renegade-project/linux-next
2
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git synced 2024-12-19 02:34:01 +08:00
Code

mmc: block: prevent propagating R1_OUT_OF_RANGE for open-ending mode

Browse Source 
We to some extent should tolerate R1_OUT_OF_RANGE for open-ending
mode as it is expected behaviour and most of the backup partition
tables should be located near some of the last blocks which will
always make open-ending read exceed the capacity of cards.

Fixes: 9820a5b111 ("mmc: core: for data errors, take response of stop cmd into account")
Fixes: a04e6bae9e ("mmc: core: check also R1 response for stop commands")
Signed-off-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Tested-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
Shawn Lin 2017-08-18 09:16:08 +08:00 committed by Ulf Hansson
parent 14ccee78fc
commit d83c2dbaa9
1 changed files with 43 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

49
drivers/mmc/core/block.c
View File

@ -1371,12 +1371,46 @@ static inline void mmc_apply_rel_rw(struct mmc_blk_request *brq,
R1_CC_ERROR | /* Card controller error */ \
R1_ERROR) /* General/unknown error */
static bool mmc_blk_has_cmd_err(struct mmc_command *cmd)
static void mmc_blk_eval_resp_error(struct mmc_blk_request *brq)
{
if (!cmd->error && cmd->resp[0] & CMD_ERRORS)
cmd->error = -EIO;
u32 val;
return cmd->error;
/*
* Per the SD specification(physical layer version 4.10)[1],
* section 4.3.3, it explicitly states that "When the last
* block of user area is read using CMD18, the host should
* ignore OUT_OF_RANGE error that may occur even the sequence
* is correct". And JESD84-B51 for eMMC also has a similar
* statement on section 6.8.3.
*
* Multiple block read/write could be done by either predefined
* method, namely CMD23, or open-ending mode. For open-ending mode,
* we should ignore the OUT_OF_RANGE error as it's normal behaviour.
*
* However the spec[1] doesn't tell us whether we should also
* ignore that for predefined method. But per the spec[1], section
* 4.15 Set Block Count Command, it says"If illegal block count
* is set, out of range error will be indicated during read/write
* operation (For example, data transfer is stopped at user area
* boundary)." In another word, we could expect a out of range error
* in the response for the following CMD18/25. And if argument of
* CMD23 + the argument of CMD18/25 exceed the max number of blocks,
* we could also expect to get a -ETIMEDOUT or any error number from
* the host drivers due to missing data response(for write)/data(for
* read), as the cards will stop the data transfer by itself per the
* spec. So we only need to check R1_OUT_OF_RANGE for open-ending mode.
*/
if (!brq->stop.error) {
bool oor_with_open_end;
/* If there is no error yet, check R1 response */
val = brq->stop.resp[0] & CMD_ERRORS;
oor_with_open_end = val & R1_OUT_OF_RANGE && !brq->mrq.sbc;
if (val && !oor_with_open_end)
brq->stop.error = -EIO;
}
}
static enum mmc_blk_status mmc_blk_err_check(struct mmc_card *card,
@ -1400,8 +1434,11 @@ static enum mmc_blk_status mmc_blk_err_check(struct mmc_card *card,
* stop.error indicates a problem with the stop command. Data
* may have been transferred, or may still be transferring.
*/
if (brq->sbc.error || brq->cmd.error || mmc_blk_has_cmd_err(&brq->stop) ||
brq->data.error) {
mmc_blk_eval_resp_error(brq);
if (brq->sbc.error || brq->cmd.error ||
brq->stop.error || brq->data.error) {
switch (mmc_blk_cmd_recovery(card, req, brq, &ecc_err, &gen_err)) {
case ERR_RETRY:
return MMC_BLK_RETRY;