mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-17 09:43:59 +08:00
lookup_one_len_unlocked(): use lookup_dcache()
No need to lock parent just because of ->d_revalidate() on child; contrary to the stale comment, lookup_dcache() *can* be used without locking the parent. Result can be moved as soon as we return, of course, but the same is true for lookup_one_len_unlocked() itself. Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
74ff0ffc7f
commit
d6d95ded91
12
fs/namei.c
12
fs/namei.c
@ -1444,8 +1444,6 @@ static int follow_dotdot(struct nameidata *nd)
|
||||
* This looks up the name in dcache, possibly revalidates the old dentry and
|
||||
* allocates a new one if not found or not valid. In the need_lookup argument
|
||||
* returns whether i_op->lookup is necessary.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* dir->d_inode->i_mutex must be held
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct dentry *lookup_dcache(struct qstr *name, struct dentry *dir,
|
||||
unsigned int flags)
|
||||
@ -2351,15 +2349,7 @@ struct dentry *lookup_one_len_unlocked(const char *name,
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(err);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* __d_lookup() is used to try to get a quick answer and avoid the
|
||||
* mutex. A false-negative does no harm.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = __d_lookup(base, &this);
|
||||
if (ret && unlikely(ret->d_flags & DCACHE_OP_REVALIDATE)) {
|
||||
dput(ret);
|
||||
ret = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
ret = lookup_dcache(&this, base, 0);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user