mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-23 12:43:55 +08:00
sched: Fix race against ptrace_freeze_trace()
There is apparently one site that violates the rule that only current and ttwu() will modify task->state, namely ptrace_{,un}freeze_traced() will change task->state for a remote task. Oleg explains: "TASK_TRACED/TASK_STOPPED was always protected by siglock. In particular, ttwu(__TASK_TRACED) must be always called with siglock held. That is why ptrace_freeze_traced() assumes it can safely do s/TASK_TRACED/__TASK_TRACED/ under spin_lock(siglock)." This breaks the ordering scheme introduced by commit:dbfb089d36
("sched: Fix loadavg accounting race") Specifically, the reload not matching no longer implies we don't have to block. Simply things by noting that what we need is a LOAD->STORE ordering and this can be provided by a control dependency. So replace: prev_state = prev->state; raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock); smp_mb__after_spinlock(); /* SMP-MB */ if (... && prev_state && prev_state == prev->state) deactivate_task(); with: prev_state = prev->state; if (... && prev_state) /* CTRL-DEP */ deactivate_task(); Since that already implies the 'prev->state' load must be complete before allowing the 'prev->on_rq = 0' store to become visible. Fixes:dbfb089d36
("sched: Fix loadavg accounting race") Reported-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Tested-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Tested-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ba47d845d7
commit
d136122f58
@ -4119,9 +4119,6 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
|
||||
local_irq_disable();
|
||||
rcu_note_context_switch(preempt);
|
||||
|
||||
/* See deactivate_task() below. */
|
||||
prev_state = prev->state;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make sure that signal_pending_state()->signal_pending() below
|
||||
* can't be reordered with __set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE)
|
||||
@ -4145,11 +4142,16 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
|
||||
update_rq_clock(rq);
|
||||
|
||||
switch_count = &prev->nivcsw;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must re-load prev->state in case ttwu_remote() changed it
|
||||
* before we acquired rq->lock.
|
||||
* We must load prev->state once (task_struct::state is volatile), such
|
||||
* that:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - we form a control dependency vs deactivate_task() below.
|
||||
* - ptrace_{,un}freeze_traced() can change ->state underneath us.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!preempt && prev_state && prev_state == prev->state) {
|
||||
prev_state = prev->state;
|
||||
if (!preempt && prev_state) {
|
||||
if (signal_pending_state(prev_state, prev)) {
|
||||
prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
@ -4163,10 +4165,12 @@ static void __sched notrace __schedule(bool preempt)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* __schedule() ttwu()
|
||||
* prev_state = prev->state; if (READ_ONCE(p->on_rq) && ...)
|
||||
* LOCK rq->lock goto out;
|
||||
* smp_mb__after_spinlock(); smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
|
||||
* p->on_rq = 0; p->state = TASK_WAKING;
|
||||
* prev_state = prev->state; if (p->on_rq && ...)
|
||||
* if (prev_state) goto out;
|
||||
* p->on_rq = 0; smp_acquire__after_ctrl_dep();
|
||||
* p->state = TASK_WAKING
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Where __schedule() and ttwu() have matching control dependencies.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* After this, schedule() must not care about p->state any more.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user