mirror of
https://github.com/edk2-porting/linux-next.git
synced 2024-12-20 03:04:01 +08:00
block: don't hold q->sysfs_lock in elevator_init_mq
The original comment says: q->sysfs_lock must be held to provide mutual exclusion between elevator_switch() and here. Which is simply wrong. elevator_init_mq() is only called from blk_mq_init_allocated_queue, which is always called before the request queue is registered via blk_register_queue(), for dm-rq or normal rq based driver. However, queue's kobject is only exposed and added to sysfs in blk_register_queue(). So there isn't such race between elevator_switch() and elevator_init_mq(). So avoid to hold q->sysfs_lock in elevator_init_mq(). Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com> Cc: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9685b22702
commit
c48dac137a
@ -607,23 +607,19 @@ int elevator_init_mq(struct request_queue *q)
|
||||
if (q->nr_hw_queues != 1)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* q->sysfs_lock must be held to provide mutual exclusion between
|
||||
* elevator_switch() and here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
mutex_lock(&q->sysfs_lock);
|
||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_REGISTERED, &q->queue_flags));
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(q->elevator))
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
e = elevator_get(q, "mq-deadline", false);
|
||||
if (!e)
|
||||
goto out_unlock;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
err = blk_mq_init_sched(q, e);
|
||||
if (err)
|
||||
elevator_put(e);
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&q->sysfs_lock);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user