mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-22 12:14:01 +08:00
NFS: only invalidate dentrys that are clearly invalid.
Since commitbafc9b754f
("vfs: More precise tests in d_invalidate") in v3.18, a return of '0' from ->d_revalidate() will cause the dentry to be invalidated even if it has filesystems mounted on or it or on a descendant. The mounted filesystem is unmounted. This means we need to be careful not to return 0 unless the directory referred to truly is invalid. So -ESTALE or -ENOENT should invalidate the directory. Other errors such a -EPERM or -ERESTARTSYS should be returned from ->d_revalidate() so they are propagated to the caller. A particular problem can be demonstrated by: 1/ mount an NFS filesystem using NFSv3 on /mnt 2/ mount any other filesystem on /mnt/foo 3/ ls /mnt/foo 4/ turn off network, or otherwise make the server unable to respond 5/ ls /mnt/foo & 6/ cat /proc/$!/stack # note that nfs_lookup_revalidate is in the call stack 7/ kill -9 $! # this results in -ERESTARTSYS being returned 8/ observe that /mnt/foo has been unmounted. This patch changes nfs_lookup_revalidate() to only treat -ESTALE from nfs_lookup_verify_inode() and -ESTALE or -ENOENT from ->lookup() as indicating an invalid inode. Other errors are returned. Also nfs_check_inode_attributes() is changed to return -ESTALE rather than -EIO. This is consistent with the error returned in similar circumstances from nfs_update_inode(). As this bug allows any user to unmount a filesystem mounted on an NFS filesystem, this fix is suitable for stable kernels. Fixes:bafc9b754f
("vfs: More precise tests in d_invalidate") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (v3.18+) Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
22368ff11d
commit
cc89684c9a
10
fs/nfs/dir.c
10
fs/nfs/dir.c
@ -1115,11 +1115,13 @@ static int nfs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
|
||||
/* Force a full look up iff the parent directory has changed */
|
||||
if (!nfs_is_exclusive_create(dir, flags) &&
|
||||
nfs_check_verifier(dir, dentry, flags & LOOKUP_RCU)) {
|
||||
|
||||
if (nfs_lookup_verify_inode(inode, flags)) {
|
||||
error = nfs_lookup_verify_inode(inode, flags);
|
||||
if (error) {
|
||||
if (flags & LOOKUP_RCU)
|
||||
return -ECHILD;
|
||||
if (error == -ESTALE)
|
||||
goto out_zap_parent;
|
||||
goto out_error;
|
||||
}
|
||||
nfs_advise_use_readdirplus(dir);
|
||||
goto out_valid;
|
||||
@ -1144,8 +1146,10 @@ static int nfs_lookup_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
|
||||
trace_nfs_lookup_revalidate_enter(dir, dentry, flags);
|
||||
error = NFS_PROTO(dir)->lookup(dir, &dentry->d_name, fhandle, fattr, label);
|
||||
trace_nfs_lookup_revalidate_exit(dir, dentry, flags, error);
|
||||
if (error)
|
||||
if (error == -ESTALE || error == -ENOENT)
|
||||
goto out_bad;
|
||||
if (error)
|
||||
goto out_error;
|
||||
if (nfs_compare_fh(NFS_FH(inode), fhandle))
|
||||
goto out_bad;
|
||||
if ((error = nfs_refresh_inode(inode, fattr)) != 0)
|
||||
|
@ -1315,9 +1315,9 @@ static int nfs_check_inode_attributes(struct inode *inode, struct nfs_fattr *fat
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
/* Has the inode gone and changed behind our back? */
|
||||
if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_FILEID) && nfsi->fileid != fattr->fileid)
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -ESTALE;
|
||||
if ((fattr->valid & NFS_ATTR_FATTR_TYPE) && (inode->i_mode & S_IFMT) != (fattr->mode & S_IFMT))
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -ESTALE;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!nfs_file_has_buffered_writers(nfsi)) {
|
||||
/* Verify a few of the more important attributes */
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user