mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-20 03:04:01 +08:00
tools/memory-model/Documentation: Put redefinition of rcu-fence into explanation.txt
This patch updates the Linux Kernel Memory Model's explanation.txt
file to incorporate the introduction of the rcu-order relation and
the redefinition of rcu-fence made by commit 15aa25cbf0
("tools/memory-model: Change definition of rcu-fence").
Signed-off-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3321ea1290
commit
ddc82999f0
@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Explanation of the Linux-Kernel Memory Consistency Model
|
||||
19. AND THEN THERE WAS ALPHA
|
||||
20. THE HAPPENS-BEFORE RELATION: hb
|
||||
21. THE PROPAGATES-BEFORE RELATION: pb
|
||||
22. RCU RELATIONS: rcu-link, rcu-gp, rcu-rscsi, rcu-fence, and rb
|
||||
22. RCU RELATIONS: rcu-link, rcu-gp, rcu-rscsi, rcu-order, rcu-fence, and rb
|
||||
23. LOCKING
|
||||
24. ODDS AND ENDS
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1425,8 +1425,8 @@ they execute means that it cannot have cycles. This requirement is
|
||||
the content of the LKMM's "propagation" axiom.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
RCU RELATIONS: rcu-link, rcu-gp, rcu-rscsi, rcu-fence, and rb
|
||||
-------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
RCU RELATIONS: rcu-link, rcu-gp, rcu-rscsi, rcu-order, rcu-fence, and rb
|
||||
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
RCU (Read-Copy-Update) is a powerful synchronization mechanism. It
|
||||
rests on two concepts: grace periods and read-side critical sections.
|
||||
@ -1536,29 +1536,29 @@ Z's CPU before Z begins but doesn't propagate to some other CPU until
|
||||
after X ends.) Similarly, X ->rcu-rscsi Y ->rcu-link Z says that X is
|
||||
the end of a critical section which starts before Z begins.
|
||||
|
||||
The LKMM goes on to define the rcu-fence relation as a sequence of
|
||||
The LKMM goes on to define the rcu-order relation as a sequence of
|
||||
rcu-gp and rcu-rscsi links separated by rcu-link links, in which the
|
||||
number of rcu-gp links is >= the number of rcu-rscsi links. For
|
||||
example:
|
||||
|
||||
X ->rcu-gp Y ->rcu-link Z ->rcu-rscsi T ->rcu-link U ->rcu-gp V
|
||||
|
||||
would imply that X ->rcu-fence V, because this sequence contains two
|
||||
would imply that X ->rcu-order V, because this sequence contains two
|
||||
rcu-gp links and one rcu-rscsi link. (It also implies that
|
||||
X ->rcu-fence T and Z ->rcu-fence V.) On the other hand:
|
||||
X ->rcu-order T and Z ->rcu-order V.) On the other hand:
|
||||
|
||||
X ->rcu-rscsi Y ->rcu-link Z ->rcu-rscsi T ->rcu-link U ->rcu-gp V
|
||||
|
||||
does not imply X ->rcu-fence V, because the sequence contains only
|
||||
does not imply X ->rcu-order V, because the sequence contains only
|
||||
one rcu-gp link but two rcu-rscsi links.
|
||||
|
||||
The rcu-fence relation is important because the Grace Period Guarantee
|
||||
means that rcu-fence acts kind of like a strong fence. In particular,
|
||||
E ->rcu-fence F implies not only that E begins before F ends, but also
|
||||
that any write po-before E will propagate to every CPU before any
|
||||
instruction po-after F can execute. (However, it does not imply that
|
||||
E must execute before F; in fact, each synchronize_rcu() fence event
|
||||
is linked to itself by rcu-fence as a degenerate case.)
|
||||
The rcu-order relation is important because the Grace Period Guarantee
|
||||
means that rcu-order links act kind of like strong fences. In
|
||||
particular, E ->rcu-order F implies not only that E begins before F
|
||||
ends, but also that any write po-before E will propagate to every CPU
|
||||
before any instruction po-after F can execute. (However, it does not
|
||||
imply that E must execute before F; in fact, each synchronize_rcu()
|
||||
fence event is linked to itself by rcu-order as a degenerate case.)
|
||||
|
||||
To prove this in full generality requires some intellectual effort.
|
||||
We'll consider just a very simple case:
|
||||
@ -1585,7 +1585,26 @@ G's CPU before G starts must propagate to every CPU before C starts.
|
||||
In particular, the write propagates to every CPU before F finishes
|
||||
executing and hence before any instruction po-after F can execute.
|
||||
This sort of reasoning can be extended to handle all the situations
|
||||
covered by rcu-fence.
|
||||
covered by rcu-order.
|
||||
|
||||
The rcu-fence relation is a simple extension of rcu-order. While
|
||||
rcu-order only links certain fence events (calls to synchronize_rcu(),
|
||||
rcu_read_lock(), or rcu_read_unlock()), rcu-fence links any events
|
||||
that are separated by an rcu-order link. This is analogous to the way
|
||||
the strong-fence relation links events that are separated by an
|
||||
smp_mb() fence event (as mentioned above, rcu-order links act kind of
|
||||
like strong fences). Written symbolically, X ->rcu-fence Y means
|
||||
there are fence events E and F such that:
|
||||
|
||||
X ->po E ->rcu-order F ->po Y.
|
||||
|
||||
From the discussion above, we see this implies not only that X
|
||||
executes before Y, but also (if X is a store) that X propagates to
|
||||
every CPU before Y executes. Thus rcu-fence is sort of a
|
||||
"super-strong" fence: Unlike the original strong fences (smp_mb() and
|
||||
synchronize_rcu()), rcu-fence is able to link events on different
|
||||
CPUs. (Perhaps this fact should lead us to say that rcu-fence isn't
|
||||
really a fence at all!)
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, the LKMM defines the RCU-before (rb) relation in terms of
|
||||
rcu-fence. This is done in essentially the same way as the pb
|
||||
@ -1596,7 +1615,7 @@ before F, just as E ->pb F does (and for much the same reasons).
|
||||
Putting this all together, the LKMM expresses the Grace Period
|
||||
Guarantee by requiring that the rb relation does not contain a cycle.
|
||||
Equivalently, this "rcu" axiom requires that there are no events E
|
||||
and F with E ->rcu-link F ->rcu-fence E. Or to put it a third way,
|
||||
and F with E ->rcu-link F ->rcu-order E. Or to put it a third way,
|
||||
the axiom requires that there are no cycles consisting of rcu-gp and
|
||||
rcu-rscsi alternating with rcu-link, where the number of rcu-gp links
|
||||
is >= the number of rcu-rscsi links.
|
||||
@ -1750,7 +1769,7 @@ addition to normal RCU. The ideas involved are much the same as
|
||||
above, with new relations srcu-gp and srcu-rscsi added to represent
|
||||
SRCU grace periods and read-side critical sections. There is a
|
||||
restriction on the srcu-gp and srcu-rscsi links that can appear in an
|
||||
rcu-fence sequence (the srcu-rscsi links must be paired with srcu-gp
|
||||
rcu-order sequence (the srcu-rscsi links must be paired with srcu-gp
|
||||
links having the same SRCU domain with proper nesting); the details
|
||||
are relatively unimportant.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user