mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-24 21:24:00 +08:00
x86/apic: Move TSC deadline timer debug printk
Leon reported that the printk_once() in __setup_APIC_LVTT() triggers a lockdep splat due to a lock order violation between hrtimer_base::lock and console_sem, when the 'once' condition is reset via /sys/kernel/debug/clear_warn_once after boot. The initial printk cannot trigger this because that happens during boot when the local APIC timer is set up on the boot CPU. Prevent it by moving the printk to a place which is guaranteed to be only called once during boot. Mark the deadline timer check related functions and data __init while at it. Reported-by: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y2qhoshi.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
fdc63ff0e4
commit
c84cb3735f
@ -352,8 +352,6 @@ static void __setup_APIC_LVTT(unsigned int clocks, int oneshot, int irqen)
|
||||
* According to Intel, MFENCE can do the serialization here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
asm volatile("mfence" : : : "memory");
|
||||
|
||||
printk_once(KERN_DEBUG "TSC deadline timer enabled\n");
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -546,7 +544,7 @@ static struct clock_event_device lapic_clockevent = {
|
||||
};
|
||||
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct clock_event_device, lapic_events);
|
||||
|
||||
static u32 hsx_deadline_rev(void)
|
||||
static __init u32 hsx_deadline_rev(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_stepping) {
|
||||
case 0x02: return 0x3a; /* EP */
|
||||
@ -556,7 +554,7 @@ static u32 hsx_deadline_rev(void)
|
||||
return ~0U;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u32 bdx_deadline_rev(void)
|
||||
static __init u32 bdx_deadline_rev(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_stepping) {
|
||||
case 0x02: return 0x00000011;
|
||||
@ -568,7 +566,7 @@ static u32 bdx_deadline_rev(void)
|
||||
return ~0U;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static u32 skx_deadline_rev(void)
|
||||
static __init u32 skx_deadline_rev(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
switch (boot_cpu_data.x86_stepping) {
|
||||
case 0x03: return 0x01000136;
|
||||
@ -581,7 +579,7 @@ static u32 skx_deadline_rev(void)
|
||||
return ~0U;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static const struct x86_cpu_id deadline_match[] = {
|
||||
static const struct x86_cpu_id deadline_match[] __initconst = {
|
||||
X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL( HASWELL_X, &hsx_deadline_rev),
|
||||
X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL( BROADWELL_X, 0x0b000020),
|
||||
X86_MATCH_INTEL_FAM6_MODEL( BROADWELL_D, &bdx_deadline_rev),
|
||||
@ -603,18 +601,19 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id deadline_match[] = {
|
||||
{},
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
static void apic_check_deadline_errata(void)
|
||||
static __init bool apic_validate_deadline_timer(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const struct x86_cpu_id *m;
|
||||
u32 rev;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER) ||
|
||||
boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
m = x86_match_cpu(deadline_match);
|
||||
if (!m)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Function pointers will have the MSB set due to address layout,
|
||||
@ -626,11 +625,12 @@ static void apic_check_deadline_errata(void)
|
||||
rev = (u32)m->driver_data;
|
||||
|
||||
if (boot_cpu_data.microcode >= rev)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
||||
setup_clear_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_TSC_DEADLINE_TIMER);
|
||||
pr_err(FW_BUG "TSC_DEADLINE disabled due to Errata; "
|
||||
"please update microcode to version: 0x%x (or later)\n", rev);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -2092,7 +2092,8 @@ void __init init_apic_mappings(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned int new_apicid;
|
||||
|
||||
apic_check_deadline_errata();
|
||||
if (apic_validate_deadline_timer())
|
||||
pr_debug("TSC deadline timer available\n");
|
||||
|
||||
if (x2apic_mode) {
|
||||
boot_cpu_physical_apicid = read_apic_id();
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user