %d\n",
data->name, cur_vl, data->rdvl());
}
/* Can we set a new VL for this process? */
@ -555,6 +552,7 @@ static const test_type tests[] = {
proc_write_max,
prctl_get,
prctl_set_same,
prctl_set,
prctl_set_no_child,
prctl_set_for_child,